StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Microsoft IIS vs gevent

Microsoft IIS vs gevent

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS
Stacks15.5K
Followers7.7K
Votes236
gevent
gevent
Stacks260
Followers52
Votes0

Microsoft IIS vs gevent: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Microsoft IIS and gevent

Introduction:

In the world of web development, there are various server options available. Two popular choices are Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) and gevent. While both of these server technologies serve the purpose of hosting websites and applications, there are some key differences that set them apart.

  1. Architecture and Language Support: Microsoft IIS is a web server specifically designed for Windows operating systems and predominantly supports applications built on .NET framework. On the other hand, gevent is written in Python and supports a wider range of programming languages including Python, Ruby, Perl, and others, making it a more flexible choice for developers.

  2. Concurrency and Scalability: One significant difference between IIS and gevent is their approach to concurrency and scalability. IIS utilizes a thread-based model where each client request is handled by a separate thread, which may lead to resource inefficiencies and limitations when dealing with a high number of concurrent connections. On the other hand, gevent uses an event-driven, cooperative multitasking model that is more efficient in terms of resource utilization and handling a large number of concurrent connections.

  3. Performance and Efficiency: In terms of performance, gevent excels due to its lightweight and non-blocking nature. It leverages greenlets, which are lightweight coroutines, allowing multiple tasks to be executed concurrently without the overhead of creating and managing thread resources. This can lead to improved response times and higher throughput compared to IIS, particularly when dealing with I/O-bound operations.

  4. Portability and Platform Compatibility: While IIS is limited to Windows operating systems, gevent is cross-platform and can be used on different operating systems such as Windows, Linux, and macOS. This portability makes gevent a more versatile choice for developers working on various platforms.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: IIS, being a Microsoft product, benefits from a large and established community as well as a comprehensive ecosystem of tools and libraries specifically designed for .NET development. In contrast, gevent has a smaller community but still offers an extensive range of third-party libraries and frameworks from the broader Python ecosystem.

  6. Configuration and Administration: IIS provides a graphical user interface (GUI) and a robust set of management tools that make it easier for administrators to configure and manage server settings. On the other hand, gevent is generally configured through code and requires more manual configuration, making it more suitable for developers who prefer fine-grained control over their server setup.

In Summary, Microsoft IIS and gevent have distinct differences in terms of architecture, language support, concurrency models, performance, portability, community, and administration. These differences can influence the choice between the two depending on specific requirements and preferences of developers and administrators.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Microsoft IIS, gevent

greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS
gevent
gevent

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

It is a coroutine -based Python networking library that uses greenlet to provide a high-level synchronous API on top of the libev or libuv event loop.

-
Fast event loop based on libev or libuv; Lightweight execution units based on greenlets; API that re-uses concepts from the Python standard library (for examples there are events and queues); Cooperative sockets with SSL support; Cooperative DNS queries performed through a threadpool, dnspython, or c-ares; Monkey patching utility to get 3rd party modules to become cooperative; TCP/UDP/HTTP servers; Subprocess support (through gevent.subprocess); Thread pools
Statistics
Stacks
15.5K
Stacks
260
Followers
7.7K
Followers
52
Votes
236
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 83
    Great with .net
  • 55
    I'm forced to use iis
  • 27
    Use nginx
  • 18
    Azure integration
  • 15
    Best for ms technologyes ms bullshit
Cons
  • 1
    Hard to set up
Cons
  • 1
    Not native
Integrations
No integrations available
Django
Django
Python
Python

What are some alternatives to Microsoft IIS, gevent?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase