Overview

Lodash

Stacks10.7K

Followers886

Votes3

GitHub Stars61.3K

Forks7.1K

Factor

Stacks13

Followers8

Votes1

Factor vs Lodash: What are the differences?

Introduction

In web development, developers often rely on libraries to simplify complex tasks. Two popular libraries are Factor and Lodash, which provide utility functions for manipulating and working with data.

Size: One key difference between Factor and Lodash is the size of the libraries. Factor is a lightweight library that focuses on providing essential utility functions, resulting in a smaller package size. On the other hand, Lodash is a more comprehensive library with a larger collection of functions, which leads to a larger package size.
Performance: Another significant difference is the performance of Factor compared to Lodash. Due to its smaller size and targeted functionality, Factor can be faster in certain operations compared to Lodash. Lodash, with its extensive feature set, may not be as performant in some scenarios where only a subset of functionalities is needed.
Compatibility: Factor is designed to be compatible with modern JavaScript practices and is frequently updated to align with the latest standards. Lodash, being a more mature library, may require additional polyfills or setup to work seamlessly with newer JavaScript features or environments.
Learning Curve: While both Factor and Lodash offer comprehensive documentation, the learning curve for Factor can be less steep due to its focused feature set. Developers new to utility libraries may find Factor easier to pick up and use, whereas Lodash's extensive API surface may require more time to master.
Modularity: Factor emphasizes modularity and encourages a more modular approach to using utility functions. This can result in a more tailored and optimized build for specific use cases. Lodash, on the other hand, provides a monolithic library with all functions included, which may not be as flexible for certain projects.
Community Support: Lodash boasts a larger community and ecosystem of plugins and extensions built around the library, providing additional functionalities and resources for developers. Factor, being a smaller library, may have a more limited community support system and fewer resources available for extending its capabilities.

In Summary, Factor and Lodash differ in terms of their size, performance, compatibility with modern JavaScript practices, learning curve, modularity, and community support, catering to different preferences and requirements in web development.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

VitePress Frameworks

VitePress

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

2

Advice on Lodash, Factor

Abigail

Dec 6, 2019

Decided

Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) provides standard data objects in JSON format for the healthcare industry. Since JSON objects are hierarchical and tree-like, we had a need to defensively 'pluck' fields from our JSON objects and do lots of mapping. We tried jQuery and Underscore and a few other technologies like FHIRPath; but Lodash has been the most well supported, works in the most contexts, has the cleanest syntax, etc. We particularly like the ES6 version of Lodash, where we can import the method names directly, without resorting to * or _ syntax. We got hooked on the 'get' function to defensively pluck fields from objects without crashing our user interface, and have found countless uses for the other lodash functions throughout our apps. Lodash is great for developing and optimizing algorithms.

38.3k views38.3k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Lodash	Factor
A JavaScript utility library delivering consistency, modularity, performance, & extras. It provides utility functions for common programming tasks using the functional programming paradigm.	It is an extension-focused and universal Vue.js platform for professional front-end developers. It will help you launch apps that impress and astonish your clients and colleagues. No more re-inventing the wheel, or rewriting and refactoring where it's unneeded.
-	Dashboard - Manage users, posts, whatever you can imagine. Use it for admin or application functionality; Themes - Use themes to get up in running in minutes instead of days or months; Plugins - Drop-in plugins just yarn add [plugin]; Open-source built on the MEVN Stack - Vue, Node, MongoDB
Statistics
GitHub Stars 61.3K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 7.1K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 10.7K	Stacks 13
Followers 886	Followers 8
Votes 3	Votes 1
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 Better than Underscore 1 Simple 0 Better that Underscore Cons 1 It reduce the performance	Pros 1 Themes
Integrations
JavaScript	Node.js ExpressJS Vue.js MongoDB

What are some alternatives to Lodash, Factor?

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Immutable.js

Immutable provides Persistent Immutable List, Stack, Map, OrderedMap, Set, OrderedSet and Record. They are highly efficient on modern JavaScript VMs by using structural sharing via hash maps tries and vector tries as popularized by Clojure and Scala, minimizing the need to copy or cache data.

Ramda

It emphasizes a purer functional style. Immutability and side-effect free functions are at the heart of its design philosophy. This can help you get the job done with simple, elegant code.

Vue CLI

Vue CLI aims to be the standard tooling baseline for the Vue ecosystem. It ensures the various build tools work smoothly together with sensible defaults so you can focus on writing your app instead of spending days wrangling with config.

Luxon

It is a library that makes it easier to work with dates and times in Javascript. If you want, add and subtract them, format and parse them, ask them hard questions, and so on, it provides a much easier and comprehensive interface than the native types it wraps.

Prepack

Prepack is a partial evaluator for JavaScript. Prepack rewrites a JavaScript bundle, resulting in JavaScript code that executes more efficiently. For initialization-heavy code, Prepack works best in an environment where JavaScript parsing is effectively cached.

Blockly

It is a client-side library for the programming language JavaScript for creating block-based visual programming languages and editors. It is a project of Google and is free and open-source software.

Cesium

it is used to create the leading web-based globe and map for visualizing dynamic data. We strive for the best possible performance, precision, visual quality, ease of use, platform support, and content.