StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. JBoss vs Websphere

JBoss vs Websphere

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JBoss
JBoss
Stacks457
Followers255
Votes0
Websphere
Websphere
Stacks99
Followers92
Votes0

JBoss vs Websphere: What are the differences?

Key Differences between JBoss and Websphere

JBoss and Websphere are two prominent application servers widely used in enterprise-level software development. While both servers offer similar functionality, there are significant differences that set them apart from each other.

  1. Cost: One of the major differences between JBoss and Websphere is the cost associated with their usage. JBoss, being an open-source application server, is available for free, making it a cost-effective option for developers and organizations. On the other hand, Websphere is a commercial product, which requires a license for its usage. This can considerably increase the overall cost of development and deployment.

  2. Ease of use and configuration: JBoss is known for its simplicity and ease of use. It provides a user-friendly interface, making it relatively simple to configure and manage. Websphere, on the other hand, can be more complex and require a higher level of expertise for its configuration and administration. It often involves a steeper learning curve, which may require additional training and resources.

  3. Performance and scalability: JBoss and Websphere also differ in terms of performance and scalability. JBoss is known for its lightweight and modular architecture, which allows it to deliver better performance and handle higher loads efficiently. Websphere, on the other hand, is designed to cater to larger and more complex enterprise environments, offering advanced scalability features. It can handle heavy workloads and provide high levels of scalability and reliability.

  4. Supported programming languages: Another notable difference between JBoss and Websphere is the range of programming languages they support. JBoss offers broader support for multiple programming languages, including Java, Python, Ruby, and others. Websphere, on the other hand, primarily focuses on Java-based applications, restricting support for other languages. This can impact the choice of language and development frameworks for a project.

  5. Community support and ecosystem: JBoss benefits from a strong open-source community and has a wide ecosystem of community-driven extensions, plugins, and libraries. This provides developers with a vast pool of resources and support. Websphere, being a commercial product, has a smaller community and a more limited ecosystem. It may rely more on official support channels, which can be a factor to consider based on an organization's requirements.

  6. Interoperability and standards compliance: JBoss is known for its flexibility and adherence to industry standards and specifications. It prioritizes interoperability with other systems and frameworks, making it easier to integrate with existing IT infrastructure. Websphere, being an enterprise solution, places a strong emphasis on adherence to Java and other industry standards. It provides extensive support for various enterprise technologies and integration frameworks.

In summary, the key differences between JBoss and Websphere lie in their cost, ease of use, performance, supported programming languages, community support, and standards compliance. These factors should be considered when selecting an application server based on the specific requirements of a project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

JBoss
JBoss
Websphere
Websphere

An application platform for hosting your apps that provides an innovative modular, cloud-ready architecture, powerful management and automation, and world class developer productivity.

It is a highly scalable, secure and reliable Java EE runtime environment designed to host applications and microservices for any size organization. It supports the Java EE, Jakarta EE and MicroProfile standards-based programming models.

Statistics
Stacks
457
Stacks
99
Followers
255
Followers
92
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to JBoss, Websphere?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase