StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. JBoss vs Jetty

JBoss vs Jetty

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jetty
Jetty
Stacks510
Followers311
Votes47
JBoss
JBoss
Stacks457
Followers255
Votes0

JBoss vs Jetty: What are the differences?

JBoss and Jetty are both popular Java application servers used for running Java web applications. While they serve the same purpose, there are some key differences between the two.
  1. Architecture: JBoss is a full-featured Java application server that offers a complete set of services and features. It follows a multi-tiered architecture with components like web containers, EJB containers, and messaging services. On the other hand, Jetty is a lightweight web server and servlet container that focuses solely on serving HTTP requests and handling servlets. It does not provide all the additional services and features like JBoss.

  2. Scalability: JBoss is known for its scalability and high-performance capabilities. It can handle large workloads and distribute the workload across multiple servers using clustering techniques. Jetty, although capable of handling moderate workloads, may struggle with scaling to handle large traffic volumes and may require additional components or configurations for achieving scalability.

  3. Configuration: JBoss uses a configuration-based approach, often requiring XML files to define the server and application configurations. It offers various tools and APIs to manage and configure the server. On the other hand, Jetty uses a code-based approach, where the configuration is programmatically defined using Java code or annotations. This can provide more flexibility and control over the server configuration.

  4. Ease of Use: Jetty is often considered easier to use compared to JBoss. Its lightweight nature and simple setup make it suitable for development and testing environments. JBoss, being a full-featured application server, may have a steeper learning curve and require more in-depth knowledge of its various components and features.

  5. Community Support: JBoss has a large and active community with comprehensive documentation, forums, and user groups. It is widely adopted and supported by Red Hat, which provides commercial support and services. Jetty also has a supportive community, but it may not be as extensive as the JBoss community. However, Jetty benefits from being part of the Eclipse Foundation, which ensures long-term support and development.

  6. Industry Adoption: JBoss has been widely adopted in enterprise environments for running Java applications, particularly in large-scale deployments. It is well-suited for complex, mission-critical applications that require extensive features and robustness. On the other hand, Jetty is often chosen for lightweight web applications, embedded systems, and mobile applications where low resource usage and fast startup time are crucial.

In summary, JBoss is a comprehensive and scalable Java application server with extensive features and support, whereas Jetty is a lightweight web server and servlet container that offers simplicity and speed. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of the application and the scale at which it needs to operate.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Jetty
Jetty
JBoss
JBoss

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

An application platform for hosting your apps that provides an innovative modular, cloud-ready architecture, powerful management and automation, and world class developer productivity.

Full-featured and standards-based; Open source and commercially usable; Flexible and extensible; Small footprint; Embeddable; Asynchronous; Enterprise scalable; Dual licensed under Apache and Eclipse
-
Statistics
Stacks
510
Stacks
457
Followers
311
Followers
255
Votes
47
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 15
    Lightweight
  • 10
    Embeddable
  • 10
    Very fast
  • 6
    Scalable
  • 6
    Very thin
Cons
  • 0
    Student
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Jetty, JBoss?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase