StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Microsoft IIS vs Websphere

Microsoft IIS vs Websphere

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS
Stacks15.5K
Followers7.7K
Votes236
Websphere
Websphere
Stacks99
Followers92
Votes0

Microsoft IIS vs Websphere: What are the differences?

Comparison between Microsoft IIS and Websphere

Introduction:

When it comes to web server software, two popular options are Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) and IBM Websphere. While both serve the purpose of hosting websites and applications, they have some key differences that make each suitable for specific use cases. In this comparison, we will highlight the main distinctions between Microsoft IIS and Websphere.

  1. Operating Systems Compatibility: Microsoft IIS is designed specifically for Windows operating systems, such as Windows Server and Windows 10, making it the preferred choice for organizations using Windows-based infrastructure. On the other hand, Websphere supports multiple operating systems, including Windows, Linux, and Unix, offering greater flexibility for businesses operating in heterogeneous environments.

  2. Vendor Support: IIS is a Microsoft product, and therefore benefits from extensive support and resources provided by Microsoft. This includes regular updates, patches, and a large developer community. Websphere, on the other hand, is developed by IBM and offers comprehensive support from IBM, including specialized services and consulting for complex enterprise deployments.

  3. Scalability and Performance: IIS is known for its high-performance capabilities and efficient resource utilization. It is optimized to handle heavy workloads and can efficiently serve static and dynamic content. Websphere, on the other hand, provides advanced scalability features, making it suitable for large-scale enterprise applications with high concurrency and complex architectures. It offers clustering and load balancing capabilities to distribute the workload across multiple servers.

  4. Integration Capabilities: IIS is tightly integrated with other Microsoft technologies, such as Active Directory and .NET framework. It seamlessly integrates with other Microsoft products, making it easier for organizations using Microsoft-based solutions to build and deploy web applications. Websphere, on the other hand, provides extensive integration capabilities and supports a wide range of programming languages, frameworks, and middleware components, making it suitable for heterogeneous environments.

  5. Management and Administration: IIS comes with a user-friendly graphical interface, making it easier to manage and configure web servers. It provides a familiar environment for Windows administrators and offers seamless integration with other Microsoft management tools. Websphere, on the other hand, offers a more granular level of control and configuration options, catering to the complex requirements of enterprise applications. It provides advanced monitoring and management capabilities, allowing administrators to fine-tune the server settings.

  6. Licensing and Cost: IIS is included as a part of Windows Server licenses, making it a cost-effective option for organizations already using Windows-based infrastructure. However, for organizations that require additional functionality or advanced features, there may be additional license costs involved. Websphere, on the other hand, comes with a separate licensing cost, which can be higher compared to IIS. The cost varies based on the deployment size and specific requirements of the organization.

In summary, Microsoft IIS is a preferred choice for organizations that predominantly use Windows-based infrastructure, with a focus on ease of use, performance, and integration with other Microsoft technologies. Websphere, on the other hand, caters to large-scale enterprise applications with complex requirements, offering advanced scalability, integration capabilities, and comprehensive support from IBM.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Microsoft IIS, Websphere

greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS
Websphere
Websphere

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

It is a highly scalable, secure and reliable Java EE runtime environment designed to host applications and microservices for any size organization. It supports the Java EE, Jakarta EE and MicroProfile standards-based programming models.

Statistics
Stacks
15.5K
Stacks
99
Followers
7.7K
Followers
92
Votes
236
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 83
    Great with .net
  • 55
    I'm forced to use iis
  • 27
    Use nginx
  • 18
    Azure integration
  • 15
    Best for ms technologyes ms bullshit
Cons
  • 1
    Hard to set up
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Microsoft IIS, Websphere?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase