Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Veracode vs WhiteSource: What are the differences?
Introduction: Below are the key differences between Veracode and WhiteSource.
Deployment Model: Veracode offers a cloud-based deployment model, allowing users to access their services and solutions over the internet without the need for any on-premises hardware or software. On the other hand, WhiteSource provides both cloud-based and on-premises deployment options, giving users the flexibility to choose the deployment model that suits their requirements and preferences.
Application Security Testing: Veracode specializes in static and dynamic application security testing (SAST and DAST). It performs comprehensive assessments of an application's code from a security standpoint. On the contrary, while WhiteSource also offers some application security testing capabilities, its main focus is on software composition analysis (SCA). This means WhiteSource provides in-depth analysis of open source components within an application, identifying vulnerabilities, and applying remediation strategies.
Reporting and Compliance: Veracode provides robust reporting and compliance features, allowing users to generate detailed reports on security flaws detected during testing and track the progress of remediation efforts. It also helps organizations comply with industry standards and regulations such as PCI DSS and HIPAA. WhiteSource, while providing some reporting capabilities, mainly focuses on license compliance and vulnerability management of open source components.
Integration Capabilities: Both Veracode and WhiteSource offer integration capabilities with various development tools and platforms. However, Veracode has a wider range of integrations available, including popular IDEs, bug tracking systems, and CI/CD pipelines. This seamless integration with existing development environments enables easier adoption and streamlines the security testing and remediation processes.
Scalability: Veracode is known for its scalability, supporting the security testing needs of large enterprises and complex applications. It offers a highly scalable platform that can handle a high volume of applications and concurrent tests, making it suitable for organizations with extensive software development processes. WhiteSource, while also scalable, is more commonly used by smaller organizations or those primarily focused on managing open source components.
User Interface and User Experience: Veracode provides a user-friendly and intuitive interface, making it easier for users to navigate through the platform and access the relevant features and functionalities. It offers a visually appealing and organized environment for managing application security. While WhiteSource also offers a user-friendly interface, some users may find Veracode's interface more polished and pleasant to work with.
In Summary, Veracode and WhiteSource differ in their deployment models, application security testing focus, reporting and compliance features, integration capabilities, scalability, and user interface. These distinctions allow organizations to choose the solution that best fits their specific needs and objectives.
I'm beginning to research the right way to better integrate how we achieve SCA / shift-left / SecureDevOps / secure software supply chain. If you use or have evaluated WhiteSource, Snyk, Sonatype Nexus, SonarQube or similar, I would very much appreciate your perspective on strengths and weaknesses and how you selected your ultimate solution. I want to integrate with GitLab CI.
I'd recommend Snyk since it provides an IDE extension for Developers, SAST, auto PR security fixes, container, IaC and includes open source scanning as well. I like their scoring method as well for better prioritization. I was able to remove most of the containers and cli tools I had in my pipelines since Snyk covers secrets, vulns, security and some code cleaning. SAST has false positives but the scoring helps. Also had to spend time putting some training docs but their engineers helped out with content.