StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Nodal.js vs lighttpd

Nodal.js vs lighttpd

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

lighttpd
lighttpd
Stacks156
Followers133
Votes27
Nodal.js
Nodal.js
Stacks11
Followers56
Votes0
GitHub Stars4.5K
Forks203

Nodal.js vs lighttpd: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Node.js and lighttpd. Both Node.js and lighttpd are web server technologies that are used to build and run web applications. However, they have some distinct differences that set them apart from each other.

  1. Architecture: Node.js is an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model server-side JavaScript runtime environment. It allows applications to handle concurrent requests efficiently, making it suitable for real-time applications. On the other hand, lighttpd uses a more traditional threaded or event-driven architecture, making it better suited for serving static files and handling low to medium traffic loads.

  2. Language Support: Node.js uses JavaScript as its primary programming language, which is well-known and widely used among developers. This makes it easier to find resources, libraries, and frameworks for building applications. Lighttpd, on the other hand, supports multiple programming languages, including C, C++, Perl, PHP, Python, and more, which provides more flexibility when choosing a language for web development.

  3. Performance: Node.js is known for its high performance and scalability, mainly due to its event-driven architecture and asynchronous I/O operations. It can handle a large number of concurrent connections with low memory consumption. On the other hand, lighttpd is also fast and efficient, but it may not perform as well as Node.js in highly concurrent scenarios.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: Node.js has a vibrant and active community with a vast ecosystem of packages and modules available through npm, the Node.js package manager. This extensive ecosystem provides developers with numerous tools and libraries to build applications quickly and efficiently. Lighttpd, although it has a lesser-known community, also has a decent set of extensions and plugins available for extending its functionality.

  5. Flexibility of Use: Node.js is a versatile technology that can be used to build various types of applications, including web servers, real-time applications, APIs, and more. It can also be used as a backend for mobile applications. Lighttpd, on the other hand, is mainly focused on serving static files and handling web server functions, making it more suitable for simple web applications or as a reverse proxy server.

  6. Ease of Setup and Configuration: Node.js is relatively easy to set up and configure, with a streamlined installation process and a simple API for building web servers. It also has a built-in package manager, npm, which makes it convenient to install and manage dependencies. Lighttpd, although it may have more configuration options, can be more challenging to set up and requires additional configuration files for customizing its behavior.

In Summary, Node.js and lighttpd differ in their architecture, language support, performance, community and ecosystem, flexibility of use, and ease of setup and configuration. Depending on the specific requirements and use cases, developers can choose the technology that best suits their needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

lighttpd
lighttpd
Nodal.js
Nodal.js

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Nodal is a web server for Node.js that was built with the sole purpose of making the developer's life easier.Boasting its own opinionated, explicit, idiomatic and highly-extensible full-service framework, Nodal takes care of all of the hard decisions for you and your team. This allows you to focus on creating an effective product in a short timespan while minimizing technical debt.

-
Models; Controllers; Templates: Routing; Query Composer; Migrations; Schedulers; Tasks; Initializers; Middleware; Authorizer; CLI tools
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
4.5K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
203
Stacks
156
Stacks
11
Followers
133
Followers
56
Votes
27
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Lightweight
  • 6
    Easy setup
  • 2
    Proxy
  • 2
    Virtal hosting
  • 2
    Simplicity
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to lighttpd, Nodal.js?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase