StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Uvicorn vs nginx

Uvicorn vs nginx

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NGINX
NGINX
Stacks115.0K
Followers61.9K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars28.4K
Forks7.6K
Uvicorn
Uvicorn
Stacks169
Followers119
Votes0

Uvicorn vs nginx: What are the differences?

Introduction

This document compares the key differences between Uvicorn and nginx in terms of their functionalities and use cases.

  1. Handling of HTTP and WebSocket protocols: Uvicorn is an ASGI (Asynchronous Server Gateway Interface) server, which means it supports both HTTP and WebSocket protocols. It can handle bi-directional communication over WebSocket connections, making it suitable for real-time applications that require continuous data exchange between the server and clients. On the other hand, nginx is primarily designed as a high-performance HTTP server and reverse proxy. While it can handle WebSocket connections, it has limited support and is less optimized for real-time communication.

  2. Performance and scalability: Uvicorn is built on top of the high-performance ASGI framework, enabling it to handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently. It utilizes asynchronous programming to achieve high scalability and can process multiple requests concurrently without blocking, resulting in better overall performance. In contrast, nginx is known for its exceptional performance as an HTTP server and reverse proxy. It is specifically optimized for handling large volumes of HTTP traffic and can efficiently distribute requests across multiple backend servers, making it excellent for high-traffic websites and load balancing.

  3. Web server vs. reverse proxy: Uvicorn is primarily a web server, responsible for handling incoming client requests and serving responses. It can be used directly to deploy Python web applications and APIs. On the other hand, nginx functions as a reverse proxy and load balancer, sitting between client requests and backend servers. It is often used in combination with other web servers, including Uvicorn, to improve performance, handle SSL termination, caching, and routing.

  4. Configuration and customization: Uvicorn is highly customizable and allows developers to fine-tune various settings for their applications. It provides options to configure the number of worker processes, maximum connections, timeouts, and more. Nginx also offers extensive configuration options, allowing users to control various aspects of its behavior, such as caching, load balancing algorithms, SSL certificates, and request routing. Additionally, nginx has a modular architecture that enables the addition of various third-party modules to enhance its functionality.

  5. Operating system support: Uvicorn is a Python-based server and can run on any operating system that supports Python. It is well-suited for development scenarios and can be easily deployed on platforms like Linux, macOS, and Windows. Nginx, on the other hand, is a cross-platform solution and can run on a wide range of operating systems, including Linux, macOS, Windows, and BSD variants. It is widely used in production environments and offers robust support for various operating systems.

  6. Logging and monitoring: Uvicorn provides default logging capabilities, allowing developers to log information and debug their applications. It also integrates well with popular Python logging libraries for advanced logging needs. Nginx includes comprehensive logging features, enabling access logging, error logging, and the ability to customize log formats. Additionally, nginx offers various mechanisms for monitoring server performance and traffic, including built-in metrics and integration with third-party monitoring tools.

In summary, Uvicorn is an ASGI web server optimized for handling HTTP and WebSocket protocols, providing high performance, scalability, and configurability. Nginx, on the other hand, is a powerful HTTP server and reverse proxy that excels in handling high volumes of HTTP traffic, load balancing, and extensive configuration options. Both have their strengths and are often used together in deployment scenarios leveraging the strengths of each.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on NGINX, Uvicorn

greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments
jlp78
jlp78

May 31, 2019

ReviewonNGINXNGINX

I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.

727k views727k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

May 29, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."

725k views725k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

NGINX
NGINX
Uvicorn
Uvicorn

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

It is a lightning-fast ASGI server, built on uvloop and httptools. Until recently Python has lacked a minimal low-level server/application interface for asyncio frameworks. The ASGI specification fills this gap, and means we're now able to start building a common set of tooling usable across all asyncio frameworks.

-
ASGI server implementation; Supports HTTP/1.1 and WebSockets; Support for HTTP/2 is planned
Statistics
GitHub Stars
28.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
7.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
115.0K
Stacks
169
Followers
61.9K
Followers
119
Votes
5.5K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1453
    High-performance http server
  • 895
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
Cons
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Python
Python

What are some alternatives to NGINX, Uvicorn?

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase