Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Campaign Monitor vs SendGrid: What are the differences?
Developers describe Campaign Monitor as "Send beautiful email newsletters". Campaign Monitor makes it easy to attract new subscribers, send them beautiful email newsletters and see stunning reports on the results. On the other hand, SendGrid is detailed as "Email Delivery. Simplified". SendGrid's cloud-based email infrastructure relieves businesses of the cost and complexity of maintaining custom email systems. SendGrid provides reliable delivery, scalability and real-time analytics along with flexible API's that make custom integration a breeze.
Campaign Monitor and SendGrid are primarily classified as "Email Marketing" and "Transactional Email" tools respectively.
Some of the features offered by Campaign Monitor are:
- Inline CSS
- No Ugly Badges
- Free Hosting for images
On the other hand, SendGrid provides the following key features:
- Open Tracking
- Click Tracking
- Unsubscribe Tracking
"Beautiful product" is the primary reason why developers consider Campaign Monitor over the competitors, whereas "Easy setup" was stated as the key factor in picking SendGrid.
According to the StackShare community, SendGrid has a broader approval, being mentioned in 2706 company stacks & 431 developers stacks; compared to Campaign Monitor, which is listed in 50 company stacks and 9 developer stacks.
For transactional emails, notifications, reminders, etc, I want to make it so writers/designers can set up the emails and maintain them, and then dynamically insert fields, that I then replace when actually sending the mail from code.
I think the ability to use a basic layout template across individual email templates would make things a lot easier (think header, footer, standard typography, etc).
What is best for this? Why would you prefer Mailgun, SendGrid, Mandrill or something else?
If you need your emails to be sent in a time-sensitive manner, I'd recommend SendGrid. We were using Mailgun and the lag because they aren't "transactional" in nature caused issues for us. SendGrid also has the ability to do dynamic templates and bulk send from their API. I don't know that they have the shared layout ability you mentioned, though.
The only transactional email service that I've been able to stomach is Postmark! It is by far the easiest (and quickest to get feedback from) service that I have come across. While drowning in attempts to debug Mandril, Mailgun and others I get quick feedback from Postmark in what I need to do.
Postmark for the win!
We are using more extensively Mandrill.
It is a ok tool, which gives you the power for emailing with nice set of features.
The templates editing and management is a bit tricky, but this is mostly related to email templates in general, which are hard to create and maintain.
I do not think you can share the parts of the templates. You can have your predefined templates with possibility to insert dynamic content.
They provide a limited possibility to preview and test your templates.
The template editor is text only. For the better editors checkout http://topol.io or https://mosaico.io
Unfortunately, I do not have experience with the other tools and possibilities to manage templates.
At this stage, all of the tools you mentioned do email delivery pretty well. They all support email templates as well. Here are some considerations:
- Twilio owns SendGrid. If you're an existing Twilio customer, in my opinion that's a good reason to use SendGrid over the other solutions. The APIs are solid, and Twilio has excellent developer tools that allow you to create interesting automations (which is important for scaling).
- Mandrill was created by MailChimp, who have massive experience with email delivery and specifically with emailing beautiful email templates.
- Mailgun is a tool on its own. Like the other two, it supports mail templates and is built to be controlled almost exclusively via APIs.
SendGrid and Mandrill have pretty nice WYSIWIG template editors as part of their platform. Not so sure about Mailgun.
So for me the considerations would be: 1. How easy is it for you to integrate with their API? How complete is their API in terms of your own specific needs? 2. Prices: Which one works best for my budget? 3. Am I OK with editing the templates elsewhere (or even by hand), and then pasting the code into Mailgun? Or do I want the comfort of Mandrill or Sendgrid with their WYSIWYG editors?
Personally I'd go with Twilio, simply because it's such a massive ecosystem they are less likely to go bankrupt, and their APIs are rock solid.
Pros of Campaign Monitor
- Beautiful product12
- Good support4
- White labelled4
- Great team3
- Great analytics3
- HTML email client testing2
Pros of Twilio SendGrid
- Easy setup190
- Cheap and simple137
- Easy email integration!107
- Reliable86
- Well-documented58
- Generous free allowance to get you started28
- Trackable25
- Heroku add-on21
- Azure add-on15
- Better support for third party integrations13
- Simple installation6
- Free plan6
- Helpful evangelist staff4
- Great client libraries4
- Great support3
- Better customer support than the competition3
- Great add-ons3
- Nice dashboard2
- Scalable2
- Web editor for templates1
- Cool setup1
- Within integration1
- Easy set up1
- Free1
- Great customer support1
- Google cloud messaging1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Campaign Monitor
Cons of Twilio SendGrid
- Google analytics integration is not campaign-specific3
- Shared IP blacklist removal takes months1
- Shares IP blacklist removal0
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Campaign Monitor?
What is Twilio SendGrid?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Twilio SendGrid?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Campaign Monitor?
What tools integrate with Twilio SendGrid?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+31
+37
+39
+20