Angular Material vs Vuesax

Overview

Angular Material

Stacks624

Followers755

Votes32

GitHub Stars24.9K

Forks6.8K

Vuesax

Stacks26

Followers126

Votes7

Angular Material vs Vuesax: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Angular Material and Vuesax are both popular UI frameworks used for building web applications. Each framework has its unique features and advantages that cater to different developer needs. Below are the key differences between Angular Material and Vuesax.

Language Compatibility: Angular Material is specifically designed for Angular, which means it is tightly integrated with Angular framework. On the other hand, Vuesax is built for Vue.js, providing seamless integration with Vue components and ecosystem, making it a preferred choice for Vue.js developers.
Component Design: Angular Material offers a rich set of pre-built Material Design components that adhere to Material Design guidelines. It provides ready-to-use components like buttons, menus, cards, etc., which can be easily implemented in Angular applications. Vuesax, on the other hand, offers a more customizable approach with its modular design, allowing developers to create unique UI components tailored to their specific project requirements.
Community Support: Angular Material benefits from the strong community support of Angular developers, providing a wealth of resources, tutorials, and plugins to enhance the framework's functionality. Vuesax, while not as widely adopted as Angular Material, has a growing community of Vue.js enthusiasts who contribute to the framework's development and offer assistance to fellow developers.
Customization Options: Angular Material comes with a more opinionated approach, offering a standardized set of design patterns and components based on the Material Design guidelines. While this streamlines the development process, it may limit the flexibility for customization. Vuesax, on the other hand, gives developers more flexibility to customize and style components, making it ideal for projects with unique design requirements.
Size and Performance: Angular Material's extensive set of pre-built components can lead to larger bundle sizes, impacting the performance of the application. Vuesax, with its modular design and lightweight components, offers better performance optimization and can result in smaller bundle sizes, making it a suitable choice for projects prioritizing performance.
Learning Curve: Angular Material, being tightly integrated with Angular, may require a steeper learning curve for developers who are new to the Angular ecosystem. In contrast, Vuesax, with its straightforward design and Vue.js compatibility, tends to have a more gentle learning curve, making it easier for developers familiar with Vue.js to get started with the framework.

In Summary, Angular Material is well-suited for Angular developers looking for a comprehensive set of pre-built Material Design components with strong community support, while Vuesax appeals to Vue.js developers seeking a more customizable approach with lightweight components and performance optimization capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Angular Material	Vuesax
Sprint from Zero to App. Hit the ground running with comprehensive, modern UI components that work across the web, mobile and desktop. It allows to create material styled angular apps fast and easy.	Vuesax is a framework of components based on vue js, it is a framework that is designed from scratch to be incrementally adoptable. The framework is focused on facilitating the development of applications, improving the design of the same without removing the necessary functionality. we want all the components to be independent in colors, shapes and design for a freedom that we like all front-end but without losing the speed of creation and production.
Easy to use ; comprehensive & modern UI components ; UI components work across the web, mobile and desktop; material styled angular apps fast and easy	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 24.9K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 6.8K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 624	Stacks 26
Followers 755	Followers 126
Votes 32	Votes 7
Pros & Cons
Pros 12 Components 8 Backed by a well known company 4 Simple 3 Easy 2 Very good documentation Cons 4 Fairly large 2 Shit 2 Look like 90s stuffs 2 Suck	Pros 7 Fresh design compare to well known Material Design
Integrations
Angular CLI Angular	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Angular Material , Vuesax?

Ant Design

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

Angular Universal

It executes on the server, generating static application pages that later get bootstrapped on the client. This means that the application generally renders more quickly, giving users a chance to view the application layout before it becomes fully interactive.

PrimeReact

PrimeReact is a rich set of open source UI Components for React.

React Router

React Router is a complete routing solution designed specifically for React.js. It painlessly synchronizes the components of your application with the URL, with first-class support for nesting, transitions, and server side rendering.

styled-components

Visual primitives for the component age. Use the best bits of ES6 and CSS to style your apps without stress 💅

Buefy

We like to think that Buefy is the javascript layer for your Bulma interface, since it doesn't require for it to be a sophisticated Single-Page Application. You can import it completely or single components on a ordinary webpage and use Vue.js as a replacement for jQuery.

Mantine

It is an MIT licensed open source React components and hooks library with a focus on usability, accessibility, and developer experience. You can build fully functional accessible web applications faster than ever – it includes more than 120 customizable components and hooks to cover you in any situation.

React Starter Kit

React Starter Kit is an opinionated boilerplate for web development built on top of Facebook's React library, Node.js / Express server and Flux architecture. Containing modern web development tools such as Webpack, Babel and BrowserSync.

Vue CLI

Vue CLI aims to be the standard tooling baseline for the Vue ecosystem. It ensures the various build tools work smoothly together with sensible defaults so you can focus on writing your app instead of spending days wrangling with config.

Emotion

Emotion is a performant and flexible CSS-in-JS library. Building on many other CSS-in-JS libraries, it allows you to style apps quickly with string or object styles. It has predictable composition to avoid specificity issues with CSS. With source maps and labels, Emotion has a great developer experience and great performance with heavy caching in production.

Related Comparisons

Angular Material vs Vuesax: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Language Compatibility: Angular Material is specifically designed for Angular, which means it is tightly integrated with Angular framework. On the other hand, Vuesax is built for Vue.js, providing seamless integration with Vue components and ecosystem, making it a preferred choice for Vue.js developers.
Component Design: Angular Material offers a rich set of pre-built Material Design components that adhere to Material Design guidelines. It provides ready-to-use components like buttons, menus, cards, etc., which can be easily implemented in Angular applications. Vuesax, on the other hand, offers a more customizable approach with its modular design, allowing developers to create unique UI components tailored to their specific project requirements.
Community Support: Angular Material benefits from the strong community support of Angular developers, providing a wealth of resources, tutorials, and plugins to enhance the framework's functionality. Vuesax, while not as widely adopted as Angular Material, has a growing community of Vue.js enthusiasts who contribute to the framework's development and offer assistance to fellow developers.
Customization Options: Angular Material comes with a more opinionated approach, offering a standardized set of design patterns and components based on the Material Design guidelines. While this streamlines the development process, it may limit the flexibility for customization. Vuesax, on the other hand, gives developers more flexibility to customize and style components, making it ideal for projects with unique design requirements.
Size and Performance: Angular Material's extensive set of pre-built components can lead to larger bundle sizes, impacting the performance of the application. Vuesax, with its modular design and lightweight components, offers better performance optimization and can result in smaller bundle sizes, making it a suitable choice for projects prioritizing performance.
Learning Curve: Angular Material, being tightly integrated with Angular, may require a steeper learning curve for developers who are new to the Angular ecosystem. In contrast, Vuesax, with its straightforward design and Vue.js compatibility, tends to have a more gentle learning curve, making it easier for developers familiar with Vue.js to get started with the framework.

Angular Material vs Vuesax

Overview