StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Zope vs gevent

Zope vs gevent

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

gevent
gevent
Stacks260
Followers52
Votes0
Zope
Zope
Stacks175
Followers14
Votes1
GitHub Stars377
Forks106

Zope vs gevent: What are the differences?

  1. Architecture:

    • Zope is a web application server that follows the object-oriented architecture, making it suitable for building complex web applications. On the other hand, gevent is a coroutine-based Python networking library that provides a high-level concurrency framework for asynchronous programming.
  2. Concurrency Model:

    • Zope relies on threads for handling concurrent requests, which can sometimes lead to issues such as resource contention and sluggish performance under heavy loads. In contrast, gevent utilizes greenlets, which are lightweight coroutines that allow for high concurrency with minimal overhead.
  3. Performance:

    • Zope can be slower in handling a large number of concurrent connections due to its thread-based architecture, which may impact the overall performance of the application. Gevent, with its greenlet-based concurrency model, offers better performance and scalability by efficiently managing thousands of simultaneous connections.
  4. Community Support:

    • Zope has a dedicated but relatively smaller community compared to gevent, which has a larger user base and active community support. This difference in community size can influence the availability of resources, documentation, and troubleshooting assistance when using either technology.
  5. Dependencies:

    • Zope comes with a comprehensive set of built-in tools and components, which may result in a larger footprint and lead to potential dependency issues. In contrast, gevent has minimal dependencies and is known for its lightweight nature, making it a more attractive option for projects where resource efficiency is a priority.
  6. Use Cases:

    • Zope is well-suited for building content management systems, portals, and complex web applications that require extensive customization and flexibility. Gevent, on the other hand, is ideal for developing highly-scalable network servers, web applications with a large number of concurrent users, and real-time applications that benefit from asynchronous I/O operations.

In Summary, Zope and gevent differ in their architecture, concurrency model, performance, community support, dependencies, and use cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

gevent
gevent
Zope
Zope

It is a coroutine -based Python networking library that uses greenlet to provide a high-level synchronous API on top of the libev or libuv event loop.

It is a family of free and open-source web application servers written in Python, and their associated online community. It stands for "Z Object Publishing Environment", and was the first system using the now common object publishing methodology for the Web

Fast event loop based on libev or libuv; Lightweight execution units based on greenlets; API that re-uses concepts from the Python standard library (for examples there are events and queues); Cooperative sockets with SSL support; Cooperative DNS queries performed through a threadpool, dnspython, or c-ares; Monkey patching utility to get 3rd party modules to become cooperative; TCP/UDP/HTTP servers; Subprocess support (through gevent.subprocess); Thread pools
Easy to use; Specific; Reusable
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
377
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
106
Stacks
260
Stacks
175
Followers
52
Followers
14
Votes
0
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Cons
  • 1
    Not native
Pros
  • 1
    For using Plone CMS
Integrations
Django
Django
Python
Python
Python
Python
EasyEngine
EasyEngine
Plesk
Plesk
Scalyr
Scalyr
Datadog
Datadog
Tarantool
Tarantool
OpenResty
OpenResty

What are some alternatives to gevent, Zope?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase