Alternatives to Amazon Route 53 logo

Alternatives to Amazon Route 53

GoDaddy, Google Cloud DNS, CloudFlare, Google Domains, and Namecheap are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Amazon Route 53.
11.1K
6.8K
+ 1
678

What is Amazon Route 53 and what are its top alternatives?

Amazon Route 53 is designed to give developers and businesses an extremely reliable and cost effective way to route end users to Internet applications by translating human readable names like www.example.com into the numeric IP addresses like 192.0.2.1 that computers use to connect to each other. Route 53 effectively connects user requests to infrastructure running in Amazon Web Services (AWS) – such as an Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) instance, an Amazon Elastic Load Balancer, or an Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) bucket – and can also be used to route users to infrastructure outside of AWS.
Amazon Route 53 is a tool in the DNS Management category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Amazon Route 53

  • GoDaddy

    GoDaddy

    Go Daddy makes registering Domain Names fast, simple, and affordable. It is a trusted domain registrar that empowers people with creative ideas to succeed online. ...

  • Google Cloud DNS

    Google Cloud DNS

    Use Google's infrastructure for production quality, high volume DNS serving. Your users will have reliable, low-latency access to Google's infrastructure from anywhere in the world using our network of Anycast name servers. ...

  • CloudFlare

    CloudFlare

    Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet. ...

  • Google Domains

    Google Domains

    It is a domain registration service which includes top website builders. The privacy is included at no additional cost. It also includes simple domain management tools. ...

  • Namecheap

    Namecheap

    We provide a set of DNS servers spread across the US and Europe to deliver highly reliable DNS services to everyone. By choosing Namecheap.com as your domain registrar, you are choosing a highly reputable and reliable partner. Namecheap.com is rated 4.6 out of 5 - Based on 1,395 reviews via Google Checkout ...

  • Amazon S3

    Amazon S3

    Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web ...

  • Akamai

    Akamai

    If you've ever shopped online, downloaded music, watched a web video or connected to work remotely, you've probably used Akamai's cloud platform. Akamai helps businesses connect the hyperconnected, empowering them to transform and reinvent their business online. We remove the complexities of technology, so you can focus on driving your business faster forward. ...

  • DNS Made Easy

    DNS Made Easy

    DNS Made Easy is a subsidiary of Tiggee LLC, and is a world leader in providing global IP Anycast enterprise DNS services. DNS Made Easy is currently ranked the fastest provider for 8 consecutive months and the most reliable provider. ...

Amazon Route 53 alternatives & related posts

GoDaddy logo

GoDaddy

498
456
10
Your all in one solution to grow online
498
456
+ 1
10
PROS OF GODADDY
  • 7
    Flexible payment methods for domains
  • 3
    .io support
CONS OF GODADDY
  • 2
    Constantly trying to upsell you
  • 1
    Not a great UI

related GoDaddy posts

Google Cloud DNS logo

Google Cloud DNS

2.3K
544
36
Reliable, resilient, low-latency DNS serving from Google’s worldwide network of Anycast DNS servers
2.3K
544
+ 1
36
PROS OF GOOGLE CLOUD DNS
  • 9
    Backed by Google
  • 6
    High-availability
  • 5
    Reliable
  • 4
    High volume
  • 3
    Inexpensive
  • 3
    High-Performance
  • 3
    Low-latency
  • 3
    Anycast DNS servers
CONS OF GOOGLE CLOUD DNS
  • 2
    Lack of privacy
  • 1
    Backed by Google

related Google Cloud DNS posts

CloudFlare logo

CloudFlare

67.5K
15.3K
1.7K
The Web Performance & Security Company.
67.5K
15.3K
+ 1
1.7K
PROS OF CLOUDFLARE
  • 420
    Easy setup, great cdn
  • 274
    Free ssl
  • 196
    Easy setup
  • 184
    Security
  • 179
    Ssl
  • 94
    Great cdn
  • 76
    Optimizer
  • 69
    Simple
  • 43
    Great UI
  • 28
    Great js cdn
  • 11
    HTTP/2 Support
  • 11
    AutoMinify
  • 11
    Apps
  • 11
    DNS Analytics
  • 8
    Ipv6
  • 8
    Easy
  • 8
    Rocket Loader
  • 7
    IPv6 "One Click"
  • 6
    Free GeoIP
  • 6
    Fantastic CDN service
  • 6
    Nice DNS
  • 6
    SSHFP
  • 6
    Cheapest SSL
  • 6
    Amazing performance
  • 6
    API
  • 5
    Free and reliable, Faster then anyone else
  • 5
    SPDY
  • 5
    DNSSEC
  • 4
    Asynchronous resource loading
  • 4
    Ip
  • 3
    Easy Use
  • 3
    Ubuntu
  • 3
    Global Load Balancing
  • 3
    Performance
  • 1
    CDN
  • 1
    Maker
  • 1
    Support for SSHFP records
  • 1
    Mtn
CONS OF CLOUDFLARE
  • 1
    Expensive when you exceed their fair usage limits
  • 1
    No support for SSHFP records

related CloudFlare posts

Johnny Bell

When I first built my portfolio I used GitHub for the source control and deployed directly to Netlify on a push to master. This was a perfect setup, I didn't need any knowledge about #DevOps or anything, it was all just done for me.

One of the issues I had with Netlify was I wanted to gzip my JavaScript files, I had this setup in my #Webpack file, however Netlify didn't offer an easy way to set this.

Over the weekend I decided I wanted to know more about how #DevOps worked so I decided to switch from Netlify to Amazon S3. Instead of creating any #Git Webhooks I decided to use Buddy for my pipeline and to run commands. Buddy is a fantastic tool, very easy to setup builds, copying the files to my Amazon S3 bucket, then running some #AWS console commands to set the content-encoding of the JavaScript files. - Buddy is also free if you only have a few pipelines, so I didn't need to pay anything 🤙🏻.

When I made these changes I also wanted to monitor my code, and make sure I was keeping up with the best practices so I implemented Code Climate to look over my code and tell me where there code smells, issues, and other issues I've been super happy with it so far, on the free tier so its also free.

I did plan on using Amazon CloudFront for my SSL and cacheing, however it was overly complex to setup and it costs money. So I decided to go with the free tier of CloudFlare and it is amazing, best choice I've made for caching / SSL in a long time.

See more
Johnny Bell

I recently moved my portfolio to Amazon S3 and I needed a new way to cache and SSL my site as Amazon S3 does not come with this right out of the box. I tried Amazon CloudFront as I was already on Amazon S3 I thought this would be super easy and straight forward to setup... It was not, I was unable to get this working even though I followed all the online steps and even reached out for help to Amazon.

I'd used CloudFlare in the past, and thought let me see if I can set up CloudFlare on an Amazon S3 bucket. The setup for this was so basic and easy... I had it setup with caching and SSL within 5 minutes, and it was 100% free.

See more
Google Domains logo

Google Domains

184
186
4
A domain registration service
184
186
+ 1
4
PROS OF GOOGLE DOMAINS
  • 2
    Minimalist Design
  • 1
    Great support
  • 1
    Easy website builder integration
CONS OF GOOGLE DOMAINS
  • 1
    It takes long time for DNS propagation

related Google Domains posts

Namecheap logo

Namecheap

2.6K
569
45
Cheap Domain Names Registration
2.6K
569
+ 1
45
PROS OF NAMECHEAP
  • 20
    Cheap
  • 9
    Free privacy protection
  • 6
    Awesome customer support
  • 5
    Free email forwarding
  • 3
    Free custom DNS
  • 1
    Premium DNS
  • 1
    24/7 Customer Support
CONS OF NAMECHEAP
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Namecheap posts

    Amazon S3 logo

    Amazon S3

    41.8K
    30.1K
    2K
    Store and retrieve any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web
    41.8K
    30.1K
    + 1
    2K
    PROS OF AMAZON S3
    • 591
      Reliable
    • 492
      Scalable
    • 456
      Cheap
    • 328
      Simple & easy
    • 83
      Many sdks
    • 29
      Logical
    • 12
      Easy Setup
    • 11
      1000+ POPs
    • 10
      REST API
    • 5
      Secure
    • 3
      Easy
    • 2
      Web UI for uploading files
    • 2
      Plug and play
    • 1
      GDPR ready
    • 1
      Flexible
    • 1
      Faster on response
    • 1
      Plug-gable
    • 1
      Easy to use
    • 1
      Easy integration with CloudFront
    CONS OF AMAZON S3
    • 7
      Permissions take some time to get right
    • 6
      Takes time/work to organize buckets & folders properly
    • 5
      Requires a credit card
    • 3
      Complex to set up

    related Amazon S3 posts

    Ashish Singh
    Tech Lead, Big Data Platform at Pinterest · | 36 upvotes · 924.6K views

    To provide employees with the critical need of interactive querying, we’ve worked with Presto, an open-source distributed SQL query engine, over the years. Operating Presto at Pinterest’s scale has involved resolving quite a few challenges like, supporting deeply nested and huge thrift schemas, slow/ bad worker detection and remediation, auto-scaling cluster, graceful cluster shutdown and impersonation support for ldap authenticator.

    Our infrastructure is built on top of Amazon EC2 and we leverage Amazon S3 for storing our data. This separates compute and storage layers, and allows multiple compute clusters to share the S3 data.

    We have hundreds of petabytes of data and tens of thousands of Apache Hive tables. Our Presto clusters are comprised of a fleet of 450 r4.8xl EC2 instances. Presto clusters together have over 100 TBs of memory and 14K vcpu cores. Within Pinterest, we have close to more than 1,000 monthly active users (out of total 1,600+ Pinterest employees) using Presto, who run about 400K queries on these clusters per month.

    Each query submitted to Presto cluster is logged to a Kafka topic via Singer. Singer is a logging agent built at Pinterest and we talked about it in a previous post. Each query is logged when it is submitted and when it finishes. When a Presto cluster crashes, we will have query submitted events without corresponding query finished events. These events enable us to capture the effect of cluster crashes over time.

    Each Presto cluster at Pinterest has workers on a mix of dedicated AWS EC2 instances and Kubernetes pods. Kubernetes platform provides us with the capability to add and remove workers from a Presto cluster very quickly. The best-case latency on bringing up a new worker on Kubernetes is less than a minute. However, when the Kubernetes cluster itself is out of resources and needs to scale up, it can take up to ten minutes. Some other advantages of deploying on Kubernetes platform is that our Presto deployment becomes agnostic of cloud vendor, instance types, OS, etc.

    #BigData #AWS #DataScience #DataEngineering

    See more
    Simon Reymann
    Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 28 upvotes · 3.5M views

    Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

    • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
    • Respectively Git as revision control system
    • SourceTree as Git GUI
    • Visual Studio Code as IDE
    • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
    • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
    • SonarQube as quality gate
    • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
    • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
    • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
    • Heroku for deploying in test environments
    • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
    • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
    • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
    • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
    • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

    The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

    • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
    • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
    • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
    • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
    • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
    • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
    See more
    Akamai logo

    Akamai

    1.9K
    386
    0
    The leading platform for cloud, mobile, media and security across any device, anywhere.
    1.9K
    386
    + 1
    0
    PROS OF AKAMAI
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF AKAMAI
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Akamai posts

        DNS Made Easy logo

        DNS Made Easy

        2.6K
        60
        19
        DNS performance, reliability, and security have never been easier.
        2.6K
        60
        + 1
        19
        PROS OF DNS MADE EASY
        • 9
          Speed
        • 5
          Anycast
        • 2
          Mature
        • 2
          Low Cost
        • 1
          Extremely Easy Interface
        CONS OF DNS MADE EASY
          Be the first to leave a con

          related DNS Made Easy posts