Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Light Table vs Visual Studio Code: What are the differences?
Introduction:
Light Table and Visual Studio Code are both popular code editors used by developers. While they share some similarities, there are several key differences between the two. In this markdown, we will explore and highlight the main differences between Light Table and Visual Studio Code.
Installation and Platform Support: Light Table is known for its simplicity and ease of installation. It is available on multiple platforms including Windows, macOS, and Linux. On the other hand, Visual Studio Code provides a wider range of platform support including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it accessible to a larger user base.
Extensions and Customization: Visual Studio Code offers a vast number of extensions and customization options, providing developers with a wide range of tools and features. This allows them to tailor their coding environment to their specific needs and preferences. While Light Table also supports extensions, its library of available extensions is relatively smaller compared to Visual Studio Code.
Language Support and IntelliSense: Visual Studio Code offers robust language support with built-in IntelliSense, which provides intelligent code completion and suggestions, making coding faster and more efficient. It supports a wide range of programming languages out of the box. Light Table also provides language support but its IntelliSense capabilities may not be as advanced as Visual Studio Code.
Debugger Integration: Visual Studio Code excels in its debugger integration capabilities. It provides seamless debugging experience with breakpoints, call stacks, and variable inspection for various programming languages. Light Table also supports debugging but its debugging features may not be as extensive as what Visual Studio Code offers.
Git Integration: Both Light Table and Visual Studio Code offer Git integration, allowing developers to easily manage version control within their code editing environment. However, Visual Studio Code provides more advanced Git integration features such as side-by-side diff views, commit history, and staging changes, making it a preferred choice for developers working on projects with extensive version control needs.
Community and Support: Visual Studio Code has a larger community and support base, which is reflected in its extensive documentation, forums, and online resources. Developers using Visual Studio Code can find plenty of help and support from the community when facing issues or seeking guidance. While Light Table also has a supportive community, it may not have the same level of resources and community engagement as Visual Studio Code.
In Summary, Visual Studio Code offers a wider range of platform support, extensive customization options, advanced Git integration, and a larger community and support base compared to Light Table.
Visual Studio Code became famous over the past 3+ years I believe. The clean UI, easy to use UX and the plethora of integrations made it a very easy decision for us. Our gripe with Sublime was probably only the UX side. VSCode has not failed us till now, and still is able to support our development env without any significant effort.
Goland being paid, as well as built only for Go seemed like a significant limitation to not consider it.
I decided to choose VSCode over Sublime text for my Systems Programming class in C. What I love about VSCode is its awesome ability to add extensions. Intellisense is a beautiful debugger, and Remote SSH allows me to login and make real-time changes in VSCode to files on my university server. This is an awesome alternative to going back and forth on pushing/pulling code and logging into servers in the terminal. Great choice for anyone interested in C programming!
Pros of Light Table
Pros of Visual Studio Code
- Powerful multilanguage IDE339
- Fast308
- Front-end develop out of the box193
- Support TypeScript IntelliSense158
- Very basic but free142
- Git integration126
- Intellisense106
- Faster than Atom78
- Better ui, easy plugins, and nice git integration53
- Great Refactoring Tools45
- Good Plugins44
- Terminal42
- Superb markdown support38
- Open Source36
- Extensions34
- Large & up-to-date extension community26
- Awesome UI26
- Powerful and fast24
- Portable22
- Best editor18
- Best code editor18
- Easy to get started with17
- Lots of extensions15
- Built on Electron15
- Crossplatform15
- Good for begginers15
- Extensions for everything14
- Open, cross-platform, fast, monthly updates14
- All Languages Support14
- Easy to use and learn13
- Extensible12
- "fast, stable & easy to use"12
- Totally customizable11
- Git out of the box11
- Faster edit for slow computer11
- Ui design is great11
- Useful for begginer11
- Great community10
- SSH support10
- Fast Startup10
- It has terminal and there are lots of shortcuts in it9
- Powerful Debugger9
- Great language support9
- Works With Almost EveryThing You Need9
- Python extension is fast8
- Can compile and run .py files8
- Great document formater7
- Features rich7
- He is not Michael6
- Awesome multi cursor support6
- Extension Echosystem6
- She is not Rachel6
- Language server client5
- Easy azure5
- SFTP Workspace5
- VSCode.pro Course makes it easy to learn5
- Very proffesional5
- Supports lots of operating systems4
- Has better support and more extentions for debugging4
- Excellent as git difftool and mergetool4
- Virtualenv integration4
- Has more than enough languages for any developer3
- Better autocompletes than Atom3
- Emmet preinstalled3
- 'batteries included'3
- More tools to integrate with vs3
- VS Code Server: Browser version of VS Code2
- Big extension marketplace2
- Customizable2
- Microsoft2
- Light2
- Fast and ruby is built right in2
- CMake support with autocomplete2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Light Table
Cons of Visual Studio Code
- Slow startup46
- Resource hog at times29
- Poor refactoring20
- Poor UI Designer13
- Weak Ui design tools11
- Poor autocomplete10
- Super Slow8
- Huge cpu usage with few installed extension8
- Microsoft sends telemetry data8
- Poor in PHP7
- It's MicroSoft6
- Poor in Python3
- No Built in Browser Preview3
- No color Intergrator3
- Very basic for java development and buggy at times3
- No built in live Preview3
- Electron3
- Bad Plugin Architecture2
- Powered by Electron2
- Terminal does not identify path vars sometimes1
- Slow C++ Language Server1