Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Docker vs Vagrant: What are the differences?
Docker is a containerization platform that enables you to package and run applications in isolated environments called containers. Vagrant is a tool for creating and managing virtual development environments, providing a consistent and reproducible setup for developers working on different machines. Here are some key differences between Docker and Vagrant:
Virtualization vs Containerization: Vagrant is primarily a virtualization tool to create and manage lightweight, isolated virtual machines (VMs) for development and testing purposes. It uses providers like VirtualBox, VMware, or Hyper-V to create VMs and provisions them with the necessary software and configurations. Docker, on the other hand, is a containerization platform that allows for lightweight, isolated application packaging using containers. It provides a consistent runtime environment that encapsulates an application and its dependencies, making it portable and easily deployable.
Development vs Production Focus: Vagrant is mainly designed for local development environments. It provides reproducible development environments that closely resemble production setups. Developers can define the desired state of a VM through a configuration file, and Vagrant automatically creates and provisions the VM accordingly. Docker, on the other hand, is designed for both development and production environments. It emphasizes creating containerized applications that can run consistently across different environments, from local development to production deployment.
Complexity vs Simplicity: Vagrant offers more flexibility and control over VM configurations. This flexibility comes with a certain level of complexity, as managing VMs requires understanding the underlying virtualization technology and configuring the VM settings. Docker, in contrast, provides a simpler and more lightweight approach to application deployment using containers. It abstracts away much of the infrastructure complexity and offers standardized tools and workflows for building, distributing, and running containerized applications.
Resource Utilization: Vagrant creates full-fledged VMs, which require more resources in terms of disk space and memory compared to Docker containers. VMs have their own operating system, kernel, and hardware virtualization overhead, which can make them heavier in terms of resource utilization. Docker containers, on the other hand, share the host operating system and kernel, resulting in lower resource overhead and faster startup times. This makes Docker more suitable for lightweight and scalable deployments, especially in cloud-native and microservices architectures.
In summary, Vagrant focuses on creating and managing virtual machines for development environments, providing flexibility and reproducibility. Docker, on the other hand, specializes in lightweight application containerization, making it easier to package, distribute, and deploy applications consistently across different environments, from development to production.
lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.
Pros of Docker
- Rapid integration and build up823
- Isolation692
- Open source521
- Testability and reproducibility505
- Lightweight460
- Standardization218
- Scalable185
- Upgrading / downgrading / application versions106
- Security88
- Private paas environments85
- Portability34
- Limit resource usage26
- Game changer17
- I love the way docker has changed virtualization16
- Fast14
- Concurrency12
- Docker's Compose tools8
- Easy setup6
- Fast and Portable6
- Because its fun5
- Makes shipping to production very simple4
- Highly useful3
- It's dope3
- Package the environment with the application2
- Super2
- Open source and highly configurable2
- Simplicity, isolation, resource effective2
- MacOS support FAKE2
- Its cool2
- Does a nice job hogging memory2
- Docker hub for the FTW2
- HIgh Throughput2
- Very easy to setup integrate and build2
- Asdfd0
Pros of Vagrant
- Development environments352
- Simple bootstraping290
- Free237
- Boxes139
- Provisioning130
- Portable84
- Synced folders81
- Reproducible69
- Ssh51
- Very flexible44
- Works well, can be replicated easily with other devs5
- Easy-to-share, easy-to-version dev configuration5
- Great3
- Just works3
- Quick way to get running2
- DRY - "Do Not Repeat Yourself"1
- Container Friendly1
- What is vagrant?1
- Good documentation1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Docker
- New versions == broken features8
- Unreliable networking6
- Documentation not always in sync6
- Moves quickly4
- Not Secure3
Cons of Vagrant
- Can become v complex w prod. provisioner (Salt, etc.)2
- Multiple VMs quickly eat up disk space2
- Development environment that kills your battery1