Janetsh vs picocli

Overview

picocli

Stacks10

Followers12

Votes8

GitHub Stars5.2K

Forks443

Janetsh

Stacks0

Followers7

Votes0

GitHub Stars384

Forks13

Janetsh vs picocli: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this comparison, we will outline the key differences between Janetsh and picocli, two popular command-line interface libraries for Java.

Namespace support: Janetsh provides built-in support for namespaces, allowing for better organization and separation of commands within the application. On the other hand, picocli does not natively support namespaces, which could lead to potential naming conflicts if not managed properly.
Completeness of features: picocli offers a wide range of features for creating complex command-line interfaces, including support for argument parsing, subcommands, and customization. In comparison, Janetsh focuses more on simplicity and ease of use, with fewer advanced features available out-of-the-box.
Community and support: picocli has a larger and more active community compared to Janetsh, resulting in more extensive documentation, tutorials, and support available online. This can be beneficial for developers looking for help or guidance while using the library.
Flexibility in output formatting: Janetsh provides more flexibility in customizing the output formatting of commands and results, allowing users to tailor the appearance of the command-line interface to their specific needs. On the other hand, picocli has more limited options for output customization.
Ease of integration with existing codebases: picocli is designed to seamlessly integrate with existing Java codebases, making it easier for developers to add command-line interfaces to their projects without significant restructuring. Janetsh, while still compatible with Java applications, may require more effort to integrate with certain code architectures.
Extensibility and plugin support: picocli offers robust support for creating custom extensions and plugins to enhance the functionality of the library, opening up possibilities for further customization. In contrast, Janetsh has fewer options for extending its core functionality through plugins or extensions.

In Summary, Janetsh and picocli differ in terms of namespace support, completeness of features, community and support, flexibility in output formatting, ease of integration with existing codebases, and extensibility and plugin support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

picocli	Janetsh
Library and framework for easily building professional command line applications on the JVM (Java, Groovy, Kotlin, Scala, etc). Usage help with ANSI colors. Autocomplete. Nested subcommands. Annotations and programmatic API. Easy to include as source to avoid adding dependencies. More than just a command line parser.	High-level scripting while also supporting the things we love about sh. Minimal knowledge of Janet is required for basic shell usage, but know that as you become more familiar with Janet
Java 5-13ea;annotation API;programmatic API;GraalVM integration - for extremely fast startup;nested subcommands to any depth;strongly typed option parameters;strongly typed positional parameters;many, many built-in types;easily add custom type converters;interactive password options;supports Maps for options and positional parameters (like -Dkey=value Java system properties);no boilerplate code, just implement Runnable or Callable;supports both mixins and subclassing for reuse;built-in support for standard --help and --version options (zero code);built-in help subcommand;uses STDERR for error messages, STDOUT for requested help by default;allows any option prefix;POSIX-style clustered short options;highly configurable parser;parser tracing to facilitate troubleshooting;quality documentation;built-in Groovy script support;easily integrates with Dependency Injection containers;easily integrates with JLine 2 and JLine 3 to create interactive shell applications	A powerful standard library; Functional and imperative programming; Powerful lisp macros; Runtime loadable extension modules written in C/C++/rust/zig; Coroutines and exceptions
Statistics
GitHub Stars 5.2K	GitHub Stars 384
GitHub Forks 443	GitHub Forks 13
Stacks 10	Stacks 0
Followers 12	Followers 7
Votes 8	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Best Java framework for Java CLI that I know 1 Easy to Use 1 Flexible 1 Actively maintained 1 Well documented	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Java Kotlin Scala Groovy	Windows Terminal Hyper Terminal Rust C++ C lang iTerm2

What are some alternatives to picocli, Janetsh?

Starship (Shell Prompt)

Starship is the minimal, blazing fast, and extremely customizable prompt for any shell! The prompt shows information you need while you're working, while staying sleek and out of the way.

TortoiseSVN

It is an Apache™ Subversion (SVN)® client, implemented as a Windows shell extension. It's intuitive and easy to use, since it doesn't require the Subversion command line client to run. And it is free to use, even in a commercial environment.

tmux

It enables a number of terminals to be created, accessed, and controlled from a single screen. tmux may be detached from a screen and continue running in the background, then later reattached.

Oh My ZSH

A delightful, open source, community-driven framework for managing your Zsh configuration. It comes bundled with thousands of helpful functions, helpers, plugins, themes.

Try

It lets you run a command and inspect its effects before changing your live system. It uses Linux's namespaces (via unshare) and the overlayfs union filesystem.

Bash-My-AWS

It is a simple but extremely powerful set of CLI commands for managing resources on Amazon Web Services. They harness the power of Amazon's AWSCLI, while abstracting away verbosity. The project implements some innovative patterns but (arguably) remains simple, beautiful and readable.

navi

It allows you to browse through cheatsheets (that you may write yourself or download from maintainers) and execute commands, prompting for argument values.

fzf

It is a general-purpose command-line fuzzy finder. It's an interactive Unix filter for command-line that can be used with any list; files, command history, processes, hostnames, bookmarks, git commits, etc.

Scoop.sh

It installs programs to your home directory by default. So you don’t need admin permissions to install programs, and you won’t see UAC popups every time you need to add or remove a program.

Dockerized

Run popular command-line tools within docker. It works on Linux, MacOS, and Windows (CMD, Powershell, Git Bash). You can quickly try out command line tools without the effort of downloading and installing them.

Related Comparisons

Janetsh vs picocli: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this comparison, we will outline the key differences between Janetsh and picocli, two popular command-line interface libraries for Java.

Namespace support: Janetsh provides built-in support for namespaces, allowing for better organization and separation of commands within the application. On the other hand, picocli does not natively support namespaces, which could lead to potential naming conflicts if not managed properly.
Completeness of features: picocli offers a wide range of features for creating complex command-line interfaces, including support for argument parsing, subcommands, and customization. In comparison, Janetsh focuses more on simplicity and ease of use, with fewer advanced features available out-of-the-box.
Community and support: picocli has a larger and more active community compared to Janetsh, resulting in more extensive documentation, tutorials, and support available online. This can be beneficial for developers looking for help or guidance while using the library.
Flexibility in output formatting: Janetsh provides more flexibility in customizing the output formatting of commands and results, allowing users to tailor the appearance of the command-line interface to their specific needs. On the other hand, picocli has more limited options for output customization.
Ease of integration with existing codebases: picocli is designed to seamlessly integrate with existing Java codebases, making it easier for developers to add command-line interfaces to their projects without significant restructuring. Janetsh, while still compatible with Java applications, may require more effort to integrate with certain code architectures.
Extensibility and plugin support: picocli offers robust support for creating custom extensions and plugins to enhance the functionality of the library, opening up possibilities for further customization. In contrast, Janetsh has fewer options for extending its core functionality through plugins or extensions.

Janetsh vs picocli

Overview