StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. GlassFish vs Websphere

GlassFish vs Websphere

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GlassFish
GlassFish
Stacks581
Followers112
Votes0
Websphere
Websphere
Stacks99
Followers92
Votes0

GlassFish vs Websphere: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In the world of web application servers, GlassFish and WebSphere are two popular choices. Both offer a robust platform for deploying and managing Java applications. However, they differ in several key aspects that can influence the decision-making process for organizations looking for the best fit for their needs.

# 1. Performance:
**GlassFish**: Known for its lightweight nature and faster startup times, GlassFish is ideal for small to medium-sized applications that require quick deployment without sacrificing performance.
**WebSphere**: WebSphere is a heavyweight application server designed for large enterprise-level applications. While it may have a longer startup time, it excels in handling heavy workloads and scaling to meet the demands of a high-traffic environment.

# 2. Licensing and Cost:
**GlassFish**: GlassFish is open-source and free to use, making it an attractive option for businesses looking to minimize costs without sacrificing functionality.
**WebSphere**: WebSphere is a commercial product from IBM, which means it comes with licensing fees that can be prohibitively expensive for smaller organizations or startups.

# 3. Community Support:
**GlassFish**: GlassFish has a vibrant community of developers and users who actively contribute to its development and offer support through forums, blogs, and other online channels.
**WebSphere**: WebSphere, being a proprietary product, has a more limited community support network, with most assistance coming from IBM itself or paid support services.

# 4. Flexibility and Customization:
**GlassFish**: GlassFish is highly customizable and allows developers to tailor the server to their specific needs through a wide range of configuration options and extensions.
**WebSphere**: While WebSphere offers a high degree of flexibility, it may require more expertise to configure and customize due to its complex nature and enterprise-focused features.

# 5. Middleware Integration:
**GlassFish**: GlassFish provides out-of-the-box support for many popular middleware technologies, making it easier to integrate with other systems and services.
**WebSphere**: WebSphere excels in integrating with other IBM middleware products, offering seamless connectivity and compatibility within the IBM ecosystem.

# 6. Scalability:
**GlassFish**: GlassFish is well-suited for applications that require horizontal scaling, allowing them to distribute workloads across multiple instances for improved performance and reliability.
**WebSphere**: WebSphere shines in vertical scalability, making it a preferred choice for applications that need to handle a large number of simultaneous connections or extensive data processing within a single server instance.

In Summary, GlassFish and WebSphere offer distinct advantages and considerations in terms of performance, cost, support, customization, integration, and scalability, making it essential to carefully evaluate their differences to choose the right fit for your application requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

GlassFish
GlassFish
Websphere
Websphere

An Application Server means, It can manage Java EE applications You should use GlassFish for Java EE enterprise applications. The need for a seperate Web server is mostly needed in a production environment.

It is a highly scalable, secure and reliable Java EE runtime environment designed to host applications and microservices for any size organization. It supports the Java EE, Jakarta EE and MicroProfile standards-based programming models.

Statistics
Stacks
581
Stacks
99
Followers
112
Followers
92
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to GlassFish, Websphere?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase