Alternatives to Imperva logo

Alternatives to Imperva

Akamai, CloudFlare, Incapsula, AWS WAF, and F5 are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Imperva.
12
21
+ 1
0

What is Imperva and what are its top alternatives?

Imperva is a cybersecurity company that provides solutions for protecting data and applications on-premises, in the cloud, and across hybrid environments. Its key features include web application firewalls, DDoS protection, database security, and API security. However, some limitations of Imperva include the complexity of deployment and management, as well as the cost of the solutions.

  1. Cloudflare: Cloudflare offers a range of services including DDoS protection, web application firewall, and CDN. Pros: Easy to configure, global network for faster performance. Cons: Limited customization options.
  2. Akamai: Akamai provides security solutions like web application firewall and DDoS protection. Pros: Scalable solutions, advanced threat intelligence. Cons: Expensive for small businesses.
  3. Barracuda Networks: Barracuda offers web application firewall, DDoS protection, and email security solutions. Pros: Easy to deploy, comprehensive security features. Cons: Limited advanced customization options.
  4. Fortinet: Fortinet provides a range of cybersecurity solutions including web application firewall and DDoS protection. Pros: Integrated security fabric, advanced threat protection. Cons: Complex setup for beginners.
  5. Sophos: Sophos offers web application firewall, DDoS protection, and endpoint security solutions. Pros: User-friendly interface, good endpoint protection. Cons: Limited customization options.
  6. F5 Networks: F5 Networks provides security solutions like web application firewall and DDoS protection. Pros: Advanced security features, extensive support options. Cons: High cost for some features.
  7. Radware: Radware offers DDoS protection, web application firewall, and bot management solutions. Pros: Comprehensive security features, real-time monitoring. Cons: Complex setup and configuration.
  8. Palo Alto Networks: Palo Alto Networks provides web application firewall and advanced threat protection solutions. Pros: Best-in-class threat intelligence, easy integration with other security tools. Cons: High cost for full feature set.
  9. Check Point Software: Check Point Software offers web application firewall, DDoS protection, and mobile security solutions. Pros: Robust security features, scalable solutions. Cons: Steep learning curve for administrators.
  10. Netskope: Netskope provides cloud security solutions including data loss prevention and threat protection. Pros: Comprehensive cloud security features, easy deployment. Cons: Limited on-premises security options.

Top Alternatives to Imperva

  • Akamai
    Akamai

    If you've ever shopped online, downloaded music, watched a web video or connected to work remotely, you've probably used Akamai's cloud platform. Akamai helps businesses connect the hyperconnected, empowering them to transform and reinvent their business online. We remove the complexities of technology, so you can focus on driving your business faster forward. ...

  • CloudFlare
    CloudFlare

    Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet. ...

  • Incapsula
    Incapsula

    Through an application-aware, global content delivery network (CDN), Incapsula provides any website and web application with best-of-breed security, DDoS protection, load balancing and failover solutions. ...

  • AWS WAF
    AWS WAF

    AWS WAF is a web application firewall that helps protect your web applications from common web exploits that could affect application availability, compromise security, or consume excessive resources. ...

  • F5
    F5

    It powers apps from development through their entire life cycle, so our customers can deliver differentiated, high-performing, and secure digital experiences. ...

  • IBM Guardium
    IBM Guardium

    It is a comprehensive data protection platform that enables security teams to automatically analyze what is happening in sensitive-data environments (databases, data warehouses, big data platforms, cloud environments, files systems, and so on) to help minimize risk and protect sensitive data. ...

  • Postman
    Postman

    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide. ...

  • Postman
    Postman

    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide. ...

Imperva alternatives & related posts

Akamai logo

Akamai

1.9K
0
The leading platform for cloud, mobile, media and security across any device, anywhere.
1.9K
0
PROS OF AKAMAI
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF AKAMAI
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Akamai posts

      CloudFlare logo

      CloudFlare

      76.6K
      1.8K
      The Web Performance & Security Company.
      76.6K
      1.8K
      PROS OF CLOUDFLARE
      • 424
        Easy setup, great cdn
      • 277
        Free ssl
      • 199
        Easy setup
      • 190
        Security
      • 180
        Ssl
      • 98
        Great cdn
      • 77
        Optimizer
      • 71
        Simple
      • 44
        Great UI
      • 28
        Great js cdn
      • 12
        Apps
      • 12
        HTTP/2 Support
      • 12
        DNS Analytics
      • 12
        AutoMinify
      • 9
        Rocket Loader
      • 9
        Ipv6
      • 9
        Easy
      • 8
        IPv6 "One Click"
      • 8
        Fantastic CDN service
      • 7
        DNSSEC
      • 7
        Nice DNS
      • 7
        SSHFP
      • 7
        Free GeoIP
      • 7
        Amazing performance
      • 7
        API
      • 7
        Cheapest SSL
      • 6
        SPDY
      • 6
        Free and reliable, Faster then anyone else
      • 5
        Ubuntu
      • 5
        Asynchronous resource loading
      • 4
        Global Load Balancing
      • 4
        Performance
      • 4
        Easy Use
      • 3
        CDN
      • 2
        Registrar
      • 2
        Support for SSHFP records
      • 1
        Web3
      • 1
        Прохси
      • 1
        HTTPS3/Quic
      CONS OF CLOUDFLARE
      • 2
        No support for SSHFP records
      • 2
        Expensive when you exceed their fair usage limits

      related CloudFlare posts

      Tom Klein

      Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

      See more
      Johnny Bell

      When I first built my portfolio I used GitHub for the source control and deployed directly to Netlify on a push to master. This was a perfect setup, I didn't need any knowledge about #DevOps or anything, it was all just done for me.

      One of the issues I had with Netlify was I wanted to gzip my JavaScript files, I had this setup in my #Webpack file, however Netlify didn't offer an easy way to set this.

      Over the weekend I decided I wanted to know more about how #DevOps worked so I decided to switch from Netlify to Amazon S3. Instead of creating any #Git Webhooks I decided to use Buddy for my pipeline and to run commands. Buddy is a fantastic tool, very easy to setup builds, copying the files to my Amazon S3 bucket, then running some #AWS console commands to set the content-encoding of the JavaScript files. - Buddy is also free if you only have a few pipelines, so I didn't need to pay anything 🤙🏻.

      When I made these changes I also wanted to monitor my code, and make sure I was keeping up with the best practices so I implemented Code Climate to look over my code and tell me where there code smells, issues, and other issues I've been super happy with it so far, on the free tier so its also free.

      I did plan on using Amazon CloudFront for my SSL and cacheing, however it was overly complex to setup and it costs money. So I decided to go with the free tier of CloudFlare and it is amazing, best choice I've made for caching / SSL in a long time.

      See more
      Incapsula logo

      Incapsula

      1.3K
      5
      Cloud-based service that makes websites safer, faster and more reliable.
      1.3K
      5
      PROS OF INCAPSULA
      • 5
        Best of them
      CONS OF INCAPSULA
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Incapsula posts

        AWS WAF logo

        AWS WAF

        167
        0
        Control which traffic to allow or block to your web application by defining customizable web security rules
        167
        0
        PROS OF AWS WAF
          Be the first to leave a pro
          CONS OF AWS WAF
            Be the first to leave a con

            related AWS WAF posts

            F5 logo

            F5

            41
            0
            Secure application delivery
            41
            0
            PROS OF F5
              Be the first to leave a pro
              CONS OF F5
                Be the first to leave a con

                related F5 posts

                IBM Guardium logo

                IBM Guardium

                8
                0
                Achieve smarter data protection with visibility, automation and scalability
                8
                0
                PROS OF IBM GUARDIUM
                  Be the first to leave a pro
                  CONS OF IBM GUARDIUM
                    Be the first to leave a con

                    related IBM Guardium posts

                    Postman logo

                    Postman

                    94.5K
                    1.8K
                    Only complete API development environment
                    94.5K
                    1.8K
                    PROS OF POSTMAN
                    • 490
                      Easy to use
                    • 369
                      Great tool
                    • 276
                      Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
                    • 156
                      Easy setup, looks good
                    • 144
                      The best api workflow out there
                    • 53
                      It's the best
                    • 53
                      History feature
                    • 44
                      Adds real value to my workflow
                    • 43
                      Great interface that magically predicts your needs
                    • 35
                      The best in class app
                    • 12
                      Can save and share script
                    • 10
                      Fully featured without looking cluttered
                    • 8
                      Collections
                    • 8
                      Option to run scrips
                    • 8
                      Global/Environment Variables
                    • 7
                      Shareable Collections
                    • 7
                      Dead simple and useful. Excellent
                    • 7
                      Dark theme easy on the eyes
                    • 6
                      Awesome customer support
                    • 6
                      Great integration with newman
                    • 5
                      Documentation
                    • 5
                      Simple
                    • 5
                      The test script is useful
                    • 4
                      Saves responses
                    • 4
                      This has simplified my testing significantly
                    • 4
                      Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
                    • 4
                      Easy as pie
                    • 3
                      API-network
                    • 3
                      I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
                    • 3
                      Mocking API calls with predefined response
                    • 2
                      Now supports GraphQL
                    • 2
                      Postman Runner CI Integration
                    • 2
                      Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
                    • 2
                      Continuous integration using newman
                    • 2
                      Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
                    • 2
                      Runner
                    • 2
                      Graph
                    • 1
                      <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
                    CONS OF POSTMAN
                    • 10
                      Stores credentials in HTTP
                    • 9
                      Bloated features and UI
                    • 8
                      Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
                    • 7
                      Poor GraphQL support
                    • 5
                      Expensive
                    • 3
                      Not free after 5 users
                    • 3
                      Can't prompt for per-request variables
                    • 1
                      Import swagger
                    • 1
                      Support websocket
                    • 1
                      Import curl

                    related Postman posts

                    Noah Zoschke
                    Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 3M views

                    We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

                    Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

                    Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

                    This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

                    Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

                    Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

                    Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

                    See more
                    Simon Reymann
                    Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5.1M views

                    Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

                    • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
                    • npm as package manager
                    • NestJS as Node.js framework
                    • TypeScript as programming language
                    • ExpressJS as web server
                    • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
                    • Postman as a tool for API development
                    • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
                    • JSON Web Token for access token management

                    The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

                    • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
                    • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
                    • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
                    • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
                    See more
                    Postman logo

                    Postman

                    94.5K
                    1.8K
                    Only complete API development environment
                    94.5K
                    1.8K
                    PROS OF POSTMAN
                    • 490
                      Easy to use
                    • 369
                      Great tool
                    • 276
                      Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
                    • 156
                      Easy setup, looks good
                    • 144
                      The best api workflow out there
                    • 53
                      It's the best
                    • 53
                      History feature
                    • 44
                      Adds real value to my workflow
                    • 43
                      Great interface that magically predicts your needs
                    • 35
                      The best in class app
                    • 12
                      Can save and share script
                    • 10
                      Fully featured without looking cluttered
                    • 8
                      Collections
                    • 8
                      Option to run scrips
                    • 8
                      Global/Environment Variables
                    • 7
                      Shareable Collections
                    • 7
                      Dead simple and useful. Excellent
                    • 7
                      Dark theme easy on the eyes
                    • 6
                      Awesome customer support
                    • 6
                      Great integration with newman
                    • 5
                      Documentation
                    • 5
                      Simple
                    • 5
                      The test script is useful
                    • 4
                      Saves responses
                    • 4
                      This has simplified my testing significantly
                    • 4
                      Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
                    • 4
                      Easy as pie
                    • 3
                      API-network
                    • 3
                      I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
                    • 3
                      Mocking API calls with predefined response
                    • 2
                      Now supports GraphQL
                    • 2
                      Postman Runner CI Integration
                    • 2
                      Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
                    • 2
                      Continuous integration using newman
                    • 2
                      Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
                    • 2
                      Runner
                    • 2
                      Graph
                    • 1
                      <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
                    CONS OF POSTMAN
                    • 10
                      Stores credentials in HTTP
                    • 9
                      Bloated features and UI
                    • 8
                      Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
                    • 7
                      Poor GraphQL support
                    • 5
                      Expensive
                    • 3
                      Not free after 5 users
                    • 3
                      Can't prompt for per-request variables
                    • 1
                      Import swagger
                    • 1
                      Support websocket
                    • 1
                      Import curl

                    related Postman posts

                    Noah Zoschke
                    Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 3M views

                    We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

                    Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

                    Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

                    This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

                    Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

                    Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

                    Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

                    See more
                    Simon Reymann
                    Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5.1M views

                    Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

                    • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
                    • npm as package manager
                    • NestJS as Node.js framework
                    • TypeScript as programming language
                    • ExpressJS as web server
                    • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
                    • Postman as a tool for API development
                    • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
                    • JSON Web Token for access token management

                    The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

                    • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
                    • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
                    • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
                    • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
                    See more