JSF vs Lombok

Overview

JSF

Stacks138

Followers223

Votes4

Lombok

Stacks158

Followers85

Votes0

Lombok vs JSF: What are the differences?

Developers describe Lombok as "Get rid of boilerplate code, Spice up your java". It is a java library that automatically plugs into your editor and build tools, spicing up your java Never write another getter or equals method again, with one annotation your class has a fully featured builder, Automate your logging variables, and much more.. On the other hand, JSF is detailed as "It is used for building component-based web interfaces". It is used for building component-based user interfaces for web applications and was formalized as a standard through the Java Community.

Lombok and JSF belong to "Java Tools" category of the tech stack.

GameDuell, Universidade CEUMA, and Maps S.A. are some of the popular companies that use JSF, whereas Lombok is used by Whatfix, Swedbank Corporate Lending Baltic team, and Qasir Indonesia. JSF has a broader approval, being mentioned in 13 company stacks & 18 developers stacks; compared to Lombok, which is listed in 6 company stacks and 17 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

JSF	Lombok
It is used for building component-based user interfaces for web applications and was formalized as a standard through the Java Community	It is a java library that automatically plugs into your editor and build tools, spicing up your java. Never write another getter or equals method again, with one annotation your class has a fully featured builder, Automate your logging variables, and much more.
Statistics
Stacks 138	Stacks 158
Followers 223	Followers 85
Votes 4	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 Rich and comprehensive Request Life-cycle 1 Server Side component 1 Very Mature UI framework	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Java Java EE	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to JSF, Lombok?

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Mithril

Mithril is around 12kb gzipped thanks to its small, focused, API. It provides a templating engine with a virtual DOM diff implementation for performant rendering, utilities for high-level modelling via functional composition, as well as support for routing and componentization.

Quarkus

It tailors your application for GraalVM and HotSpot. Amazingly fast boot time, incredibly low RSS memory (not just heap size!) offering near instant scale up and high density memory utilization in container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes. We use a technique we call compile time boot.

Marionette

It is a JavaScript library with a RESTful JSON interface and is based on the Model–view–presenter application design paradigm. Backbone is known for being lightweight, as its only hard dependency is on one JavaScript library, Underscore.js, plus jQuery for use of the full library.

Ampersand.js

We <3 Backbone.js at &yet. It’s brilliantly simple and solves many common problems in developing clientside applications. But we missed the focused simplicity of tiny modules in node-land. We wanted something similar in style and philosophy, but that fully embraced tiny modules, npm, and browserify. Ampersand.js is a well-defined approach to combining (get it?) a series of intentionally tiny modules.