Veracode vs WhiteSource

Overview

WhiteSource

Stacks25

Followers67

Votes0

Veracode

Stacks66

Followers129

Votes0

Veracode vs WhiteSource: What are the differences?

Introduction: Below are the key differences between Veracode and WhiteSource.

Deployment Model: Veracode offers a cloud-based deployment model, allowing users to access their services and solutions over the internet without the need for any on-premises hardware or software. On the other hand, WhiteSource provides both cloud-based and on-premises deployment options, giving users the flexibility to choose the deployment model that suits their requirements and preferences.
Application Security Testing: Veracode specializes in static and dynamic application security testing (SAST and DAST). It performs comprehensive assessments of an application's code from a security standpoint. On the contrary, while WhiteSource also offers some application security testing capabilities, its main focus is on software composition analysis (SCA). This means WhiteSource provides in-depth analysis of open source components within an application, identifying vulnerabilities, and applying remediation strategies.
Reporting and Compliance: Veracode provides robust reporting and compliance features, allowing users to generate detailed reports on security flaws detected during testing and track the progress of remediation efforts. It also helps organizations comply with industry standards and regulations such as PCI DSS and HIPAA. WhiteSource, while providing some reporting capabilities, mainly focuses on license compliance and vulnerability management of open source components.
Integration Capabilities: Both Veracode and WhiteSource offer integration capabilities with various development tools and platforms. However, Veracode has a wider range of integrations available, including popular IDEs, bug tracking systems, and CI/CD pipelines. This seamless integration with existing development environments enables easier adoption and streamlines the security testing and remediation processes.
Scalability: Veracode is known for its scalability, supporting the security testing needs of large enterprises and complex applications. It offers a highly scalable platform that can handle a high volume of applications and concurrent tests, making it suitable for organizations with extensive software development processes. WhiteSource, while also scalable, is more commonly used by smaller organizations or those primarily focused on managing open source components.
User Interface and User Experience: Veracode provides a user-friendly and intuitive interface, making it easier for users to navigate through the platform and access the relevant features and functionalities. It offers a visually appealing and organized environment for managing application security. While WhiteSource also offers a user-friendly interface, some users may find Veracode's interface more polished and pleasant to work with.

In Summary, Veracode and WhiteSource differ in their deployment models, application security testing focus, reporting and compliance features, integration capabilities, scalability, and user interface. These distinctions allow organizations to choose the solution that best fits their specific needs and objectives.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on WhiteSource, Veracode

Bryan

SRE Manager at Subsplash

Apr 1, 2020

Needs adviceon

WhiteSource

Snyk

Sonatype Nexus

I'm beginning to research the right way to better integrate how we achieve SCA / shift-left / SecureDevOps / secure software supply chain. If you use or have evaluated WhiteSource, Snyk, Sonatype Nexus, SonarQube or similar, I would very much appreciate your perspective on strengths and weaknesses and how you selected your ultimate solution. I want to integrate with GitLab CI.

461k views461k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

WhiteSource	Veracode
The leading solution for agile open source security and license compliance management, WhiteSource integrates with the DevOps pipeline to detect vulnerable open source libraries in real-time.	It seamlessly integrates application security into the software lifecycle, effectively eliminating vulnerabilities during the lowest-cost point in the development/deployment chain, and blocking threats while in production.
Open source components identification; Open source security management; Open source licensees management Open source policies enforcement; Due diligence report;	Statice Application Security Scanning; Dynamic Application Security Scanning
Statistics
Stacks 25	Stacks 66
Followers 67	Followers 129
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Apache Ant Docker AWS CodeBuild Apache Maven PHP Google Cloud Build .NET Core CocoaPods npm TeamCity	Gradle Apache Maven Jenkins Bitbucket Travis CI Apache Ant Appveyor

What are some alternatives to WhiteSource, Veracode?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

Related Comparisons

Veracode vs WhiteSource: What are the differences?

Introduction: Below are the key differences between Veracode and WhiteSource.

Deployment Model: Veracode offers a cloud-based deployment model, allowing users to access their services and solutions over the internet without the need for any on-premises hardware or software. On the other hand, WhiteSource provides both cloud-based and on-premises deployment options, giving users the flexibility to choose the deployment model that suits their requirements and preferences.
Application Security Testing: Veracode specializes in static and dynamic application security testing (SAST and DAST). It performs comprehensive assessments of an application's code from a security standpoint. On the contrary, while WhiteSource also offers some application security testing capabilities, its main focus is on software composition analysis (SCA). This means WhiteSource provides in-depth analysis of open source components within an application, identifying vulnerabilities, and applying remediation strategies.
Reporting and Compliance: Veracode provides robust reporting and compliance features, allowing users to generate detailed reports on security flaws detected during testing and track the progress of remediation efforts. It also helps organizations comply with industry standards and regulations such as PCI DSS and HIPAA. WhiteSource, while providing some reporting capabilities, mainly focuses on license compliance and vulnerability management of open source components.
Integration Capabilities: Both Veracode and WhiteSource offer integration capabilities with various development tools and platforms. However, Veracode has a wider range of integrations available, including popular IDEs, bug tracking systems, and CI/CD pipelines. This seamless integration with existing development environments enables easier adoption and streamlines the security testing and remediation processes.
Scalability: Veracode is known for its scalability, supporting the security testing needs of large enterprises and complex applications. It offers a highly scalable platform that can handle a high volume of applications and concurrent tests, making it suitable for organizations with extensive software development processes. WhiteSource, while also scalable, is more commonly used by smaller organizations or those primarily focused on managing open source components.
User Interface and User Experience: Veracode provides a user-friendly and intuitive interface, making it easier for users to navigate through the platform and access the relevant features and functionalities. It offers a visually appealing and organized environment for managing application security. While WhiteSource also offers a user-friendly interface, some users may find Veracode's interface more polished and pleasant to work with.

Veracode vs WhiteSource

Overview