Alternatives to go-zero

Go-zero is a microservice development framework that focuses on performance and high productivity. It provides features like RPC, gateway, cache, and database access, all integrated to help developers build scalable and efficient microservices. However, a limitation of go-zero is that it may have a steeper learning curve for beginners due to its extensive feature set.

1. Gin: Gin is a web framework written in Go that focuses on performance and functionality. Key features include fast routing, middleware support, and a minimalistic design. Pros of Gin compared to go-zero include its simplicity and popularity, while a con could be less built-in features.
2. Echo: Echo is a high-performance web framework for Go that features robust routing, middleware support, and template rendering. Pros of Echo compared to go-zero are its speed and ease of use, while a con could be a smaller community.
3. Fiber: Fiber is a web framework built on top of Fasthttp, known for its speed and low memory footprint. Key features include fast routing, middleware support, and JSON parsing. Pros of Fiber compared to go-zero are its performance and ease of use, while a con could be fewer built-in features.
4. Beego: Beego is a full-fledged web framework for Go that includes features like ORM, middleware support, and internationalization. Pros of Beego compared to go-zero are its feature completeness and active development, while a con could be a slightly steeper learning curve.
5. Revel: Revel is a high-productivity web framework for Go that includes features like hot code reloading, dependency injection, and ORM support. Pros of Revel compared to go-zero are its developer-friendly features and documentation, while a con could be slower performance.
6. Iris: Iris is a feature-rich web framework for Go that offers a wide range of plugins, middleware support, and robust routing. Pros of Iris compared to go-zero are its extensive features and performance, while a con could be its complex configuration.
7. Buffalo: Buffalo is a web development eco-system for Go that includes features like hot reloading, testing, and generators. Pros of Buffalo compared to go-zero are its rapid development tools and ease of use, while a con could be its convention over configuration approach.
8. Chi: Chi is a lightweight and flexible router for Go that offers middleware support, sub-routing, and zero allocations. Pros of Chi compared to go-zero are its simplicity and performance, while a con could be fewer built-in features.
9. Echox: Echox is an extension library for the Echo web framework in Go, providing additional features like logging, metrics, and tracing. Pros of Echox compared to go-zero are its modular design and extensibility, while a con could be potential compatibility issues with future versions of Echo.
10. Aero: Aero is a high-performance web framework for Go that leverages the power of Go's standard library to achieve fast routing and response times. Pros of Aero compared to go-zero are its speed and minimalistic design, while a con could be its limited feature set.