StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Templating Languages & Extensions
  4. CSS Pre Processors Extensions
  5. Compass vs node-sass

Compass vs node-sass

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Compass
Compass
Stacks352
Followers297
Votes12
GitHub Stars6.7K
Forks1.2K
node-sass
node-sass
Stacks87
Followers145
Votes0
GitHub Stars8.5K
Forks1.3K

Compass vs node-sass: What are the differences?

# Key Differences between Compass and node-sass

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Compilation Speed**: One major difference between Compass and node-sass is the compilation speed. Compass is known to be slower in compilation compared to node-sass, which is a more lightweight and faster alternative.
2. **Dependencies**: Compass requires Ruby to be installed on the system as it is written in Ruby, whereas node-sass is a Node.js binding that does not rely on Ruby, making it easier to integrate into Node.js projects.
3. **Syntax Support**: Compass provides a wide range of pre-defined mixins and functions that help in writing CSS faster and more efficiently, whereas node-sass offers a more basic set of features without the extensive pre-defined mixins of Compass.
4. **Maintenance**: Compass has not been actively maintained since 2016, while node-sass is regularly updated and supported by the Node.js community, ensuring compatibility with the latest technologies and standards.
5. **Community Support**: Node-sass has a larger and more active community compared to Compass, leading to better support, frequent updates, and a wider range of resources available for developers.
6. **Integration with Build Tools**: Node-sass integrates seamlessly with popular build tools like Gulp, Webpack, and Grunt, providing more flexibility and customization options compared to Compass. 

In Summary, Compass and node-sass differ in compilation speed, dependencies, syntax support, maintenance, community support, and integration with build tools, with node-sass being a more lightweight, actively maintained, and widely supported option for CSS preprocessing in Node.js projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Compass
Compass
node-sass
node-sass

The compass core framework is a design-agnostic framework that provides common code that would otherwise be duplicated across other frameworks and extensions.

It is a library that provides binding for Node.js to LibSass, the C version of the popular stylesheet preprocessor, Sass. It allows you to natively compile .scss files to css at incredible speed and automatically via a connect middleware.

-
Natively compile .scss files to css ; Binding for Node.js to LibSass
Statistics
GitHub Stars
6.7K
GitHub Stars
8.5K
GitHub Forks
1.2K
GitHub Forks
1.3K
Stacks
352
Stacks
87
Followers
297
Followers
145
Votes
12
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    No vendor prefix CSS pain
  • 1
    Variables
  • 1
    Mixins
  • 1
    Compass sprites
Cons
  • 1
    Needs Microsoft BuildTools and Python 2.7 to install
Integrations
Sass
Sass
Node.js
Node.js
Sass
Sass

What are some alternatives to Compass, node-sass?

Sass

Sass

Sass is an extension of CSS3, adding nested rules, variables, mixins, selector inheritance, and more. It's translated to well-formatted, standard CSS using the command line tool or a web-framework plugin.

Less

Less

Less is a CSS pre-processor, meaning that it extends the CSS language, adding features that allow variables, mixins, functions and many other techniques that allow you to make CSS that is more maintainable, themable and extendable.

Stylus

Stylus

Stylus is a revolutionary new language, providing an efficient, dynamic, and expressive way to generate CSS. Supporting both an indented syntax and regular CSS style.

PostCSS

PostCSS

PostCSS is a tool for transforming CSS with JS plugins. These plugins can support variables and mixins, transpile future CSS syntax, inline images, and more.

Bourbon

Bourbon

Bourbon is a library of pure sass mixins that are designed to be simple and easy to use. No configuration required. The mixins aim to be as vanilla as possible, meaning they should be as close to the original CSS syntax as possible.

CSS Modules

CSS Modules

It is a CSS file in which all class names and animation names are scoped locally by default. The key words here are scoped locally. With this, your CSS class names become similar to local variables in JavaScript. It goes into the compiler, and CSS comes out the other side.

astroturf

astroturf

It lets you write CSS in your JavaScript files without adding any runtime layer, and with your existing CSS processing pipeline.

PreCSS

PreCSS

It combines Sass-like syntactical sugar — like variables, conditionals, and iterators — with emerging CSS features — like logical and custom properties, media query ranges, and image sets.

Animate.css

Animate.css

It is a bunch of cool, fun, and cross-browser animations for you to use in your projects. Great for emphasis, home pages, sliders, and general just-add-water-awesomeness.

Autoprefixer

Autoprefixer

It is a CSS post processor. It combs through compiled CSS files to add or remove vendor prefixes like -webkit and -moz after checking the code.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase