StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Apache Tomcat vs Nodal.js

Apache Tomcat vs Nodal.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Stacks16.9K
Followers12.6K
Votes201
GitHub Stars8.0K
Forks5.3K
Nodal.js
Nodal.js
Stacks11
Followers56
Votes0
GitHub Stars4.5K
Forks203

Apache Tomcat vs Nodal.js: What are the differences?

Key differences between Apache Tomcat and Node.js

Apache Tomcat and Node.js are both popular technologies used in web development, but they have significant differences in their architecture and use cases.

  1. Execution Environment:

    • Apache Tomcat is a Java-based web server, which means it requires Java to run and is primarily used for Java web applications.
    • Node.js, on the other hand, is a JavaScript runtime built on Chrome's V8 engine, allowing it to execute JavaScript code outside the browser. It is often used for building scalable network applications and is not limited to a specific programming language.
  2. Concurrency Model:

    • Apache Tomcat follows a threaded model, where it assigns one thread per request, leading to potential resource inefficiencies when dealing with a large number of concurrent requests. It is best suited for traditional multi-threaded web applications.
    • Node.js uses a non-blocking, event-driven model, allowing it to handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently. It employs a single-threaded event loop, making it suitable for building highly scalable applications that require real-time communication.
  3. Development Paradigm:

    • Apache Tomcat follows a traditional, synchronous model of development, where requests are processed sequentially. This makes it easier to reason about the execution flow and ensures thread safety.
    • Node.js adopts an asynchronous, non-blocking approach, enabling developers to write code that executes concurrently without blocking the main thread. It is well-suited for building event-driven, non-blocking applications.
  4. Module Ecosystem:

    • Apache Tomcat has a vast ecosystem of Java libraries and frameworks that can be utilized for building web applications. It benefits from the extensive Java community and its mature ecosystem.
    • Node.js has a vibrant and rapidly growing ecosystem of JavaScript modules available through its package manager, npm. This rich module ecosystem enables developers to leverage existing modules for various functionalities, significantly accelerating development.
  5. Scalability:

    • Apache Tomcat can scale vertically by adding more resources to the server, such as CPU and memory. It may require additional servers to handle a higher number of concurrent connections effectively.
    • Node.js is inherently scalable due to its non-blocking I/O model and event-driven architecture. It can handle a significant number of concurrent connections on a single server, making it more efficient for scaling horizontally.
  6. Performance:

    • Apache Tomcat, being a mature technology, offers stable and reliable performance, especially for Java-based applications. It benefits from optimizations made in the Java ecosystem.
    • Node.js is known for its high performance due to its event-driven architecture and non-blocking I/O. It excels at handling small, I/O-intensive tasks, making it particularly well-suited for real-time applications and APIs.

In summary, Apache Tomcat is a Java-based web server primarily used for Java web applications, whereas Node.js is a JavaScript runtime built for scalable network applications using an event-driven, non-blocking model. Apache Tomcat relies on threads for concurrency, while Node.js uses a non-blocking event loop. Tomcat benefits from a mature Java ecosystem, while Node.js has a vibrant JavaScript module ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Apache Tomcat, Nodal.js

Hari
Hari

Mar 3, 2020

Needs advice

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to

  1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly.
  2. Install apache and tomcat.
  3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server.
  4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports.
  5. Create users on RHEL for application support team.
  6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

419k views419k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Nodal.js
Nodal.js

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Nodal is a web server for Node.js that was built with the sole purpose of making the developer's life easier.Boasting its own opinionated, explicit, idiomatic and highly-extensible full-service framework, Nodal takes care of all of the hard decisions for you and your team. This allows you to focus on creating an effective product in a short timespan while minimizing technical debt.

-
Models; Controllers; Templates: Routing; Query Composer; Migrations; Schedulers; Tasks; Initializers; Middleware; Authorizer; CLI tools
Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.0K
GitHub Stars
4.5K
GitHub Forks
5.3K
GitHub Forks
203
Stacks
16.9K
Stacks
11
Followers
12.6K
Followers
56
Votes
201
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 79
    Easy
  • 72
    Java
  • 49
    Popular
  • 1
    Spring web
Cons
  • 3
    Blocking - each http request block a thread
  • 2
    Easy to set up
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to Apache Tomcat, Nodal.js?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase