StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Kore vs lighttpd

Kore vs lighttpd

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

lighttpd
lighttpd
Stacks156
Followers133
Votes27
Kore
Kore
Stacks3
Followers11
Votes6
GitHub Stars3.8K
Forks319

Kore vs lighttpd: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code presents the key differences between Kore and lighttpd.

1. **Operating System Support**: Kore has wider supported platforms like FreeBSD, Linux, and macOS, whereas lighttpd is primarily focused on Linux-based systems, with limited support for other operating systems.
2. **Performance**: Kore is known for its high performance due to its event-driven architecture, while lighttpd also offers good performance but may not match the levels of Kore in certain scenarios.
3. **Extensions and Modules**: Kore has a modular design with support for various extensions, making it highly customizable, whereas lighttpd has a more limited set of modules and extensions available for customization.
4. **Configuration Complexity**: Kore is designed with a simpler and more straightforward configuration setup, making it easier for users to set up and manage, while lighttpd may require more configuration effort and expertise.
5. **Community and Support**: Kore has a smaller but dedicated community that provides support and updates, whereas lighttpd has a larger and more established community with extensive documentation and resources.
6. **Security Features**: Kore focuses on providing robust security features out of the box, making it a preferred choice for secure web applications, while lighttpd may require additional security configurations and plugins for enhanced protection.

In Summary, the key differences between Kore and lighttpd lie in their operating system support, performance, extensibility, configuration complexity, community support, and security features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

lighttpd
lighttpd
Kore
Kore

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Kore is an easy to use web application framework for writing scalable web APIs in C. Its main goals are security, scalability and allowing rapid development and deployment of such APIs. Because of this Kore is an ideal candidate for building robust, scalable and secure web things.

-
Supports SNI;Supports SPDY/3.1;Supports HTTP/1.1;Websocket support;Lightweight background tasks;Built-in parameter validation;Only HTTPS connections allowed;Multiple modules can be loaded at once;Built-in asynchronous PostgreSQL support;Default sane TLS ciphersuites (PFS in all major browsers);Load your web application as a precompiled dynamic library;Modules can be reloaded on-the-fly, even while serving content;Event driven (epoll/kqueue) architecture with per CPU core workers
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
3.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
319
Stacks
156
Stacks
3
Followers
133
Followers
11
Votes
27
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Lightweight
  • 6
    Easy setup
  • 2
    Proxy
  • 2
    Full featured
  • 2
    Virtal hosting
Pros
  • 2
    SPDY
  • 1
    Super-lightweight
  • 1
    Full featured
  • 1
    HTTPS
  • 1
    Super-fast

What are some alternatives to lighttpd, Kore?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase