CDI vs Thymeleaf: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This markdown provides the key differences between CDI (Contexts and Dependency Injection) and Thymeleaf.

1. **Language**: CDI is a Java EE specification that focuses on managing dependencies and beans in a Java enterprise application. Thymeleaf, on the other hand, is a Java template engine used for web and non-web applications to process and render HTML, XML, JavaScript, and plain text. 
2. **Purpose**: CDI is primarily used for dependency injection and the management of beans in a Java application, providing a way to decouple components and easily manage dependencies. Thymeleaf, however, is used for creating dynamic server-side web applications, allowing developers to create templates with server-side processing capabilities.
3. **Integration**: CDI is usually integrated with other Java EE technologies like JPA, JSF, and JAX-RS to build enterprise applications. Thymeleaf can be used with various Java web frameworks such as Spring MVC, JEE, and Spark to create dynamic web applications.
4. **Rendering**: CDI does not handle rendering or processing of HTML views, as its main focus is on dependency injection. Thymeleaf, on the other hand, excels in processing and rendering HTML templates with server-side data, making it ideal for web development.
5. **Scope**: CDI provides scopes like @RequestScoped, @SessionScoped, and @ApplicationScoped to define the lifecycle of beans, ensuring that they are managed appropriately. Thymeleaf does not have scopes as it is mainly used for generating HTML content based on provided data.
6. **Syntax**: CDI uses annotations like @Inject, @Named, and @Qualified to manage dependencies and beans, while Thymeleaf uses its own syntax in HTML templates to interact with server-side data and render dynamic content.

In Summary, the key differences between CDI and Thymeleaf lie in their language focus, purpose, integration possibilities, rendering capabilities, scope management, and syntax usage in creating Java applications.