Ethereum vs Tendermint

Overview

Ethereum

Stacks875

Followers463

Votes13

GitHub Stars13.6K

Forks5.9K

Tendermint

Stacks18

Followers39

Votes4

GitHub Stars5.8K

Forks2.1K

Ethereum vs Tendermint: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Ethereum and Tendermint are both blockchain platforms, but they have key differences that set them apart. Here, we will explore six key differences between Ethereum and Tendermint.

Consensus Algorithm: Ethereum uses a proof-of-work (PoW) consensus algorithm, specifically the Ethash algorithm. This means that miners have to solve complex puzzles to validate transactions and secure the network. On the other hand, Tendermint uses a Byzantine Fault Tolerant (BFT) consensus algorithm, namely the Tendermint Consensus. In this algorithm, a set of validators come to a consensus on the order and validity of transactions through a voting process.
Scalability: Ethereum has faced scalability challenges due to its PoW consensus algorithm. The limited throughput and high transaction fees have hindered its ability to handle a large number of transactions per second (TPS). In contrast, Tendermint's BFT consensus algorithm offers higher scalability as it can handle a significantly larger number of TPS. This makes Tendermint more suitable for applications requiring high throughput.
Smart Contract Language: Ethereum introduced its own smart contract language called Solidity. Solidity is Turing-complete, allowing developers to write complex and expressive smart contracts. On the other hand, Tendermint does not have its own smart contract language. Instead, it supports multiple languages such as Go and JavaScript for writing applications that run on top of the Tendermint blockchain.
Ecosystem and Adoption: Ethereum has a more mature and extensive ecosystem compared to Tendermint. This includes a wide range of decentralized applications (dApps), a vibrant developer community, and various tools and frameworks to build on top of the Ethereum platform. Tendermint, being a relatively newer platform, has a smaller ecosystem and fewer dApps built on it. However, Tendermint has gained some traction in the enterprise space with companies like Binance building their decentralized exchange (DEX) on the Tendermint-based Binance Chain.
Finality: Ethereum's PoW consensus algorithm does not provide immediate finality. Transactions on the Ethereum blockchain are considered final after a certain number of confirmations. This can take several minutes in some cases. In contrast, Tendermint's BFT consensus algorithm offers immediate finality. Once a block is committed by the validators, the transactions within that block are considered final and cannot be reversed.
Governance: Ethereum has a community-driven governance model, with decisions being made through a process of core developer consensus and proposals from the community. Changes and upgrades to the Ethereum network require broad consensus among its stakeholders. Tendermint, on the other hand, has a more structured governance model with a set of validators responsible for governing the network. Validators can propose and vote on changes to the Tendermint blockchain, allowing for faster decision-making.

In summary, Ethereum and Tendermint differ in their consensus algorithms, scalability, smart contract languages, ecosystem and adoption, finality, and governance models. While Ethereum is more widely adopted and has a larger ecosystem, Tendermint offers advantages in scalability, immediate finality, and a more structured governance model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Ethereum	Tendermint
A decentralized platform for applications that run exactly as programmed without any chance of fraud, censorship or third-party interference.	It is a software which can be used to achieve Byzantine fault tolerance (BFT) in any distributed computing platforms. It consists of two chief technical components: a blockchain consensus engine and a generic application interface.
Platform for decentralized applications; Global, and open-source	Byzantine Fault-Tolerant; State Machine Replication; Secure P2P; Lightning Fast; 100% Open Source
Statistics
GitHub Stars 13.6K	GitHub Stars 5.8K
GitHub Forks 5.9K	GitHub Forks 2.1K
Stacks 875	Stacks 18
Followers 463	Followers 39
Votes 13	Votes 4
Pros & Cons
Pros 7 Decentralized blockchain, most famous platform for DApp 2 #2 on capitalization after Bitcoin 2 Resistant to hash power attacks 2 Rich smart contract execution environment Cons 1 High fees and lacks scalability	Pros 2 BFT consensus 2 Has consensus engine separated from the application
Integrations
Golang C++ Python Rust	Python Golang C++ Rust Wagyu Blockchain

What are some alternatives to Ethereum, Tendermint?

Hyperledger Fabric

It is a collaborative effort created to advance blockchain technology by identifying and addressing important features and currently missing requirements. It leverages container technology to host smart contracts called “chaincode” that comprise the application logic of the system.

MultiChain

It is a platform that helps users to establish a certain private Blockchains that can be used by the organizations for financial transactions.

IPFS

It is a protocol and network designed to create a content-addressable, peer-to-peer method of storing and sharing hypermedia in a distributed file system.

Web3j

It is a lightweight, highly modular, reactive, type safe Java and Android library for working with Smart Contracts and integrating with clients (nodes) on the Ethereum network. This allows you to work with the Ethereum blockchain, without the additional overhead of having to write your own integration code for the platform.

Ripple

It is an open source protocol which is designed to allow fast and cheap transactions.

BigchainDB

It is designed to merge the best of two worlds: the “traditional” distributed database world and the “traditional” blockchain world. With high throughput, low latency, powerful query functionality, decentralized control, immutable data storage and built-in asset support.

Eris

It is free software that allows anyone to build their own secure, low-cost, run-anywhere applications using blockchain and smart contract technology.

Litecoin

It is a peer-to-peer Internet currency that enables instant, near-zero cost payments to anyone in the world. It is an open source, global payment network that is fully decentralized without any central authorities.

Exonum

It is a leading blockchain framework, designed to bring efficiency and security to your operations.

Decentralized Internet

A library and SDK built for building decentralized web and grid computing projects.

Related Comparisons

Ethereum vs Tendermint: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Ethereum and Tendermint are both blockchain platforms, but they have key differences that set them apart. Here, we will explore six key differences between Ethereum and Tendermint.

Consensus Algorithm: Ethereum uses a proof-of-work (PoW) consensus algorithm, specifically the Ethash algorithm. This means that miners have to solve complex puzzles to validate transactions and secure the network. On the other hand, Tendermint uses a Byzantine Fault Tolerant (BFT) consensus algorithm, namely the Tendermint Consensus. In this algorithm, a set of validators come to a consensus on the order and validity of transactions through a voting process.
Scalability: Ethereum has faced scalability challenges due to its PoW consensus algorithm. The limited throughput and high transaction fees have hindered its ability to handle a large number of transactions per second (TPS). In contrast, Tendermint's BFT consensus algorithm offers higher scalability as it can handle a significantly larger number of TPS. This makes Tendermint more suitable for applications requiring high throughput.
Smart Contract Language: Ethereum introduced its own smart contract language called Solidity. Solidity is Turing-complete, allowing developers to write complex and expressive smart contracts. On the other hand, Tendermint does not have its own smart contract language. Instead, it supports multiple languages such as Go and JavaScript for writing applications that run on top of the Tendermint blockchain.
Ecosystem and Adoption: Ethereum has a more mature and extensive ecosystem compared to Tendermint. This includes a wide range of decentralized applications (dApps), a vibrant developer community, and various tools and frameworks to build on top of the Ethereum platform. Tendermint, being a relatively newer platform, has a smaller ecosystem and fewer dApps built on it. However, Tendermint has gained some traction in the enterprise space with companies like Binance building their decentralized exchange (DEX) on the Tendermint-based Binance Chain.
Finality: Ethereum's PoW consensus algorithm does not provide immediate finality. Transactions on the Ethereum blockchain are considered final after a certain number of confirmations. This can take several minutes in some cases. In contrast, Tendermint's BFT consensus algorithm offers immediate finality. Once a block is committed by the validators, the transactions within that block are considered final and cannot be reversed.
Governance: Ethereum has a community-driven governance model, with decisions being made through a process of core developer consensus and proposals from the community. Changes and upgrades to the Ethereum network require broad consensus among its stakeholders. Tendermint, on the other hand, has a more structured governance model with a set of validators responsible for governing the network. Validators can propose and vote on changes to the Tendermint blockchain, allowing for faster decision-making.

Ethereum vs Tendermint

Overview