StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. In-Memory Databases
  4. In Memory Databases
  5. Apache Ignite vs Redis

Apache Ignite vs Redis

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Redis
Redis
Stacks61.9K
Followers46.5K
Votes3.9K
GitHub Stars42
Forks6
Apache Ignite
Apache Ignite
Stacks110
Followers168
Votes41
GitHub Stars5.0K
Forks1.9K

Apache Ignite vs Redis: What are the differences?

Apache Ignite and Redis are both in-memory data storage systems that offer high-performance and scalability. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Data Model: Apache Ignite offers a flexible data model that supports key-value, SQL, and compute grid functionalities. It allows users to store and manipulate complex structured data using SQL queries, distributed compute operations, and in-memory key-value stores. On the other hand, Redis primarily focuses on a simple key-value data model, offering basic data structures like strings, lists, sets, and hashes.

  2. Durability: Apache Ignite provides durability by automatically storing data in memory as well as on disk, ensuring data persistence even after system restarts or failures. It supports write-ahead logging, replication, and data partitioning across the cluster. While Redis also supports data persistence, it typically relies on periodic snapshots and append-only log files for durability, which may result in some data loss in case of system failures.

  3. Scalability: Apache Ignite offers horizontal scalability by distributing data across the cluster nodes using data partitioning techniques. It can handle much larger datasets and higher workloads by leveraging distributed computing capabilities. Redis, on the other hand, has a single-threaded architecture that can limit its scalability for certain use cases, although it offers a clustering feature to scale out by sharding data across multiple nodes.

  4. Supported Data Types: Redis provides a rich set of built-in data structures like strings, lists, sets, sorted sets, and hashes, allowing users to perform various operations on these data types. Apache Ignite, in addition to key-value operations, supports more complex data structures like collections, maps, and SQL tables, enabling users to perform advanced computations and queries on the stored data.

  5. Persistence Options: Redis offers different persistence options, including both snapshotting and append-only log files (AOF). Users can choose between these options based on their requirements for data durability and recovery. Apache Ignite, on the other hand, supports write-ahead logging to ensure data durability and provides multiple choices for storage, including in-memory, disk-based, or a combination of both, allowing users to optimize performance and persistence based on their specific needs.

  6. Parallel Query Processing: Apache Ignite supports distributed SQL queries, allowing users to execute complex queries across the entire dataset in a parallel and distributed manner. It leverages its distributed computing capabilities to optimize query processing and achieve faster query response times. Redis, on the other hand, does not provide built-in support for distributed SQL queries and primarily focuses on key-value operations.

In summary, Apache Ignite is a distributed in-memory computing platform that integrates with existing data sources and provides features like distributed caching, compute grid, and streaming processing, making it suitable for large-scale, high-performance data processing and analytics. Redis, on the other hand, is an open-source, in-memory data structure store known for its simplicity, speed, and versatility, primarily used for caching, real-time analytics, and message brokering in web applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Redis
Redis
Apache Ignite
Apache Ignite

Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.

It is a memory-centric distributed database, caching, and processing platform for transactional, analytical, and streaming workloads delivering in-memory speeds at petabyte scale

-
Memory-Centric Storage; Distributed SQL; Distributed Key-Value
Statistics
GitHub Stars
42
GitHub Stars
5.0K
GitHub Forks
6
GitHub Forks
1.9K
Stacks
61.9K
Stacks
110
Followers
46.5K
Followers
168
Votes
3.9K
Votes
41
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 888
    Performance
  • 542
    Super fast
  • 514
    Ease of use
  • 444
    In-memory cache
  • 324
    Advanced key-value cache
Cons
  • 15
    Cannot query objects directly
  • 3
    No secondary indexes for non-numeric data types
  • 1
    No WAL
Pros
  • 5
    Free
  • 5
    Multiple client language support
  • 5
    Written in java. runs on jvm
  • 5
    High Avaliability
  • 4
    Load balancing
Integrations
No integrations available
MongoDB
MongoDB
MySQL
MySQL
Apache Spark
Apache Spark

What are some alternatives to Redis, Apache Ignite?

Hazelcast

Hazelcast

With its various distributed data structures, distributed caching capabilities, elastic nature, memcache support, integration with Spring and Hibernate and more importantly with so many happy users, Hazelcast is feature-rich, enterprise-ready and developer-friendly in-memory data grid solution.

Aerospike

Aerospike

Aerospike is an open-source, modern database built from the ground up to push the limits of flash storage, processors and networks. It was designed to operate with predictable low latency at high throughput with uncompromising reliability – both high availability and ACID guarantees.

MemSQL

MemSQL

MemSQL converges transactions and analytics for sub-second data processing and reporting. Real-time businesses can build robust applications on a simple and scalable infrastructure that complements and extends existing data pipelines.

SAP HANA

SAP HANA

It is an application that uses in-memory database technology that allows the processing of massive amounts of real-time data in a short time. The in-memory computing engine allows it to process data stored in RAM as opposed to reading it from a disk.

VoltDB

VoltDB

VoltDB is a fundamental redesign of the RDBMS that provides unparalleled performance and scalability on bare-metal, virtualized and cloud infrastructures. VoltDB is a modern in-memory architecture that supports both SQL + Java with data durability and fault tolerance.

Tarantool

Tarantool

It is designed to give you the flexibility, scalability, and performance that you want, as well as the reliability and manageability that you need in mission-critical applications

Azure Redis Cache

Azure Redis Cache

It perfectly complements Azure database services such as Cosmos DB. It provides a cost-effective solution to scale read and write throughput of your data tier. Store and share database query results, session states, static contents, and more using a common cache-aside pattern.

KeyDB

KeyDB

KeyDB is a fully open source database that aims to make use of all hardware resources. KeyDB makes it possible to breach boundaries often dictated by price and complexity.

LokiJS

LokiJS

LokiJS is a document oriented database written in javascript, published under MIT License. Its purpose is to store javascript objects as documents in a nosql fashion and retrieve them with a similar mechanism. Runs in node (including cordova/phonegap and node-webkit), nativescript and the browser.

BuntDB

BuntDB

BuntDB is a low-level, in-memory, key/value store in pure Go. It persists to disk, is ACID compliant, and uses locking for multiple readers and a single writer. It supports custom indexes and geospatial data. It's ideal for projects that need a dependable database and favor speed over data size.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase