StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. In-Memory Databases
  4. In Memory Databases
  5. BuntDB vs Redis

BuntDB vs Redis

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Redis
Redis
Stacks61.9K
Followers46.5K
Votes3.9K
GitHub Stars42
Forks6
BuntDB
BuntDB
Stacks8
Followers16
Votes1
GitHub Stars4.8K
Forks299

BuntDB vs Redis: What are the differences?

  1. 1. Data Structure:

    • BuntDB:
      • BuntDB is a simple key-value store that persists data to disk.
      • It uses a B+ tree data structure to organize and retrieve data efficiently.
    • Redis:
      • Redis is an in-memory data structure store that can be used as a database, cache, and message broker.
      • It supports various data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, and sorted sets.
  2. 2. Persistence:

    • BuntDB:
      • BuntDB persists data to a disk-based file, allowing data to be retained even after restarting the application.
      • It writes data to disk asynchronously, providing better performance.
    • Redis:
      • Redis primarily stores data in memory for performance reasons.
      • It offers various persistence options such as snapshotting and append-only file (AOF) for data durability.
  3. 3. Scalability:

    • BuntDB:
      • BuntDB is designed to work on a single machine and does not have built-in support for distributed systems.
      • It is suitable for applications that require a lightweight and easy-to-use data store.
    • Redis:
      • Redis is built to be highly scalable and can be used in a distributed environment.
      • It supports replication and clustering to enable high availability and horizontal scaling.
  4. 4. Querying:

    • BuntDB:
      • BuntDB provides basic querying capabilities, allowing users to retrieve data based on the key.
      • It does not offer advanced querying features like indexing or secondary indexes.
    • Redis:
      • Redis supports a rich set of commands for querying data, including pattern matching, range queries, and set operations.
      • It also supports indexing and secondary indexes, enabling more complex queries.
  5. 5. Data Types:

    • BuntDB:
      • BuntDB supports only key-value pairs and does not have built-in support for different data types.
      • Users need to handle data serialization and deserialization manually.
    • Redis:
      • Redis supports various data types such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, and sorted sets.
      • Each data type has its own set of commands and operations.
  6. 6. Performance:

    • BuntDB:
      • BuntDB is optimized for high-performance read and write operations on a single machine.
      • It can achieve very low latency and high throughput for in-memory operations.
    • Redis:
      • Redis is known for its exceptional performance, especially for in-memory operations.
      • Its efficient data structures and in-memory processing make it suitable for applications requiring high-performance data manipulation.

In Summary, BuntDB is a simple key-value store with disk persistence and limited querying capabilities, while Redis is a versatile in-memory data structure store designed for scalability, advanced querying, and various data types with exceptional performance.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Redis
Redis
BuntDB
BuntDB

Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.

BuntDB is a low-level, in-memory, key/value store in pure Go. It persists to disk, is ACID compliant, and uses locking for multiple readers and a single writer. It supports custom indexes and geospatial data. It's ideal for projects that need a dependable database and favor speed over data size.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
42
GitHub Stars
4.8K
GitHub Forks
6
GitHub Forks
299
Stacks
61.9K
Stacks
8
Followers
46.5K
Followers
16
Votes
3.9K
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 888
    Performance
  • 542
    Super fast
  • 514
    Ease of use
  • 444
    In-memory cache
  • 324
    Advanced key-value cache
Cons
  • 15
    Cannot query objects directly
  • 3
    No secondary indexes for non-numeric data types
  • 1
    No WAL
Pros
  • 1
    Fast

What are some alternatives to Redis, BuntDB?

Hazelcast

Hazelcast

With its various distributed data structures, distributed caching capabilities, elastic nature, memcache support, integration with Spring and Hibernate and more importantly with so many happy users, Hazelcast is feature-rich, enterprise-ready and developer-friendly in-memory data grid solution.

Aerospike

Aerospike

Aerospike is an open-source, modern database built from the ground up to push the limits of flash storage, processors and networks. It was designed to operate with predictable low latency at high throughput with uncompromising reliability – both high availability and ACID guarantees.

MemSQL

MemSQL

MemSQL converges transactions and analytics for sub-second data processing and reporting. Real-time businesses can build robust applications on a simple and scalable infrastructure that complements and extends existing data pipelines.

Apache Ignite

Apache Ignite

It is a memory-centric distributed database, caching, and processing platform for transactional, analytical, and streaming workloads delivering in-memory speeds at petabyte scale

SAP HANA

SAP HANA

It is an application that uses in-memory database technology that allows the processing of massive amounts of real-time data in a short time. The in-memory computing engine allows it to process data stored in RAM as opposed to reading it from a disk.

VoltDB

VoltDB

VoltDB is a fundamental redesign of the RDBMS that provides unparalleled performance and scalability on bare-metal, virtualized and cloud infrastructures. VoltDB is a modern in-memory architecture that supports both SQL + Java with data durability and fault tolerance.

Tarantool

Tarantool

It is designed to give you the flexibility, scalability, and performance that you want, as well as the reliability and manageability that you need in mission-critical applications

Azure Redis Cache

Azure Redis Cache

It perfectly complements Azure database services such as Cosmos DB. It provides a cost-effective solution to scale read and write throughput of your data tier. Store and share database query results, session states, static contents, and more using a common cache-aside pattern.

KeyDB

KeyDB

KeyDB is a fully open source database that aims to make use of all hardware resources. KeyDB makes it possible to breach boundaries often dictated by price and complexity.

LokiJS

LokiJS

LokiJS is a document oriented database written in javascript, published under MIT License. Its purpose is to store javascript objects as documents in a nosql fashion and retrieve them with a similar mechanism. Runs in node (including cordova/phonegap and node-webkit), nativescript and the browser.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase