Editor.js vs PDF.js

Overview

PDF.js

Stacks241

Followers86

Votes0

GitHub Stars52.2K

Forks10.5K

Editor.js

Stacks15

Followers17

Votes0

GitHub Stars31.1K

Forks2.2K

Editor.js vs PDF.js: What are the differences?

Key Difference 1: Ease of Use Editor.js is a user-friendly block-based editor that allows easy creation and modification of content, while PDF.js is a JavaScript library for rendering PDF documents. Editor.js simplifies the process of editing and formatting content, providing a more intuitive and streamlined experience compared to PDF.js.
Key Difference 2: Content Format Editor.js primarily focuses on handling various types of content such as text, images, quotes, and headings, whereas PDF.js focuses on rendering and displaying PDF documents. Editor.js allows users to create rich and interactive content, while PDF.js specializes in handling PDF files specifically.
Key Difference 3: Functionality Editor.js offers a wide range of features and editing capabilities, including text formatting, media embedding, link insertion, and collaboration options. In contrast, PDF.js is more focused on rendering and displaying PDFs, providing functionalities like zooming, page navigation, and searching within the document.
Key Difference 4: Output Format Editor.js generates HTML code as the output, which can be easily integrated into websites and further customized or styled using CSS. On the other hand, PDF.js produces PDF documents as the output, which is a fixed and non-editable format suitable for printing or distributing.
Key Difference 5: Real-time Editing Editor.js supports real-time collaboration, allowing multiple users to simultaneously edit and modify content, ensuring seamless teamwork and efficient content creation. PDF.js, being a document renderer, does not provide real-time editing capabilities.
Key Difference 6: Integration Editor.js offers extensive integration options with various frameworks, content management systems, and APIs, making it compatible with a wide range of platforms and applications. Conversely, PDF.js is primarily used as a standalone library for rendering PDFs and may require additional tools or frameworks for specific integration needs.

In Summary, Editor.js is a versatile block-based editor focused on easy content creation, collaboration, and integration, while PDF.js is a specialized JavaScript library for rendering and displaying PDF documents.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

PDF.js	Editor.js
It is a Portable Document Format (PDF) viewer that is built with HTML5. It is community-driven and supported by Mozilla Labs. The goal is to create a general-purpose, web standards-based platform for parsing and rendering PDFs.	It is a block-styled editor for rich media stories. It outputs clean data in JSON instead of heavy HTML-markup. And more important thing is that Editor.js is designed to be API extendable and pluggable.
General-purpose;Platform for parsing and rendering PDFs;Built with HTML5	Clean data output; API pluggable; Open source
Statistics
GitHub Stars 52.2K	GitHub Stars 31.1K
GitHub Forks 10.5K	GitHub Forks 2.2K
Stacks 241	Stacks 15
Followers 86	Followers 17
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
HTML5 JavaScript Firefox Google Chrome	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to PDF.js, Editor.js?

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Immutable.js

Immutable provides Persistent Immutable List, Stack, Map, OrderedMap, Set, OrderedSet and Record. They are highly efficient on modern JavaScript VMs by using structural sharing via hash maps tries and vector tries as popularized by Clojure and Scala, minimizing the need to copy or cache data.

Lodash

A JavaScript utility library delivering consistency, modularity, performance, & extras. It provides utility functions for common programming tasks using the functional programming paradigm.

Ramda

It emphasizes a purer functional style. Immutability and side-effect free functions are at the heart of its design philosophy. This can help you get the job done with simple, elegant code.

Vue CLI

Vue CLI aims to be the standard tooling baseline for the Vue ecosystem. It ensures the various build tools work smoothly together with sensible defaults so you can focus on writing your app instead of spending days wrangling with config.

Luxon

It is a library that makes it easier to work with dates and times in Javascript. If you want, add and subtract them, format and parse them, ask them hard questions, and so on, it provides a much easier and comprehensive interface than the native types it wraps.

Prepack

Prepack is a partial evaluator for JavaScript. Prepack rewrites a JavaScript bundle, resulting in JavaScript code that executes more efficiently. For initialization-heavy code, Prepack works best in an environment where JavaScript parsing is effectively cached.

Blockly

It is a client-side library for the programming language JavaScript for creating block-based visual programming languages and editors. It is a project of Google and is free and open-source software.

Related Comparisons

Editor.js vs PDF.js: What are the differences?

Key Difference 1: Ease of Use Editor.js is a user-friendly block-based editor that allows easy creation and modification of content, while PDF.js is a JavaScript library for rendering PDF documents. Editor.js simplifies the process of editing and formatting content, providing a more intuitive and streamlined experience compared to PDF.js.
Key Difference 2: Content Format Editor.js primarily focuses on handling various types of content such as text, images, quotes, and headings, whereas PDF.js focuses on rendering and displaying PDF documents. Editor.js allows users to create rich and interactive content, while PDF.js specializes in handling PDF files specifically.
Key Difference 3: Functionality Editor.js offers a wide range of features and editing capabilities, including text formatting, media embedding, link insertion, and collaboration options. In contrast, PDF.js is more focused on rendering and displaying PDFs, providing functionalities like zooming, page navigation, and searching within the document.
Key Difference 4: Output Format Editor.js generates HTML code as the output, which can be easily integrated into websites and further customized or styled using CSS. On the other hand, PDF.js produces PDF documents as the output, which is a fixed and non-editable format suitable for printing or distributing.
Key Difference 5: Real-time Editing Editor.js supports real-time collaboration, allowing multiple users to simultaneously edit and modify content, ensuring seamless teamwork and efficient content creation. PDF.js, being a document renderer, does not provide real-time editing capabilities.
Key Difference 6: Integration Editor.js offers extensive integration options with various frameworks, content management systems, and APIs, making it compatible with a wide range of platforms and applications. Conversely, PDF.js is primarily used as a standalone library for rendering PDFs and may require additional tools or frameworks for specific integration needs.

Editor.js vs PDF.js

Overview