StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Javascript Utilities And Libraries
  5. Lodash vs Moment.js

Lodash vs Moment.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Lodash
Lodash
Stacks10.7K
Followers886
Votes3
GitHub Stars61.3K
Forks7.1K
Moment.js
Moment.js
Stacks7.4K
Followers297
Votes0
GitHub Stars48.1K
Forks7.0K

Lodash vs Moment.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

Lodash and Moment.js are two popular JavaScript libraries that offer various utility functions for web development. While they have some similarities, there are distinct differences between the two.

  1. API Design and Purpose: Lodash is primarily focused on providing utility functions for manipulating and working with arrays, objects, and collections in a more functional programming style. It offers a wide range of methods for manipulating data structures efficiently. On the other hand, Moment.js is designed specifically for handling dates and times in JavaScript. It provides a comprehensive set of functionalities for parsing, validating, manipulating, and formatting dates.

  2. Size and Modularity: Lodash is a larger library compared to Moment.js. Lodash has a modular design, allowing developers to import only the specific modules they need, reducing the overall file size. Moment.js, on the other hand, is a standalone library and comes with a larger bundle size, as it includes all functionalities related to date and time handling.

  3. Maintenance and Community: Lodash has a strong community support and is actively maintained with regular updates and bug fixes. It has been around for a long time and is widely used in many projects. Moment.js, on the other hand, has reached its end-of-life state and is no longer actively maintained. The moment team recommends using alternatives such as Luxon or Day.js for new projects.

  4. Time Zone Support: Moment.js has built-in support for working with time zones and allows developers to convert and manipulate dates in different time zones easily. Lodash, on the other hand, does not have built-in time zone support and is primarily focused on general-purpose data manipulation rather than time-related operations.

  5. Immutability and Chaining: Lodash provides a set of methods for performing immutable operations on arrays and objects. It allows developers to create new copies of the data while preserving the original data. Lodash also supports chaining, allowing multiple operations to be performed in a sequence. Moment.js, however, does not have built-in immutability or chaining support.

  6. Localization and Internationalization: Moment.js has excellent support for localization and internationalization. It offers various formatting options, allowing developers to display dates and times in different languages and formats. Lodash, on the other hand, does not have this level of built-in localization support.

In summary, Lodash is a versatile utility library for general-purpose data manipulation, while Moment.js is a specialized library specifically designed for handling date and time operations. Lodash offers modularity, immutability, and a large community, while Moment.js provides comprehensive time zone and localization support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Lodash, Moment.js

Abigail
Abigail

Dec 6, 2019

Decided

Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) provides standard data objects in JSON format for the healthcare industry. Since JSON objects are hierarchical and tree-like, we had a need to defensively 'pluck' fields from our JSON objects and do lots of mapping. We tried jQuery and Underscore and a few other technologies like FHIRPath; but Lodash has been the most well supported, works in the most contexts, has the cleanest syntax, etc. We particularly like the ES6 version of Lodash, where we can import the method names directly, without resorting to * or _ syntax. We got hooked on the 'get' function to defensively pluck fields from objects without crashing our user interface, and have found countless uses for the other lodash functions throughout our apps. Lodash is great for developing and optimizing algorithms.

38.3k views38.3k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Lodash
Lodash
Moment.js
Moment.js

A JavaScript utility library delivering consistency, modularity, performance, & extras. It provides utility functions for common programming tasks using the functional programming paradigm.

A javascript date library for parsing, validating, manipulating, and formatting dates.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
61.3K
GitHub Stars
48.1K
GitHub Forks
7.1K
GitHub Forks
7.0K
Stacks
10.7K
Stacks
7.4K
Followers
886
Followers
297
Votes
3
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Better than Underscore
  • 1
    Simple
  • 0
    Better that Underscore
Cons
  • 1
    It reduce the performance
No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Lodash, Moment.js?

Underscore

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Deno

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Chart.js

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Immutable.js

Immutable.js

Immutable provides Persistent Immutable List, Stack, Map, OrderedMap, Set, OrderedSet and Record. They are highly efficient on modern JavaScript VMs by using structural sharing via hash maps tries and vector tries as popularized by Clojure and Scala, minimizing the need to copy or cache data.

Ramda

Ramda

It emphasizes a purer functional style. Immutability and side-effect free functions are at the heart of its design philosophy. This can help you get the job done with simple, elegant code.

Vue CLI

Vue CLI

Vue CLI aims to be the standard tooling baseline for the Vue ecosystem. It ensures the various build tools work smoothly together with sensible defaults so you can focus on writing your app instead of spending days wrangling with config.

Luxon

Luxon

It is a library that makes it easier to work with dates and times in Javascript. If you want, add and subtract them, format and parse them, ask them hard questions, and so on, it provides a much easier and comprehensive interface than the native types it wraps.

Prepack

Prepack

Prepack is a partial evaluator for JavaScript. Prepack rewrites a JavaScript bundle, resulting in JavaScript code that executes more efficiently. For initialization-heavy code, Prepack works best in an environment where JavaScript parsing is effectively cached.

Blockly

Blockly

It is a client-side library for the programming language JavaScript for creating block-based visual programming languages and editors. It is a project of Google and is free and open-source software.

Cesium

Cesium

it is used to create the leading web-based globe and map for visualizing dynamic data. We strive for the best possible performance, precision, visual quality, ease of use, platform support, and content.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase