StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Gunicorn vs XAMPP

Gunicorn vs XAMPP

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Gunicorn
Gunicorn
Stacks1.3K
Followers908
Votes78
GitHub Stars10.3K
Forks1.8K
XAMPP
XAMPP
Stacks142
Followers272
Votes6

Gunicorn vs XAMPP: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. Deployment Environment: Gunicorn is a Python WSGI HTTP server while XAMPP is a cross-platform web server solution bundle.
  2. System Requirements: Gunicorn requires Python to be installed on the system for it to function properly, whereas XAMPP is independent of any specific programming language and can be used with various scripting languages like PHP, Perl, and others.
  3. Scope of Usage: Gunicorn is specifically designed for deploying Python web applications, making it a preferred choice for Python developers, while XAMPP is a more general-purpose web server that can be used for hosting websites developed in different languages.
  4. Configuration Options: Gunicorn usually requires minimal configuration to get started, focusing more on simplicity and ease of use, whereas XAMPP provides a wide range of configuration options and tools for customization and optimization of the web server environment.
  5. Operating System Compatibility: Gunicorn is compatible with Unix-based operating systems like Linux and macOS, making it ideal for developers working on these platforms, whereas XAMPP is designed to be cross-platform and can run on Windows, Linux, and macOS systems.
  6. Package Size and Installation: Gunicorn is a lightweight server that can be installed using Python package managers like pip, ensuring a quick and easy installation process, while XAMPP is a larger package that requires a separate installation process with multiple components like Apache, MySQL, PHP, and more.
In Summary, Gunicorn is a Python-specific, lightweight server for deploying web applications, whereas XAMPP is a cross-platform, comprehensive web server solution with broader language support and customization options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Gunicorn
Gunicorn
XAMPP
XAMPP

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

It consists mainly of the Apache HTTP Server, MariaDB database, and interpreters for scripts written in the PHP and Perl programming languages.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
10.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.3K
Stacks
142
Followers
908
Followers
272
Votes
78
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 34
    Python
  • 30
    Easy setup
  • 8
    Reliable
  • 3
    Fast
  • 3
    Light
Pros
  • 6
    Easy set up and installation of files

What are some alternatives to Gunicorn, XAMPP?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase