StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. In-Memory Databases
  4. In Memory Databases
  5. Apache Ignite vs MemSQL

Apache Ignite vs MemSQL

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

MemSQL
MemSQL
Stacks86
Followers184
Votes44
Apache Ignite
Apache Ignite
Stacks110
Followers168
Votes41
GitHub Stars5.0K
Forks1.9K

Apache Ignite vs MemSQL: What are the differences?

Introduction

Markdown code for the key differences between Apache Ignite and MemSQL will be provided below.

  1. Data Model: Apache Ignite is an in-memory computing platform that provides high-performance distributed data storage and processing capabilities, supporting both transactional and analytical workloads. It offers a flexible data model with support for key-value, SQL, and compute APIs. On the other hand, MemSQL is a distributed, in-memory, SQL database that excels at real-time ad hoc and transactional analytics. It has a relational data model, supporting SQL queries for data manipulation and retrieval.

  2. Scale-Out Architecture: Apache Ignite follows a scale-out architecture, allowing users to add more server nodes to expand the capacity and performance of the cluster. It is designed to horizontally scale across a large number of nodes, making it suitable for handling big data workloads. In contrast, MemSQL leverages a distributed, scalable architecture that combines a distributed SQL database with an in-memory storage engine to deliver high performance across large datasets.

  3. Memory Management: Apache Ignite uses a dynamic memory management system that allows users to define how much memory should be allocated to data storage, caching, and internal operations. Users can configure the memory settings based on specific requirements and available resources. MemSQL, being an in-memory database, stores data primarily in memory for faster access. It employs sophisticated memory management techniques to optimize data storage and processing within the available memory resources.

  4. SQL Compliance: Both Apache Ignite and MemSQL support SQL queries for data manipulation and retrieval. However, Apache Ignite provides ANSI SQL-99 compliance with support for additional SQL features like distributed joins, ACID transactions, and global indexes. MemSQL offers full SQL-92 compliance, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of existing SQL applications, tools, and drivers.

  5. Persistence Options: Apache Ignite supports various persistence options, allowing users to store data on disk or in a combination of memory and disk. It provides flexibility in configuring data durability and persistency, essential for scenarios requiring long-term data storage and recovery. MemSQL also offers persistent storage options but primarily relies on in-memory storage for optimal performance. Disk storage can be used for backup or as a fallback in case of memory limitations.

  6. Integration Capabilities: Apache Ignite provides extensive integration capabilities, allowing users to connect with various databases, data sources, and frameworks. It can be easily integrated with popular SQL, NoSQL, and Hadoop data sources, enabling seamless data ingestion and processing. MemSQL supports various integration options as well, providing connectors for streaming platforms, data pipelines, and analytics frameworks to facilitate real-time data ingestion and analysis.

In summary, Apache Ignite and MemSQL differ in their data models, scale-out architectures, memory management approaches, SQL compliance levels, persistence options, and integration capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

MemSQL
MemSQL
Apache Ignite
Apache Ignite

MemSQL converges transactions and analytics for sub-second data processing and reporting. Real-time businesses can build robust applications on a simple and scalable infrastructure that complements and extends existing data pipelines.

It is a memory-centric distributed database, caching, and processing platform for transactional, analytical, and streaming workloads delivering in-memory speeds at petabyte scale

ANSI SQL Support;Fully-distributed Joins;Compiled Queries; ACID Compliance;In-Memory Tables;On-Disk Tables; Massively Parallel Execution;Lock Free Data Structures;JSON Support; High Availability; Online Backup and Restore;Online Replication
Memory-Centric Storage; Distributed SQL; Distributed Key-Value
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
5.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.9K
Stacks
86
Stacks
110
Followers
184
Followers
168
Votes
44
Votes
41
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Distributed
  • 5
    Realtime
  • 4
    Concurrent
  • 4
    Columnstore
  • 4
    Sql
Pros
  • 5
    Multiple client language support
  • 5
    High Avaliability
  • 5
    Free
  • 5
    Written in java. runs on jvm
  • 4
    Load balancing
Integrations
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
MySQL
MySQL
QlikView
QlikView
MongoDB
MongoDB
MySQL
MySQL
Apache Spark
Apache Spark

What are some alternatives to MemSQL, Apache Ignite?

Redis

Redis

Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.

Hazelcast

Hazelcast

With its various distributed data structures, distributed caching capabilities, elastic nature, memcache support, integration with Spring and Hibernate and more importantly with so many happy users, Hazelcast is feature-rich, enterprise-ready and developer-friendly in-memory data grid solution.

Aerospike

Aerospike

Aerospike is an open-source, modern database built from the ground up to push the limits of flash storage, processors and networks. It was designed to operate with predictable low latency at high throughput with uncompromising reliability – both high availability and ACID guarantees.

SAP HANA

SAP HANA

It is an application that uses in-memory database technology that allows the processing of massive amounts of real-time data in a short time. The in-memory computing engine allows it to process data stored in RAM as opposed to reading it from a disk.

VoltDB

VoltDB

VoltDB is a fundamental redesign of the RDBMS that provides unparalleled performance and scalability on bare-metal, virtualized and cloud infrastructures. VoltDB is a modern in-memory architecture that supports both SQL + Java with data durability and fault tolerance.

Tarantool

Tarantool

It is designed to give you the flexibility, scalability, and performance that you want, as well as the reliability and manageability that you need in mission-critical applications

Azure Redis Cache

Azure Redis Cache

It perfectly complements Azure database services such as Cosmos DB. It provides a cost-effective solution to scale read and write throughput of your data tier. Store and share database query results, session states, static contents, and more using a common cache-aside pattern.

KeyDB

KeyDB

KeyDB is a fully open source database that aims to make use of all hardware resources. KeyDB makes it possible to breach boundaries often dictated by price and complexity.

LokiJS

LokiJS

LokiJS is a document oriented database written in javascript, published under MIT License. Its purpose is to store javascript objects as documents in a nosql fashion and retrieve them with a similar mechanism. Runs in node (including cordova/phonegap and node-webkit), nativescript and the browser.

BuntDB

BuntDB

BuntDB is a low-level, in-memory, key/value store in pure Go. It persists to disk, is ACID compliant, and uses locking for multiple readers and a single writer. It supports custom indexes and geospatial data. It's ideal for projects that need a dependable database and favor speed over data size.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase