Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Rundeck

203
336
+ 1
7
Tower

208
359
+ 1
80
Add tool

Rundeck vs Tower: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. Cost: One key difference between Rundeck and Tower is the cost. Rundeck is an open-source automation tool that is free to use, while Tower, developed by Red Hat, is a commercial product and requires a subscription to access all its features.

  2. Community Support: Rundeck has a strong community support system where users can find help, documentation, and plugins developed by the community. On the other hand, Tower provides official support from Red Hat, ensuring timely assistance and updates for users.

  3. Scalability: Tower offers more scalability options compared to Rundeck. It can handle larger environments with more nodes and has features specifically designed for enterprise-level automation tasks.

  4. Integration: When it comes to integration capabilities, Tower has deeper integrations with various tools and technologies commonly used in IT operations. Rundeck also supports integrations but may require more effort and customization compared to Tower.

  5. User Interface: Tower provides a sleek and user-friendly interface that simplifies the automation process for users. Rundeck, while functional, may not offer the same level of intuitiveness in its interface design.

  6. Enterprise Features: Tower comes with additional enterprise features such as role-based access control, auditing, and reporting capabilities that cater to the security and compliance needs of large organizations. Rundeck may lack some of these advanced features in its open-source version.

In Summary, Rundeck and Tower differ in cost, community support, scalability, integration capabilities, user interface design, and availability of enterprise features.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Rundeck
Pros of Tower
  • 3
    Role based access control
  • 3
    Easy to understand
  • 1
    Doesn't need containers
  • 19
    Git
  • 16
    Just works
  • 10
    Version control
  • 6
    Awesome
  • 6
    Simple layout
  • 4
    Multiple windows
  • 3
    Automatic repo discovery
  • 3
    Multiple tabs
  • 2
    Submodule support
  • 2
    Github integration
  • 2
    Full featured client
  • 2
    Uses standard git terminology and methods
  • 2
    Gitflow support
  • 2
    Interactive stage or discard by hunks or lines
  • 1
    SAS

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Rundeck
Cons of Tower
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 5
      Expensive
    • 4
      Subscription based
    • 1
      No side by side diff
    • 0
      Merge conflict resolution impossible/unclear

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Rundeck?

    A self-service operations platform used for support tasks, enterprise job scheduling, deployment, and more.

    What is Tower?

    Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Rundeck?
    What companies use Tower?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Rundeck or Tower.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Rundeck?
    What tools integrate with Tower?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Rundeck and Tower?
    Airplane
    It is a developer-centric approach to building internal UIs and workflows. Turn APIs, SQL queries, and scripts into apps for the entire team.
    Jenkins
    In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
    Ansible
    Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.
    Airflow
    Use Airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The Airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command lines utilities makes performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress and troubleshoot issues when needed.
    StackStorm
    StackStorm is a platform for integration and automation across services and tools. It ties together your existing infrastructure and application environment so you can more easily automate that environment -- with a particular focus on taking actions in response to events.
    See all alternatives