Alternatives to Bootstrap Studio logo

Alternatives to Bootstrap Studio

Pingendo, Webflow, Macaw, Mobirise, and Adobe Dreamweaver are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Bootstrap Studio.
177
713
+ 1
31

What is Bootstrap Studio and what are its top alternatives?

Bootstrap Studio is a robust web design tool that allows users to create responsive websites using Bootstrap framework without writing any code. It provides a drag-and-drop interface along with a range of pre-designed components, templates, and themes. However, Bootstrap Studio has limitations in terms of customization options and may not be suitable for advanced users who require more flexibility in design.

  1. Webflow: Webflow is a popular alternative to Bootstrap Studio that allows users to design and publish websites visually. It offers a powerful and intuitive interface for creating responsive sites with advanced interactions and animations. Pros: Extensive design control, CMS integration. Cons: Steep learning curve, limited free plan.
  2. Froont: Froont is a web design tool that enables users to create responsive websites collaboratively in the browser. It offers a WYSIWYG editor with real-time preview and supports custom code integration. Pros: Easy collaboration, mobile-first approach. Cons: Limited template library, pricing may be high for some users.
  3. Pingendo: Pingendo is a simple yet powerful Bootstrap-based visual design tool that allows users to create responsive websites quickly. It offers a drag-and-drop interface with live preview and code editing capabilities. Pros: Lightweight, affordable pricing. Cons: Limited advanced features, smaller user base.
  4. Macaw: Macaw is a web design tool that combines the ease of visual design with the flexibility of code editing. It provides a fluid and intuitive interface for creating responsive websites with semantic HTML and CSS. Pros: Code-friendly design tools, flexible grid system. Cons: No longer actively maintained, may lack some advanced features.
  5. Elementor: Elementor is a popular WordPress page builder plugin that allows users to design custom websites visually. It offers a range of pre-designed templates, widgets, and advanced features for creating responsive sites. Pros: Seamless WordPress integration, extensive template library. Cons: Limited outside of WordPress, may have performance issues with excessive use of widgets.
  6. Mobirise: Mobirise is a free Bootstrap-based website builder software that enables users to create responsive sites without coding. It offers a drag-and-drop interface with a library of themes, blocks, and extensions. Pros: Easy to use, offline capabilities. Cons: Limited customization options, may lack advanced features for some users.
  7. Blocs: Blocs is a Mac-based visual web design tool that allows users to create responsive websites using a simple interface. It offers a range of design tools and features for customizing layout, typography, and animations. Pros: Mac-specific design capabilities, intuitive workflow. Cons: Limited to Mac users, may lack some advanced features found in other tools.
  8. Antetype: Antetype is a design tool that focuses on creating responsive UI designs for web and mobile applications. It offers a comprehensive set of interactive components and design features for prototyping websites with precision. Pros: Advanced design capabilities, reusable design patterns. Cons: Steeper learning curve, may be overkill for simple websites.
  9. Adobe XD: Adobe XD is a design tool that allows users to create interactive prototypes and designs for websites and applications. It offers comprehensive design tools, collaboration features, and integration with other Adobe products. Pros: Cross-platform, robust design capabilities. Cons: Subscription-based pricing, may have a learning curve for beginners.
  10. Sketch: Sketch is a popular design tool for creating websites, mobile apps, and interfaces. It offers a range of design tools, plugins, and collaboration features for designing responsive layouts and prototypes. Pros: Extensive plugin ecosystem, intuitive interface. Cons: Mac-only, may require additional plugins for some advanced features.

Top Alternatives to Bootstrap Studio

  • Pingendo
    Pingendo

    Create quality HTML prototypes quickly, using popular open source tools like Bootstrap, LESS, Fontawesome and more. ...

  • Webflow
    Webflow

    Webflow is a responsive design tool that lets you design, build, and publish websites in an intuitive interface. Clean code included! ...

  • Macaw
    Macaw

    It provides the same flexibility as your favorite image editor but also writes semantic HTML and remarkably succinct CSS. It's time to expect more from a web design tool. ...

  • Mobirise
    Mobirise

    It is a freeware web design application that allows users to create and publish bootstrap websites, without coding. It is essentially a drag and drop website builder, featuring various website themes. ...

  • Adobe Dreamweaver
    Adobe Dreamweaver

    It gives you faster, easier ways to design, code and publish websites and web applications that look amazing on any size screen. Create, code and manage dynamic websites easily with a smart, simplified coding engine. Access code hints to quickly learn and edit HTML, CSS and other web standards. And use visual aids to reduce errors and speed up site development. ...

  • Visual Studio Code
    Visual Studio Code

    Build and debug modern web and cloud applications. Code is free and available on your favorite platform - Linux, Mac OSX, and Windows. ...

  • WordPress
    WordPress

    The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family. ...

  • Figma
    Figma

    Figma is the first interface design tool with real-time collaboration. It keeps everyone on the same page. Focus on the work instead of fighting your tools. ...

Bootstrap Studio alternatives & related posts

Pingendo logo

Pingendo

33
4
Free, simple app for Bootstrap prototyping
33
4
PROS OF PINGENDO
  • 4
    It is free
CONS OF PINGENDO
  • 1
    Branded pages

related Pingendo posts

Webflow logo

Webflow

776
52
Build responsive websites visually
776
52
PROS OF WEBFLOW
  • 13
    Interactions and Animations
  • 7
    Builds clean code in the background
  • 7
    Fast development of html and css layouts/design
  • 6
    Free plan
  • 6
    Fully Customizable
  • 5
    Simple
  • 4
    Prototype
  • 2
    Built on web standards
  • 2
    Next Gen
CONS OF WEBFLOW
  • 1
    Freemium
  • 1
    No Audio Support

related Webflow posts

Roman Eaton
Product Manager at Carrrot · | 9 upvotes · 77.5K views

We chose Webflow to build up websites faster and to make possible for particular employees to fix some misspellings or add an easy element to the page on their own - it is like Adobe Photoshop. To work with the incoming traffic we use our own product, that I can't pin here. It helps to make nurture visitors from the first session into the signing up and further activation into the product. In addition to @Carrrot we use Google Analytics to traffic source awareness, to monitor customers inside the product FullStory helps is a lot with its fury clicking and abandoned links. Activation and retention are done by our own product through the pop-ups, live chat, and emails that all based on customer behavior.

See more

I would like to build a community-based customer review platform for a niche industry where users can sign up for a forum, as well as post detailed reviews of their experience with a company/product, including a rating system for pre-selected features. Something like niche.com or areavibes.com with curated information/data, ratings, reviews, and comparison functionalities.

Is this possible to build using no-code tools? I have read about the possibility of using Webflow with Memberstack, Airtable, and Elfsight through Zapier / Integromat, which may allow for good design and functionality. Is it possible with Bubble or Bildr?

I have no problems with a bit of a learning curve as long as what I want is possible. Since I have 0 coding experience, I am not sure how to go about it.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated!

See more
Macaw logo

Macaw

5
0
The code-savvy web design tool
5
0
PROS OF MACAW
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF MACAW
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Macaw posts

      Mobirise logo

      Mobirise

      38
      2
      Create awesome responsive websites
      38
      2
      PROS OF MOBIRISE
      • 1
        Live preview on local network
      • 1
        One click export to HTML
      CONS OF MOBIRISE
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Mobirise posts

        Adobe Dreamweaver logo

        Adobe Dreamweaver

        157
        17
        A proprietary web development tool
        157
        17
        PROS OF ADOBE DREAMWEAVER
        • 3
          FTP
        • 2
          All-in-one
        • 2
          Modern code editor
        • 2
          Visual editor
        • 2
          Built-in dev tools
        • 2
          Website management
        • 2
          Real-time preview
        • 1
          Has a Browser Preview
        • 1
          Has a Built in Live Preview
        CONS OF ADOBE DREAMWEAVER
        • 2
          Does not have a user-friendly UI
        • 2
          Is not cheap
        • 1
          Slow and sluggish to use

        related Adobe Dreamweaver posts

        Visual Studio Code logo

        Visual Studio Code

        181.3K
        2.3K
        Build and debug modern web and cloud applications, by Microsoft
        181.3K
        2.3K
        PROS OF VISUAL STUDIO CODE
        • 340
          Powerful multilanguage IDE
        • 308
          Fast
        • 193
          Front-end develop out of the box
        • 158
          Support TypeScript IntelliSense
        • 142
          Very basic but free
        • 126
          Git integration
        • 106
          Intellisense
        • 78
          Faster than Atom
        • 53
          Better ui, easy plugins, and nice git integration
        • 45
          Great Refactoring Tools
        • 44
          Good Plugins
        • 42
          Terminal
        • 38
          Superb markdown support
        • 36
          Open Source
        • 35
          Extensions
        • 26
          Awesome UI
        • 26
          Large & up-to-date extension community
        • 24
          Powerful and fast
        • 22
          Portable
        • 18
          Best code editor
        • 18
          Best editor
        • 17
          Easy to get started with
        • 15
          Lots of extensions
        • 15
          Good for begginers
        • 15
          Crossplatform
        • 15
          Built on Electron
        • 14
          Extensions for everything
        • 14
          Open, cross-platform, fast, monthly updates
        • 14
          All Languages Support
        • 13
          Easy to use and learn
        • 12
          "fast, stable & easy to use"
        • 12
          Extensible
        • 11
          Ui design is great
        • 11
          Totally customizable
        • 11
          Git out of the box
        • 11
          Useful for begginer
        • 11
          Faster edit for slow computer
        • 10
          SSH support
        • 10
          Great community
        • 10
          Fast Startup
        • 9
          Works With Almost EveryThing You Need
        • 9
          Great language support
        • 9
          Powerful Debugger
        • 9
          It has terminal and there are lots of shortcuts in it
        • 8
          Can compile and run .py files
        • 8
          Python extension is fast
        • 7
          Features rich
        • 7
          Great document formater
        • 6
          He is not Michael
        • 6
          Extension Echosystem
        • 6
          She is not Rachel
        • 6
          Awesome multi cursor support
        • 5
          VSCode.pro Course makes it easy to learn
        • 5
          Language server client
        • 5
          SFTP Workspace
        • 5
          Very proffesional
        • 5
          Easy azure
        • 4
          Has better support and more extentions for debugging
        • 4
          Supports lots of operating systems
        • 4
          Excellent as git difftool and mergetool
        • 4
          Virtualenv integration
        • 3
          Better autocompletes than Atom
        • 3
          Has more than enough languages for any developer
        • 3
          'batteries included'
        • 3
          More tools to integrate with vs
        • 3
          Emmet preinstalled
        • 2
          VS Code Server: Browser version of VS Code
        • 2
          CMake support with autocomplete
        • 2
          Microsoft
        • 2
          Customizable
        • 2
          Light
        • 2
          Big extension marketplace
        • 2
          Fast and ruby is built right in
        • 1
          File:///C:/Users/ydemi/Downloads/yuksel_demirkaya_webpa
        CONS OF VISUAL STUDIO CODE
        • 46
          Slow startup
        • 29
          Resource hog at times
        • 20
          Poor refactoring
        • 13
          Poor UI Designer
        • 11
          Weak Ui design tools
        • 10
          Poor autocomplete
        • 8
          Super Slow
        • 8
          Huge cpu usage with few installed extension
        • 8
          Microsoft sends telemetry data
        • 7
          Poor in PHP
        • 6
          It's MicroSoft
        • 3
          Poor in Python
        • 3
          No Built in Browser Preview
        • 3
          No color Intergrator
        • 3
          Very basic for java development and buggy at times
        • 3
          No built in live Preview
        • 3
          Electron
        • 2
          Bad Plugin Architecture
        • 2
          Powered by Electron
        • 1
          Terminal does not identify path vars sometimes
        • 1
          Slow C++ Language Server

        related Visual Studio Code posts

        Yshay Yaacobi

        Our first experience with .NET core was when we developed our OSS feature management platform - Tweek (https://github.com/soluto/tweek). We wanted to create a solution that is able to run anywhere (super important for OSS), has excellent performance characteristics and can fit in a multi-container architecture. We decided to implement our rule engine processor in F# , our main service was implemented in C# and other components were built using JavaScript / TypeScript and Go.

        Visual Studio Code worked really well for us as well, it worked well with all our polyglot services and the .Net core integration had great cross-platform developer experience (to be fair, F# was a bit trickier) - actually, each of our team members used a different OS (Ubuntu, macos, windows). Our production deployment ran for a time on Docker Swarm until we've decided to adopt Kubernetes with almost seamless migration process.

        After our positive experience of running .Net core workloads in containers and developing Tweek's .Net services on non-windows machines, C# had gained back some of its popularity (originally lost to Node.js), and other teams have been using it for developing microservices, k8s sidecars (like https://github.com/Soluto/airbag), cli tools, serverless functions and other projects...

        See more
        Simon Reymann
        Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 30 upvotes · 12M views

        Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

        • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
        • Respectively Git as revision control system
        • SourceTree as Git GUI
        • Visual Studio Code as IDE
        • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
        • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
        • SonarQube as quality gate
        • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
        • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
        • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
        • Heroku for deploying in test environments
        • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
        • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
        • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
        • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
        • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

        The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

        • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
        • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
        • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
        • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
        • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
        • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
        See more
        WordPress logo

        WordPress

        98.1K
        2.1K
        A semantic personal publishing platform with a focus on aesthetics, web standards, and usability.
        98.1K
        2.1K
        PROS OF WORDPRESS
        • 416
          Customizable
        • 367
          Easy to manage
        • 354
          Plugins & themes
        • 259
          Non-tech colleagues can update website content
        • 247
          Really powerful
        • 145
          Rapid website development
        • 78
          Best documentation
        • 51
          Codex
        • 44
          Product feature set
        • 35
          Custom/internal social network
        • 18
          Open source
        • 8
          Great for all types of websites
        • 7
          Huge install and user base
        • 5
          I like it like I like a kick in the groin
        • 5
          It's simple and easy to use by any novice
        • 5
          Perfect example of user collaboration
        • 5
          Open Source Community
        • 5
          Most websites make use of it
        • 5
          Best
        • 4
          API-based CMS
        • 4
          Community
        • 3
          Easy To use
        • 2
          <a href="https://secure.wphackedhel">Easy Beginner</a>
        CONS OF WORDPRESS
        • 13
          Hard to keep up-to-date if you customize things
        • 13
          Plugins are of mixed quality
        • 10
          Not best backend UI
        • 2
          Complex Organization
        • 1
          Do not cover all the basics in the core
        • 1
          Great Security

        related WordPress posts

        Dale Ross
        Independent Contractor at Self Employed · | 22 upvotes · 1.7M views

        I've heard that I have the ability to write well, at times. When it flows, it flows. I decided to start blogging in 2013 on Blogger. I started a company and joined BizPark with the Microsoft Azure allotment. I created a WordPress blog and did a migration at some point. A lot happened in the time after that migration but I stopped coding and changed cities during tumultuous times that taught me many lessons concerning mental health and productivity. I eventually graduated from BizSpark and outgrew the credit allotment. That killed the WordPress blog.

        I blogged about writing again on the existing Blogger blog but it didn't feel right. I looked at a few options where I wouldn't have to worry about hosting cost indefinitely and Jekyll stood out with GitHub Pages. The Importer was fairly straightforward for the existing blog posts.

        Todo * Set up redirects for all posts on blogger. The URI format is different so a complete redirect wouldn't work. Although, there may be something in Jekyll that could manage the redirects. I did notice the old URLs were stored in the front matter. I'm working on a command-line Ruby gem for the current plan. * I did find some of the lost WordPress posts on archive.org that I downloaded with the waybackmachinedownloader. I think I might write an importer for that. * I still have a few Disqus comment threads to map

        See more
        Shared insights
        on
        ElementorElementorWordPressWordPress

        hello guys, I need your help. I created a website, I've been using Elementor forever, but yesterday I bought a template after I made the purchase I knew I made a mistake, cause the template was in HTML, can anyone please show me how to put this HTML template in my WordPress so it will be the face of my website, thank you in advance.

        See more
        Figma logo

        Figma

        4.1K
        101
        The collaborative interface design tool.
        4.1K
        101
        PROS OF FIGMA
        • 19
          Web-based application
        • 11
          Intuitive interface and perfect collaboration
        • 9
          Free software
        • 8
          Highly Collaborative
        • 8
          Works on both Mac and Windows
        • 7
          Great plugins, easy to extend
        • 6
          Large community, tutorials, documentation
        • 6
          Hands done the best design tool for collaboration!
        • 6
          Works on multiple OS's
        • 6
          Imports Sketch files
        • 5
          Prototyping, design files and comments all in one place
        • 5
          Interactive, event-based prototypes
        • 4
          No more syncing between Sketch and InVision
        • 1
          Import XD files
        CONS OF FIGMA
        • 6
          Limited Export options

        related Figma posts

        Jonathan Pugh
        Software Engineer / Project Manager / Technical Architect · | 25 upvotes · 3.1M views

        I needed to choose a full stack of tools for cross platform mobile application design & development. After much research and trying different tools, these are what I came up with that work for me today:

        For the client coding I chose Framework7 because of its performance, easy learning curve, and very well designed, beautiful UI widgets. I think it's perfect for solo development or small teams. I didn't like React Native. It felt heavy to me and rigid. Framework7 allows the use of #CSS3, which I think is the best technology to come out of the #WWW movement. No other tech has been able to allow designers and developers to develop such flexible, high performance, customisable user interface elements that are highly responsive and hardware accelerated before. Now #CSS3 includes variables and flexboxes it is truly a powerful language and there is no longer a need for preprocessors such as #SCSS / #Sass / #less. React Native contains a very limited interpretation of #CSS3 which I found very frustrating after using #CSS3 for some years already and knowing its powerful features. The other very nice feature of Framework7 is that you can even build for the browser if you want your app to be available for desktop web browsers. The latest release also includes the ability to build for #Electron so you can have MacOS, Windows and Linux desktop apps. This is not possible with React Native yet.

        Framework7 runs on top of Apache Cordova. Cordova and webviews have been slated as being slow in the past. Having a game developer background I found the tweeks to make it run as smooth as silk. One of those tweeks is to use WKWebView. Another important one was using srcset on images.

        I use #Template7 for the for the templating system which is a no-nonsense mobile-centric #HandleBars style extensible templating system. It's easy to write custom helpers for, is fast and has a small footprint. I'm not forced into a new paradigm or learning some new syntax. It operates with standard JavaScript, HTML5 and CSS 3. It's written by the developer of Framework7 and so dovetails with it as expected.

        I configured TypeScript to work with the latest version of Framework7. I consider TypeScript to be one of the best creations to come out of Microsoft in some time. They must have an amazing team working on it. It's very powerful and flexible. It helps you catch a lot of bugs and also provides code completion in supporting IDEs. So for my IDE I use Visual Studio Code which is a blazingly fast and silky smooth editor that integrates seamlessly with TypeScript for the ultimate type checking setup (both products are produced by Microsoft).

        I use Webpack and Babel to compile the JavaScript. TypeScript can compile to JavaScript directly but Babel offers a few more options and polyfills so you can use the latest (and even prerelease) JavaScript features today and compile to be backwards compatible with virtually any browser. My favorite recent addition is "optional chaining" which greatly simplifies and increases readability of a number of sections of my code dealing with getting and setting data in nested objects.

        I use some Ruby scripts to process images with ImageMagick and pngquant to optimise for size and even auto insert responsive image code into the HTML5. Ruby is the ultimate cross platform scripting language. Even as your scripts become large, Ruby allows you to refactor your code easily and make it Object Oriented if necessary. I find it the quickest and easiest way to maintain certain aspects of my build process.

        For the user interface design and prototyping I use Figma. Figma has an almost identical user interface to #Sketch but has the added advantage of being cross platform (MacOS and Windows). Its real-time collaboration features are outstanding and I use them a often as I work mostly on remote projects. Clients can collaborate in real-time and see changes I make as I make them. The clickable prototyping features in Figma are also very well designed and mean I can send clickable prototypes to clients to try user interface updates as they are made and get immediate feedback. I'm currently also evaluating the latest version of #AdobeXD as an alternative to Figma as it has the very cool auto-animate feature. It doesn't have real-time collaboration yet, but I heard it is proposed for 2019.

        For the UI icons I use Font Awesome Pro. They have the largest selection and best looking icons you can find on the internet with several variations in styles so you can find most of the icons you want for standard projects.

        For the backend I was using the #GraphCool Framework. As I later found out, #GraphQL still has some way to go in order to provide the full power of a mature graph query language so later in my project I ripped out #GraphCool and replaced it with CouchDB and Pouchdb. Primarily so I could provide good offline app support. CouchDB with Pouchdb is very flexible and efficient combination and overcomes some of the restrictions I found in #GraphQL and hence #GraphCool also. The most impressive and important feature of CouchDB is its replication. You can configure it in various ways for backups, fault tolerance, caching or conditional merging of databases. CouchDB and Pouchdb even supports storing, retrieving and serving binary or image data or other mime types. This removes a level of complexity usually present in database implementations where binary or image data is usually referenced through an #HTML5 link. With CouchDB and Pouchdb apps can operate offline and sync later, very efficiently, when the network connection is good.

        I use PhoneGap when testing the app. It auto-reloads your app when its code is changed and you can also install it on Android phones to preview your app instantly. iOS is a bit more tricky cause of Apple's policies so it's not available on the App Store, but you can build it and install it yourself to your device.

        So that's my latest mobile stack. What tools do you use? Have you tried these ones?

        See more
        Adam Neary

        The tool we use for editing UI is React Storybook. It is the perfect place to make sure your work aligns with designs to the pixel across breakpoints. You get fast hot module reloading and a couple checkboxes to enable/disable browser features like Flexbox.

        The only tricks I apply to Storybook are loading the stories with the mock data we’ve extracted from the API. If your mock data really covers all the various various possible states for your UI, you are good to go. Beyond that, if you have alternative states you want to account for, perhaps loading or error states, you can add them in manually.

        This is the crux of the matter for Storybook. This file is entirely generated from Yeoman (discussed below), and it delivers the examples from the Alps Journey by default. getSectionsFromJourney() just filters the sections.

        One other hack you’ll notice is that I added a pair of divs to bookend my component vertically, since Storybook renders with whitespace around the component. That is fine for buttons or UI with borders, but it’s hard to tell precisely where your component starts and ends, so I hacked them in there.

        Since we are talking about how all these fabulous tools work so well together to help you be productive, can I just say what a delight it is to work on UI with Zeplin or Figma side by side with Storybook. Digging into UI in this abstract way takes all the chaos of this madcap world away one breakpoint at a time, and in that quiet realm, you are good down to the pixel every time.

        To supply Storybook and our unit tests with realistic mock data, we want to extract the mock data directly from our Shared Development Environment. As with codegen, even a small change in a query fragment should also trigger many small changes in mock data. And here, similarly, the hard part is tackled entirely by Apollo CLI, and you can stitch it together with your own code in no time.

        Coming back to Zeplin and Figma briefly, they're both built to allow engineers to extract content directly to facilitate product development.

        Extracting the copy for an entire paragraph is as simple as selecting the content in Zeplin and clicking the “copy” icon in the Content section of the sidebar. In the case of Zeplin, images can be extracted by selecting and clicking the “download” icon in the Assets section of the sidebar.

        ReactDesignStack #StorybookStack #StorybookDesignStack
        See more