Alternatives to Amazon Glacier logo

Alternatives to Amazon Glacier

Google Drive, Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage, CrashPlan, and Dropbox are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Amazon Glacier.
126
10

What is Amazon Glacier and what are its top alternatives?

Amazon Glacier is a cloud storage service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that is designed for data archiving and long-term backup. It offers low-cost storage solutions for data that is accessed infrequently and is stored for long periods of time. Key features of Amazon Glacier include secure and durable storage, data encryption, flexible retrieval options, and integration with other AWS services. However, its limitations include slower retrieval times compared to other storage options, additional costs for data retrieval, and complex pricing structures.

  1. Google Cloud Storage Nearline: Google Cloud Storage Nearline is a low-cost, highly durable storage service for data archiving and backup. Key features include low latency and high availability, powerful data analytics, and seamless integration with other Google Cloud services. Pros include fast data access and customizable storage classes, while cons include potential network egress fees.

  2. Microsoft Azure Archive Storage: Microsoft Azure Archive Storage offers a cost-effective storage solution for rarely accessed data. Key features include data encryption, geo-redundancy, and flexible data retrieval options. Pros include seamless integration with other Azure services and competitive pricing, while cons include potential data retrieval delays.

  3. Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage: Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage provides a reliable and affordable storage solution for data backups and archival. Key features include unlimited data retention, client-side encryption, and simple pricing structure. Pros include customizable storage classes and no additional data retrieval fees, while cons include limited availability zones and potential latency issues.

  4. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage: Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage offers a high-performance, low-cost storage solution for data archiving and backup. Key features include immutable object storage, global data centers, and predictable pricing. Pros include fast data retrieval speeds and no data retrieval fees, while cons include limited integration with other cloud services.

  5. IBM Cloud Object Storage: IBM Cloud Object Storage is a secure and scalable storage solution for data archiving and long-term backup. Key features include data encryption, automatic data replication, and flexible storage classes. Pros include high availability and durable storage, while cons include potentially complex pricing structures.

  6. DigitalOcean Spaces: DigitalOcean Spaces is an object storage service that offers scalable and secure storage for data archival. Key features include automatic daily backups, CDN integration, and affordable pricing. Pros include easy scalability and seamless compatibility with DigitalOcean droplets, while cons include limited storage class options.

  7. MinIO: MinIO is an open-source, high-performance object storage solution that can be deployed on-premises or in the cloud. Key features include S3 compatibility, erasure coding, and data encryption. Pros include unlimited scalability and self-hosting capabilities, while cons include potential complexity in configuration and maintenance.

  8. Tardigrade by Storj: Tardigrade by Storj is a decentralized cloud storage platform that offers secure and private data archival solutions. Key features include client-side encryption, end-to-end data integrity checks, and global data distribution. Pros include high data durability and low costs, while cons include potential latency issues and limited integration with other cloud services.

  9. Oracle Cloud Archive Storage: Oracle Cloud Archive Storage provides a cost-effective and reliable storage solution for data archiving and backup. Key features include data encryption, automatic data replication, and seamless integration with other Oracle Cloud services. Pros include high availability and durable storage, while cons include potentially higher pricing compared to other options.

  10. Scaleway Object Storage: Scaleway Object Storage is a secure and scalable storage solution for data archiving and backups. Key features include automatic data replication, CDN integration, and competitive pricing. Pros include customizable storage classes and high availability, while cons include potential data retrieval costs.

Top Alternatives to Amazon Glacier

  • Google Drive
    Google Drive

    Keep photos, stories, designs, drawings, recordings, videos, and more. Your first 15 GB of storage are free with a Google Account. Your files in Drive can be reached from any smartphone, tablet, or computer. ...

  • Amazon S3
    Amazon S3

    Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web ...

  • Google Cloud Storage
    Google Cloud Storage

    Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure. ...

  • CrashPlan
    CrashPlan

    It runs continually in the background of a device, providing constant backup of new files. Any time a new file is created or an existing file is changed, the product adds the file to a "to do" list. ...

  • Dropbox
    Dropbox

    Harness the power of Dropbox. Connect to an account, upload, download, search, and more. ...

  • Postman
    Postman

    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide. ...

  • Postman
    Postman

    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide. ...

  • Stack Overflow
    Stack Overflow

    Stack Overflow is a question and answer site for professional and enthusiast programmers. It's built and run by you as part of the Stack Exchange network of Q&A sites. With your help, we're working together to build a library of detailed answers to every question about programming. ...

Amazon Glacier alternatives & related posts

Google Drive logo

Google Drive

82K
68.2K
2.1K
A safe place for all your files
82K
68.2K
+ 1
2.1K
PROS OF GOOGLE DRIVE
  • 505
    Easy to use
  • 326
    Gmail integration
  • 312
    Enough free space
  • 268
    Collaboration
  • 249
    Stable service
  • 128
    Desktop and mobile apps
  • 97
    Offline sync
  • 79
    Apps
  • 74
    15 gb storage
  • 50
    Add-ons
  • 9
    Integrates well
  • 6
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Simple back-up tool
  • 2
    Amazing
  • 2
    Beautiful
  • 2
    Fast upload speeds
  • 2
    The more the merrier
  • 2
    So easy
  • 2
    Wonderful
  • 2
    Linux terminal transfer tools
  • 2
    It has grown to a stable in the cloud office
  • 1
    UI
  • 1
    Windows desktop
  • 1
    G Suite integration
CONS OF GOOGLE DRIVE
  • 7
    Organization via web ui sucks
  • 2
    Not a real database

related Google Drive posts

Tom Klein

Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

See more
Shared insights
on
Google DriveGoogle DriveDropboxDropbox

I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?

Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?

See more
Amazon S3 logo

Amazon S3

53.2K
39.8K
2K
Store and retrieve any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web
53.2K
39.8K
+ 1
2K
PROS OF AMAZON S3
  • 590
    Reliable
  • 492
    Scalable
  • 456
    Cheap
  • 329
    Simple & easy
  • 83
    Many sdks
  • 30
    Logical
  • 13
    Easy Setup
  • 11
    REST API
  • 11
    1000+ POPs
  • 6
    Secure
  • 4
    Easy
  • 4
    Plug and play
  • 3
    Web UI for uploading files
  • 2
    Faster on response
  • 2
    Flexible
  • 2
    GDPR ready
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Plug-gable
  • 1
    Easy integration with CloudFront
CONS OF AMAZON S3
  • 7
    Permissions take some time to get right
  • 6
    Requires a credit card
  • 6
    Takes time/work to organize buckets & folders properly
  • 3
    Complex to set up

related Amazon S3 posts

Ashish Singh
Tech Lead, Big Data Platform at Pinterest · | 38 upvotes · 3.3M views

To provide employees with the critical need of interactive querying, we’ve worked with Presto, an open-source distributed SQL query engine, over the years. Operating Presto at Pinterest’s scale has involved resolving quite a few challenges like, supporting deeply nested and huge thrift schemas, slow/ bad worker detection and remediation, auto-scaling cluster, graceful cluster shutdown and impersonation support for ldap authenticator.

Our infrastructure is built on top of Amazon EC2 and we leverage Amazon S3 for storing our data. This separates compute and storage layers, and allows multiple compute clusters to share the S3 data.

We have hundreds of petabytes of data and tens of thousands of Apache Hive tables. Our Presto clusters are comprised of a fleet of 450 r4.8xl EC2 instances. Presto clusters together have over 100 TBs of memory and 14K vcpu cores. Within Pinterest, we have close to more than 1,000 monthly active users (out of total 1,600+ Pinterest employees) using Presto, who run about 400K queries on these clusters per month.

Each query submitted to Presto cluster is logged to a Kafka topic via Singer. Singer is a logging agent built at Pinterest and we talked about it in a previous post. Each query is logged when it is submitted and when it finishes. When a Presto cluster crashes, we will have query submitted events without corresponding query finished events. These events enable us to capture the effect of cluster crashes over time.

Each Presto cluster at Pinterest has workers on a mix of dedicated AWS EC2 instances and Kubernetes pods. Kubernetes platform provides us with the capability to add and remove workers from a Presto cluster very quickly. The best-case latency on bringing up a new worker on Kubernetes is less than a minute. However, when the Kubernetes cluster itself is out of resources and needs to scale up, it can take up to ten minutes. Some other advantages of deploying on Kubernetes platform is that our Presto deployment becomes agnostic of cloud vendor, instance types, OS, etc.

#BigData #AWS #DataScience #DataEngineering

See more
Russel Werner
Lead Engineer at StackShare · | 32 upvotes · 2.8M views

StackShare Feed is built entirely with React, Glamorous, and Apollo. One of our objectives with the public launch of the Feed was to enable a Server-side rendered (SSR) experience for our organic search traffic. When you visit the StackShare Feed, and you aren't logged in, you are delivered the Trending feed experience. We use an in-house Node.js rendering microservice to generate this HTML. This microservice needs to run and serve requests independent of our Rails web app. Up until recently, we had a mono-repo with our Rails and React code living happily together and all served from the same web process. In order to deploy our SSR app into a Heroku environment, we needed to split out our front-end application into a separate repo in GitHub. The driving factor in this decision was mostly due to limitations imposed by Heroku specifically with how processes can't communicate with each other. A new SSR app was created in Heroku and linked directly to the frontend repo so it stays in-sync with changes.

Related to this, we need a way to "deploy" our frontend changes to various server environments without building & releasing the entire Ruby application. We built a hybrid Amazon S3 Amazon CloudFront solution to host our Webpack bundles. A new CircleCI script builds the bundles and uploads them to S3. The final step in our rollout is to update some keys in Redis so our Rails app knows which bundles to serve. The result of these efforts were significant. Our frontend team now moves independently of our backend team, our build & release process takes only a few minutes, we are now using an edge CDN to serve JS assets, and we have pre-rendered React pages!

#StackDecisionsLaunch #SSR #Microservices #FrontEndRepoSplit

See more
Google Cloud Storage logo

Google Cloud Storage

1.7K
1.2K
75
Durable and highly available object storage service
1.7K
1.2K
+ 1
75
PROS OF GOOGLE CLOUD STORAGE
  • 28
    Scalable
  • 19
    Cheap
  • 14
    Reliable
  • 9
    Easy
  • 3
    Chealp
  • 2
    More praticlal and easy
CONS OF GOOGLE CLOUD STORAGE
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Google Cloud Storage posts

    Context: I wanted to create an end to end IoT data pipeline simulation in Google Cloud IoT Core and other GCP services. I never touched Terraform meaningfully until working on this project, and it's one of the best explorations in my development career. The documentation and syntax is incredibly human-readable and friendly. I'm used to building infrastructure through the google apis via Python , but I'm so glad past Sung did not make that decision. I was tempted to use Google Cloud Deployment Manager, but the templates were a bit convoluted by first impression. I'm glad past Sung did not make this decision either.

    Solution: Leveraging Google Cloud Build Google Cloud Run Google Cloud Bigtable Google BigQuery Google Cloud Storage Google Compute Engine along with some other fun tools, I can deploy over 40 GCP resources using Terraform!

    Check Out My Architecture: CLICK ME

    Check out the GitHub repo attached

    See more
    Aliadoc Team

    In #Aliadoc, we're exploring the crowdfunding option to get traction before launch. We are building a SaaS platform for website design customization.

    For the Admin UI and website editor we use React and we're currently transitioning from a Create React App setup to a custom one because our needs have become more specific. We use CloudFlare as much as possible, it's a great service.

    For routing dynamic resources and proxy tasks to feed websites to the editor we leverage CloudFlare Workers for improved responsiveness. We use Firebase for our hosting needs and user authentication while also using several Cloud Functions for Firebase to interact with other services along with Google App Engine and Google Cloud Storage, but also the Real Time Database is on the radar for collaborative website editing.

    We generally hate configuration but honestly because of the stage of our project we lack resources for doing heavy sysops work. So we are basically just relying on Serverless technologies as much as we can to do all server side processing.

    Visual Studio Code definitively makes programming a much easier and enjoyable task, we just love it. We combine it with Bitbucket for our source code control needs.

    See more
    CrashPlan logo

    CrashPlan

    4
    5
    0
    Data protection software for endpoint devices
    4
    5
    + 1
    0
    PROS OF CRASHPLAN
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF CRASHPLAN
        Be the first to leave a con

        related CrashPlan posts

        Dropbox logo

        Dropbox

        23.3K
        18.2K
        1.7K
        Build the power of Dropbox into your apps
        23.3K
        18.2K
        + 1
        1.7K
        PROS OF DROPBOX
        • 434
          Easy to work with
        • 256
          Free
        • 216
          Popular
        • 176
          Shared file hosting
        • 167
          'just works'
        • 100
          No brainer
        • 79
          Integration with external services
        • 76
          Simple
        • 49
          Good api
        • 38
          Least cost (free) for the basic needs case
        • 11
          It just works
        • 8
          Convenient
        • 7
          Accessible from all of my devices
        • 5
          Command Line client
        • 4
          Synchronizing laptop and desktop - work anywhere
        • 4
          Can even be used by your grandma
        • 3
          Reliable
        • 3
          Sync API
        • 3
          Mac app
        • 3
          Cross platform app
        • 2
          Ability to pay monthly without losing your files
        • 2
          Delta synchronization
        • 2
          Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliably
        • 2
          Backups, local and cloud
        • 2
          Extended version history
        • 2
          Beautiful UI
        • 1
          YC Company
        • 1
          What a beautiful app
        • 1
          Easy/no setup
        • 1
          So easy
        • 1
          The more the merrier
        • 1
          Easy to work with
        • 1
          For when client needs file without opening firewall
        • 1
          Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliabl
        • 1
          Easy to use
        • 1
          Official Linux app
        • 0
          The more the merrier
        CONS OF DROPBOX
        • 3
          Personal vs company account is confusing
        • 1
          Replication kills CPU and battery

        related Dropbox posts

        Shared insights
        on
        Google DriveGoogle DriveDropboxDropbox

        I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?

        Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?

        See more
        Shared insights
        on
        BoxBoxDropboxDropboxKloudlessKloudless

        Anyone recommend a good connector like Kloudless for connecting a SaaS app to Dropbox/Box etc? Cheers

        See more
        Postman logo

        Postman

        94.5K
        81K
        1.8K
        Only complete API development environment
        94.5K
        81K
        + 1
        1.8K
        PROS OF POSTMAN
        • 490
          Easy to use
        • 369
          Great tool
        • 276
          Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
        • 156
          Easy setup, looks good
        • 144
          The best api workflow out there
        • 53
          It's the best
        • 53
          History feature
        • 44
          Adds real value to my workflow
        • 43
          Great interface that magically predicts your needs
        • 35
          The best in class app
        • 12
          Can save and share script
        • 10
          Fully featured without looking cluttered
        • 8
          Collections
        • 8
          Option to run scrips
        • 8
          Global/Environment Variables
        • 7
          Shareable Collections
        • 7
          Dead simple and useful. Excellent
        • 7
          Dark theme easy on the eyes
        • 6
          Awesome customer support
        • 6
          Great integration with newman
        • 5
          Documentation
        • 5
          Simple
        • 5
          The test script is useful
        • 4
          Saves responses
        • 4
          This has simplified my testing significantly
        • 4
          Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
        • 4
          Easy as pie
        • 3
          API-network
        • 3
          I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
        • 3
          Mocking API calls with predefined response
        • 2
          Now supports GraphQL
        • 2
          Postman Runner CI Integration
        • 2
          Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
        • 2
          Continuous integration using newman
        • 2
          Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
        • 2
          Runner
        • 2
          Graph
        • 1
          <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
        CONS OF POSTMAN
        • 10
          Stores credentials in HTTP
        • 9
          Bloated features and UI
        • 8
          Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
        • 7
          Poor GraphQL support
        • 5
          Expensive
        • 3
          Not free after 5 users
        • 3
          Can't prompt for per-request variables
        • 1
          Import swagger
        • 1
          Support websocket
        • 1
          Import curl

        related Postman posts

        Noah Zoschke
        Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 3M views

        We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

        Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

        Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

        This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

        Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

        Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

        Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

        See more
        Simon Reymann
        Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5.1M views

        Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

        • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
        • npm as package manager
        • NestJS as Node.js framework
        • TypeScript as programming language
        • ExpressJS as web server
        • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
        • Postman as a tool for API development
        • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
        • JSON Web Token for access token management

        The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

        • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
        • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
        • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
        • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
        See more
        Postman logo

        Postman

        94.5K
        81K
        1.8K
        Only complete API development environment
        94.5K
        81K
        + 1
        1.8K
        PROS OF POSTMAN
        • 490
          Easy to use
        • 369
          Great tool
        • 276
          Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
        • 156
          Easy setup, looks good
        • 144
          The best api workflow out there
        • 53
          It's the best
        • 53
          History feature
        • 44
          Adds real value to my workflow
        • 43
          Great interface that magically predicts your needs
        • 35
          The best in class app
        • 12
          Can save and share script
        • 10
          Fully featured without looking cluttered
        • 8
          Collections
        • 8
          Option to run scrips
        • 8
          Global/Environment Variables
        • 7
          Shareable Collections
        • 7
          Dead simple and useful. Excellent
        • 7
          Dark theme easy on the eyes
        • 6
          Awesome customer support
        • 6
          Great integration with newman
        • 5
          Documentation
        • 5
          Simple
        • 5
          The test script is useful
        • 4
          Saves responses
        • 4
          This has simplified my testing significantly
        • 4
          Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
        • 4
          Easy as pie
        • 3
          API-network
        • 3
          I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
        • 3
          Mocking API calls with predefined response
        • 2
          Now supports GraphQL
        • 2
          Postman Runner CI Integration
        • 2
          Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
        • 2
          Continuous integration using newman
        • 2
          Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
        • 2
          Runner
        • 2
          Graph
        • 1
          <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
        CONS OF POSTMAN
        • 10
          Stores credentials in HTTP
        • 9
          Bloated features and UI
        • 8
          Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
        • 7
          Poor GraphQL support
        • 5
          Expensive
        • 3
          Not free after 5 users
        • 3
          Can't prompt for per-request variables
        • 1
          Import swagger
        • 1
          Support websocket
        • 1
          Import curl

        related Postman posts

        Noah Zoschke
        Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 3M views

        We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

        Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

        Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

        This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

        Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

        Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

        Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

        See more
        Simon Reymann
        Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5.1M views

        Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

        • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
        • npm as package manager
        • NestJS as Node.js framework
        • TypeScript as programming language
        • ExpressJS as web server
        • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
        • Postman as a tool for API development
        • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
        • JSON Web Token for access token management

        The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

        • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
        • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
        • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
        • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
        See more
        Stack Overflow logo

        Stack Overflow

        69K
        61K
        893
        Question and answer site for professional and enthusiast programmers
        69K
        61K
        + 1
        893
        PROS OF STACK OVERFLOW
        • 257
          Scary smart community
        • 206
          Knows all
        • 142
          Voting system
        • 134
          Good questions
        • 83
          Good SEO
        • 22
          Addictive
        • 14
          Tight focus
        • 10
          Share and gain knowledge
        • 7
          Useful
        • 3
          Fast loading
        • 2
          Gamification
        • 1
          Knows everyone
        • 1
          Experts share experience and answer questions
        • 1
          Stack overflow to developers As google to net surfers
        • 1
          Questions answered quickly
        • 1
          No annoying ads
        • 1
          No spam
        • 1
          Fast community response
        • 1
          Good moderators
        • 1
          Quick answers from users
        • 1
          Good answers
        • 1
          User reputation ranking
        • 1
          Efficient answers
        • 1
          Leading developer community
        CONS OF STACK OVERFLOW
        • 3
          Not welcoming to newbies
        • 3
          Unfair downvoting
        • 3
          Unfriendly moderators
        • 3
          No opinion based questions
        • 3
          Mean users
        • 2
          Limited to types of questions it can accept

        related Stack Overflow posts

        Tom Klein

        Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

        See more