Exonum vs Tendermint

Overview

Exonum

Stacks6

Followers19

Votes0

Tendermint

Stacks18

Followers39

Votes4

GitHub Stars5.8K

Forks2.1K

Exonum vs Tendermint: What are the differences?

Consensus Mechanism: Exonum uses the Raft consensus algorithm, which is well-suited for achieving consensus in a closed group of nodes. On the other hand, Tendermint employs the Tendermint Core consensus engine, enabling it to support various consensus algorithms like PBFT and Proof-of-Stake, making it suitable for a decentralized network.
Governance Model: Exonum provides a centralized governance model where network participants need approval from authorities to join the network. In contrast, Tendermint follows a decentralized governance model, allowing anyone to participate in the network without permission.
Scalability: Exonum's architecture is modular, allowing for more flexible and easier scalability by adding or removing components as needed. Whereas Tendermint has a more rigid architecture, which can limit scalability options for specific use cases.
Ecosystem Support: Exonum has a smaller but dedicated community and ecosystem, primarily focused on enterprise solutions and government applications. While Tendermint has a larger and more diverse ecosystem, supported by multiple projects and applications built on top of the Tendermint Core.
Smart Contract Support: Exonum supports smart contracts written in Rust, providing a more secure and efficient programming language for blockchain application development. In contrast, Tendermint supports smart contracts written in languages like Solidity, enabling compatibility with the Ethereum ecosystem.
Finality: Exonum offers faster finality in its consensus mechanism, providing quicker confirmation for transactions. Meanwhile, Tendermint's finality depends on the chosen consensus algorithm, leading to potential differences in transaction finality speed.

In Summary, Exonum and Tendermint differ in their consensus mechanisms, governance models, scalability, ecosystem support, smart contract languages, and finality approaches.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Exonum	Tendermint
It is a leading blockchain framework, designed to bring efficiency and security to your operations.	It is a software which can be used to achieve Byzantine fault tolerance (BFT) in any distributed computing platforms. It consists of two chief technical components: a blockchain consensus engine and a generic application interface.
Distribution; Reliable Audit Trail; Cryptography; Exonum Design Goals; Permissioned Control; Transparency; Flexibility; Safety; Performance; Services, Endpoints, Persistence; Byzantine Consensus; Light Clients; Bitcoin Anchoring.	Byzantine Fault-Tolerant; State Machine Replication; Secure P2P; Lightning Fast; 100% Open Source
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 5.8K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 2.1K
Stacks 6	Stacks 18
Followers 19	Followers 39
Votes 0	Votes 4
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 2 BFT consensus 2 Has consensus engine separated from the application
Integrations
Python Golang C++ Rust Blockchain Wagyu	Python Golang C++ Rust Wagyu Blockchain

What are some alternatives to Exonum, Tendermint?

Ethereum

A decentralized platform for applications that run exactly as programmed without any chance of fraud, censorship or third-party interference.

Hyperledger Fabric

It is a collaborative effort created to advance blockchain technology by identifying and addressing important features and currently missing requirements. It leverages container technology to host smart contracts called “chaincode” that comprise the application logic of the system.

MultiChain

It is a platform that helps users to establish a certain private Blockchains that can be used by the organizations for financial transactions.

Best Crypto Payment Gateway & Processor for Businesses

Crypoverse is a cutting-edge crypto payment gateway integration platform designed to help online businesses, eCommerce stores, SaaS platforms, and digital enterprises seamlessly accept cryptocurrency payments.

IPFS

It is a protocol and network designed to create a content-addressable, peer-to-peer method of storing and sharing hypermedia in a distributed file system.

Web3j

It is a lightweight, highly modular, reactive, type safe Java and Android library for working with Smart Contracts and integrating with clients (nodes) on the Ethereum network. This allows you to work with the Ethereum blockchain, without the additional overhead of having to write your own integration code for the platform.

Ripple

It is an open source protocol which is designed to allow fast and cheap transactions.

BigchainDB

It is designed to merge the best of two worlds: the “traditional” distributed database world and the “traditional” blockchain world. With high throughput, low latency, powerful query functionality, decentralized control, immutable data storage and built-in asset support.

Eris

It is free software that allows anyone to build their own secure, low-cost, run-anywhere applications using blockchain and smart contract technology.

Litecoin

It is a peer-to-peer Internet currency that enables instant, near-zero cost payments to anyone in the world. It is an open source, global payment network that is fully decentralized without any central authorities.

Related Comparisons

Exonum vs Tendermint: What are the differences?

Consensus Mechanism: Exonum uses the Raft consensus algorithm, which is well-suited for achieving consensus in a closed group of nodes. On the other hand, Tendermint employs the Tendermint Core consensus engine, enabling it to support various consensus algorithms like PBFT and Proof-of-Stake, making it suitable for a decentralized network.
Governance Model: Exonum provides a centralized governance model where network participants need approval from authorities to join the network. In contrast, Tendermint follows a decentralized governance model, allowing anyone to participate in the network without permission.
Scalability: Exonum's architecture is modular, allowing for more flexible and easier scalability by adding or removing components as needed. Whereas Tendermint has a more rigid architecture, which can limit scalability options for specific use cases.
Ecosystem Support: Exonum has a smaller but dedicated community and ecosystem, primarily focused on enterprise solutions and government applications. While Tendermint has a larger and more diverse ecosystem, supported by multiple projects and applications built on top of the Tendermint Core.
Smart Contract Support: Exonum supports smart contracts written in Rust, providing a more secure and efficient programming language for blockchain application development. In contrast, Tendermint supports smart contracts written in languages like Solidity, enabling compatibility with the Ethereum ecosystem.
Finality: Exonum offers faster finality in its consensus mechanism, providing quicker confirmation for transactions. Meanwhile, Tendermint's finality depends on the chosen consensus algorithm, leading to potential differences in transaction finality speed.

In Summary, Exonum and Tendermint differ in their consensus mechanisms, governance models, scalability, ecosystem support, smart contract languages, and finality approaches.

Exonum vs Tendermint

Overview