1. Integration with other tools: One key difference between Typeform and Wufoo is their integration capabilities. Typeform offers integrations with a wide range of tools like Salesforce, Google Sheets, and Mailchimp. On the other hand, Wufoo provides integrations with fewer third-party tools, limiting its compatibility with external platforms.

2. Design Customization: When it comes to design customization, Typeform offers a more visually appealing and modern interface with various customization options. Wufoo, on the other hand, provides a more basic design interface and limited customization features compared to Typeform.

3. Question types and features: Typeform offers a more extensive range of question types and interactive features such as dynamic content, custom thank you screens, and Logic Jumps. In contrast, Wufoo provides a more traditional set of question types and lacks some of the advanced features offered by Typeform.

4. Pricing model: Typeform and Wufoo differ in their pricing models. Typeform offers a subscription-based pricing model with different tiers based on the user's needs, while Wufoo follows a more traditional pay-per-form submission pricing structure, which can become expensive for users with high form submission rates.

5. Mobile optimization: Typeform is known for its mobile-optimized forms that provide a seamless user experience on both desktop and mobile devices. Wufoo, although having mobile-responsive forms, may not offer the same level of optimization and user experience as Typeform on mobile devices.

6. Analytics and reporting: Typeform provides more robust analytics and reporting features, allowing users to track form submissions, view completion rates, and analyze responses in a more detailed manner. Wufoo, while offering basic analytics capabilities, may not provide the same level of in-depth insights and reporting tools as Typeform.

In Summary, Typeform stands out for its integration capabilities, design customization, advanced features, and analytics tools compared to Wufoo, which offers a more basic design interface, limited integrations, and traditional pricing model.