Alternatives to Owin logo

Alternatives to Owin

ASP.NET Core, Kestrel, OpenID Connect, NGINX, and Apache HTTP Server are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Owin.
204
20
+ 1
0

What is Owin and what are its top alternatives?

Owin, short for Open Web Interface for .NET, is a standardized interface between .NET web servers and web applications. It simplifies the communication between the server and web applications by providing a set of abstractions that decouple the server from the application. Owin allows for a modular approach to web application development and provides flexibility in choosing components to build web applications. However, Owin can be complex to set up and configure, especially for beginners.

  1. ASP.NET Core: ASP.NET Core is the next generation of ASP.NET that provides a modular framework for building web applications. It offers improved performance, cross-platform support, and a more modern development experience compared to Owin. Pros: Performance improvements, built-in dependency injection. Cons: Learning curve for developers transitioning from Owin.
  2. Nancy: Nancy is a lightweight, low-ceremony framework for building web applications in .NET. It offers a more intuitive and simple approach to web development compared to Owin. Pros: Easy to use, lightweight. Cons: Lack of certain advanced features compared to Owin.
  3. ServiceStack: ServiceStack is a high-performance, modular web framework for building web services and APIs in .NET. It provides a comprehensive toolkit for developing web applications with built-in support for features like caching, authentication, and serialization. Pros: Scalability, performance optimization. Cons: Steeper learning curve compared to Owin.
  4. Katana: Katana is a set of components for building Owin applications in .NET. It offers a more lightweight and flexible alternative to Owin, allowing developers to choose only the components they need for their applications. Pros: Flexibility, modularity. Cons: Limited community support compared to other alternatives.
  5. MVC 5: ASP.NET MVC 5 is a framework for building web applications using the Model-View-Controller architectural pattern. It provides a structured approach to web development compared to Owin. Pros: Built-in support for MVC pattern, robust architecture. Cons: Heavier and less flexible compared to Owin.
  6. Orleans: Orleans is a distributed systems framework for building scalable and reliable applications in .NET. It offers built-in support for actor-based programming models, making it easier to build highly concurrent applications compared to Owin. Pros: Scalability, fault tolerance. Cons: Complexity of building distributed systems.
  7. SignalR: SignalR is a real-time web library for building interactive web applications in .NET. It simplifies the process of adding real-time communication features to web applications compared to Owin. Pros: Real-time communication support, easy to use. Cons: Limited to real-time functionality.
  8. Web API: ASP.NET Web API is a framework for building HTTP services that can be consumed by a variety of clients including browsers, mobile devices, and desktop applications. It provides a more focused approach to building APIs compared to Owin. Pros: RESTful services support, easy integration. Cons: Lack of full web application support.
  9. FubuMVC: FubuMVC is a flexible web framework for building web applications in .NET. It offers a more customizable and extensible approach to web development compared to Owin. Pros: Extensibility, customization. Cons: Limited documentation and community support.
  10. OWIN-Katana-Hosting: OWIN-Katana-Hosting is a lightweight alternative to Owin for hosting Owin applications in .NET. It provides a simpler and more streamlined approach to Owin application hosting compared to traditional methods. Pros: Lightweight hosting, easy setup. Cons: Limited features compared to full Owin framework.

Top Alternatives to Owin

  • ASP.NET Core
    ASP.NET Core

    A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core. ...

  • Kestrel
    Kestrel

    Kestrel is based on Blaine Cook's "starling" simple, distributed message queue, with added features and bulletproofing, as well as the scalability offered by actors and the JVM. ...

  • OpenID Connect
    OpenID Connect

    It is a simple identity layer on top of the OAuth 2.0 protocol. It allows Clients to verify the identity of the End-User based on the authentication performed by an Authorization Server, as well as to obtain basic profile information about the End-User in an interoperable and REST-like manner. ...

  • NGINX
    NGINX

    nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018. ...

  • Apache HTTP Server
    Apache HTTP Server

    The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet. ...

  • Amazon EC2
    Amazon EC2

    It is a web service that provides resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers. ...

  • Firebase
    Firebase

    Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds. ...

  • Amazon Web Services (AWS)
    Amazon Web Services (AWS)

    It is a comprehensive and broadly adopted cloud platform, offering over 200 fully featured services from data centers globally. ...

Owin alternatives & related posts

ASP.NET Core logo

ASP.NET Core

4.2K
1.6K
A cross-platform .NET framework for building modern cloud-based web applications on Windows, Mac, or Linux
4.2K
1.6K
PROS OF ASP.NET CORE
  • 143
    C#
  • 118
    Performance
  • 96
    Open source
  • 90
    NuGet
  • 84
    Easy to learn and use
  • 81
    Productive
  • 77
    Visual Studio
  • 73
    Fast
  • 70
    Fast Performance With Microservices
  • 67
    Easily Expose API
  • 64
    Cross Platform
  • 61
    Scalable
  • 60
    Rapid Development
  • 55
    Web Apps
  • 46
    Visual Studio Code
  • 44
    Easy to learn
  • 39
    Azure Integration
  • 38
    MVC
  • 34
    Professionally Developed Packages
  • 32
    Great MVC and templating engine with Razor
  • 31
    Signalr
  • 31
    Razor Pages
  • 30
    Dependency Injection
  • 26
    JetBrains Rider
  • 25
    Easy to start
  • 24
    Tooling
  • 20
    MVVM
  • 20
    One stop shop
  • 16
    Fantastic and caring community
  • 11
    Add a pro
  • 10
    High Performance
  • 9
    Linux Support
  • 4
    Native AOT
  • 4
    Free
  • 3
    Integration test easy & reliable
  • 3
    WASI/WAGI
  • 3
    Easy tooling to deploy on container
CONS OF ASP.NET CORE
  • 5
    Great Doc
  • 3
    Fast
  • 2
    Professionally written Nuget Packages, vs IMPORT junk
  • 2
    Clean
  • 1
    Long polling is difficult to implement

related ASP.NET Core posts

We are going to develop a microservices-based application. It consists of AngularJS, ASP.NET Core, and MSSQL.

We have 3 types of microservices. Emailservice, Filemanagementservice, Filevalidationservice

I am a beginner in microservices. But I have read about RabbitMQ, but come to know that there are Redis and Kafka also in the market. So, I want to know which is best.

See more
Bogdan Pop

Hello, I am trying to learn a backend framework besides Node.js. I am not sure what to pick between ASP.NET Core (C#) and Spring Boot (Java). Any advice, any suggestion is highly appreciated. I am planning to build only Web APIs (no desktop applications or something like that). One thing to mention is that I have no experience in Java or C#. I am trying to learn one of those 2 and stick to it.

UPDATE: The project I am trying to build is a SaaS using microservices that supports multi tenancy.

See more
Kestrel logo

Kestrel

39
0
Simple, distributed message queue system
39
0
PROS OF KESTREL
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF KESTREL
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Kestrel posts

      OpenID Connect logo

      OpenID Connect

      154
      0
      An authorization framework
      154
      0
      PROS OF OPENID CONNECT
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF OPENID CONNECT
          Be the first to leave a con

          related OpenID Connect posts

          NGINX logo

          NGINX

          113.4K
          5.5K
          A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.
          113.4K
          5.5K
          PROS OF NGINX
          • 1.4K
            High-performance http server
          • 894
            Performance
          • 730
            Easy to configure
          • 607
            Open source
          • 530
            Load balancer
          • 289
            Free
          • 288
            Scalability
          • 226
            Web server
          • 175
            Simplicity
          • 136
            Easy setup
          • 30
            Content caching
          • 21
            Web Accelerator
          • 15
            Capability
          • 14
            Fast
          • 12
            High-latency
          • 12
            Predictability
          • 8
            Reverse Proxy
          • 7
            Supports http/2
          • 7
            The best of them
          • 5
            Great Community
          • 5
            Lots of Modules
          • 5
            Enterprise version
          • 4
            High perfomance proxy server
          • 3
            Embedded Lua scripting
          • 3
            Streaming media delivery
          • 3
            Streaming media
          • 3
            Reversy Proxy
          • 2
            Blash
          • 2
            GRPC-Web
          • 2
            Lightweight
          • 2
            Fast and easy to set up
          • 2
            Slim
          • 2
            saltstack
          • 1
            Virtual hosting
          • 1
            Narrow focus. Easy to configure. Fast
          • 1
            Along with Redis Cache its the Most superior
          • 1
            Ingress controller
          CONS OF NGINX
          • 10
            Advanced features require subscription

          related NGINX posts

          Simon Reymann
          Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 30 upvotes · 11.6M views

          Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

          • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
          • Respectively Git as revision control system
          • SourceTree as Git GUI
          • Visual Studio Code as IDE
          • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
          • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
          • SonarQube as quality gate
          • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
          • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
          • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
          • Heroku for deploying in test environments
          • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
          • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
          • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
          • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
          • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

          The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

          • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
          • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
          • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
          • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
          • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
          • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
          See more
          John-Daniel Trask
          Co-founder & CEO at Raygun · | 19 upvotes · 481.2K views

          We chose AWS because, at the time, it was really the only cloud provider to choose from.

          We tend to use their basic building blocks (EC2, ELB, Amazon S3, Amazon RDS) rather than vendor specific components like databases and queuing. We deliberately decided to do this to ensure we could provide multi-cloud support or potentially move to another cloud provider if the offering was better for our customers.

          We’ve utilized c3.large nodes for both the Node.js deployment and then for the .NET Core deployment. Both sit as backends behind an nginx instance and are managed using scaling groups in Amazon EC2 sitting behind a standard AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB).

          While we’re satisfied with AWS, we do review our decision each year and have looked at Azure and Google Cloud offerings.

          #CloudHosting #WebServers #CloudStorage #LoadBalancerReverseProxy

          See more
          Apache HTTP Server logo

          Apache HTTP Server

          64.5K
          1.4K
          Open-source HTTP server for modern operating systems including UNIX and Windows
          64.5K
          1.4K
          PROS OF APACHE HTTP SERVER
          • 479
            Web server
          • 305
            Most widely-used web server
          • 217
            Virtual hosting
          • 148
            Fast
          • 138
            Ssl support
          • 44
            Since 1996
          • 28
            Asynchronous
          • 5
            Robust
          • 4
            Proven over many years
          • 2
            Mature
          • 2
            Perfomance
          • 1
            Perfect Support
          • 0
            Many available modules
          • 0
            Many available modules
          CONS OF APACHE HTTP SERVER
          • 4
            Hard to set up

          related Apache HTTP Server posts

          Nick Rockwell
          SVP, Engineering at Fastly · | 46 upvotes · 4.1M views

          When I joined NYT there was already broad dissatisfaction with the LAMP (Linux Apache HTTP Server MySQL PHP) Stack and the front end framework, in particular. So, I wasn't passing judgment on it. I mean, LAMP's fine, you can do good work in LAMP. It's a little dated at this point, but it's not ... I didn't want to rip it out for its own sake, but everyone else was like, "We don't like this, it's really inflexible." And I remember from being outside the company when that was called MIT FIVE when it had launched. And been observing it from the outside, and I was like, you guys took so long to do that and you did it so carefully, and yet you're not happy with your decisions. Why is that? That was more the impetus. If we're going to do this again, how are we going to do it in a way that we're gonna get a better result?

          So we're moving quickly away from LAMP, I would say. So, right now, the new front end is React based and using Apollo. And we've been in a long, protracted, gradual rollout of the core experiences.

          React is now talking to GraphQL as a primary API. There's a Node.js back end, to the front end, which is mainly for server-side rendering, as well.

          Behind there, the main repository for the GraphQL server is a big table repository, that we call Bodega because it's a convenience store. And that reads off of a Kafka pipeline.

          See more
          Tim Abbott
          Shared insights
          on
          NGINXNGINXApache HTTP ServerApache HTTP Server
          at

          We've been happy with nginx as part of our stack. As an open source web application that folks install on-premise, the configuration system for the webserver is pretty important to us. I have a few complaints (e.g. the configuration syntax for conditionals is a pain), but overall we've found it pretty easy to build a configurable set of options (see link) for how to run Zulip on nginx, both directly and with a remote reverse proxy in front of it, with a minimum of code duplication.

          Certainly I've been a lot happier with it than I was working with Apache HTTP Server in past projects.

          See more
          Amazon EC2 logo

          Amazon EC2

          48.3K
          2.5K
          Scalable, pay-as-you-go compute capacity in the cloud
          48.3K
          2.5K
          PROS OF AMAZON EC2
          • 647
            Quick and reliable cloud servers
          • 515
            Scalability
          • 393
            Easy management
          • 277
            Low cost
          • 271
            Auto-scaling
          • 89
            Market leader
          • 80
            Backed by amazon
          • 79
            Reliable
          • 67
            Free tier
          • 58
            Easy management, scalability
          • 13
            Flexible
          • 10
            Easy to Start
          • 9
            Widely used
          • 9
            Web-scale
          • 9
            Elastic
          • 7
            Node.js API
          • 5
            Industry Standard
          • 4
            Lots of configuration options
          • 2
            GPU instances
          • 1
            Simpler to understand and learn
          • 1
            Extremely simple to use
          • 1
            Amazing for individuals
          • 1
            All the Open Source CLI tools you could want.
          CONS OF AMAZON EC2
          • 13
            Ui could use a lot of work
          • 6
            High learning curve when compared to PaaS
          • 3
            Extremely poor CPU performance

          related Amazon EC2 posts

          Ashish Singh
          Tech Lead, Big Data Platform at Pinterest · | 38 upvotes · 3.3M views

          To provide employees with the critical need of interactive querying, we’ve worked with Presto, an open-source distributed SQL query engine, over the years. Operating Presto at Pinterest’s scale has involved resolving quite a few challenges like, supporting deeply nested and huge thrift schemas, slow/ bad worker detection and remediation, auto-scaling cluster, graceful cluster shutdown and impersonation support for ldap authenticator.

          Our infrastructure is built on top of Amazon EC2 and we leverage Amazon S3 for storing our data. This separates compute and storage layers, and allows multiple compute clusters to share the S3 data.

          We have hundreds of petabytes of data and tens of thousands of Apache Hive tables. Our Presto clusters are comprised of a fleet of 450 r4.8xl EC2 instances. Presto clusters together have over 100 TBs of memory and 14K vcpu cores. Within Pinterest, we have close to more than 1,000 monthly active users (out of total 1,600+ Pinterest employees) using Presto, who run about 400K queries on these clusters per month.

          Each query submitted to Presto cluster is logged to a Kafka topic via Singer. Singer is a logging agent built at Pinterest and we talked about it in a previous post. Each query is logged when it is submitted and when it finishes. When a Presto cluster crashes, we will have query submitted events without corresponding query finished events. These events enable us to capture the effect of cluster crashes over time.

          Each Presto cluster at Pinterest has workers on a mix of dedicated AWS EC2 instances and Kubernetes pods. Kubernetes platform provides us with the capability to add and remove workers from a Presto cluster very quickly. The best-case latency on bringing up a new worker on Kubernetes is less than a minute. However, when the Kubernetes cluster itself is out of resources and needs to scale up, it can take up to ten minutes. Some other advantages of deploying on Kubernetes platform is that our Presto deployment becomes agnostic of cloud vendor, instance types, OS, etc.

          #BigData #AWS #DataScience #DataEngineering

          See more
          Simon Reymann
          Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 30 upvotes · 11.6M views

          Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

          • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
          • Respectively Git as revision control system
          • SourceTree as Git GUI
          • Visual Studio Code as IDE
          • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
          • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
          • SonarQube as quality gate
          • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
          • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
          • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
          • Heroku for deploying in test environments
          • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
          • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
          • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
          • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
          • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

          The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

          • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
          • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
          • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
          • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
          • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
          • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
          See more
          Firebase logo

          Firebase

          41K
          2K
          The Realtime App Platform
          41K
          2K
          PROS OF FIREBASE
          • 371
            Realtime backend made easy
          • 270
            Fast and responsive
          • 242
            Easy setup
          • 215
            Real-time
          • 191
            JSON
          • 134
            Free
          • 128
            Backed by google
          • 83
            Angular adaptor
          • 68
            Reliable
          • 36
            Great customer support
          • 32
            Great documentation
          • 25
            Real-time synchronization
          • 21
            Mobile friendly
          • 19
            Rapid prototyping
          • 14
            Great security
          • 12
            Automatic scaling
          • 11
            Freakingly awesome
          • 8
            Super fast development
          • 8
            Angularfire is an amazing addition!
          • 8
            Chat
          • 6
            Firebase hosting
          • 6
            Built in user auth/oauth
          • 6
            Awesome next-gen backend
          • 6
            Ios adaptor
          • 4
            Speed of light
          • 4
            Very easy to use
          • 3
            Great
          • 3
            It's made development super fast
          • 3
            Brilliant for startups
          • 2
            Free hosting
          • 2
            Cloud functions
          • 2
            JS Offline and Sync suport
          • 2
            Low battery consumption
          • 2
            .net
          • 2
            The concurrent updates create a great experience
          • 2
            Push notification
          • 2
            I can quickly create static web apps with no backend
          • 2
            Great all-round functionality
          • 2
            Free authentication solution
          • 1
            Easy Reactjs integration
          • 1
            Google's support
          • 1
            Free SSL
          • 1
            CDN & cache out of the box
          • 1
            Easy to use
          • 1
            Large
          • 1
            Faster workflow
          • 1
            Serverless
          • 1
            Good Free Limits
          • 1
            Simple and easy
          CONS OF FIREBASE
          • 31
            Can become expensive
          • 16
            No open source, you depend on external company
          • 15
            Scalability is not infinite
          • 9
            Not Flexible Enough
          • 7
            Cant filter queries
          • 3
            Very unstable server
          • 3
            No Relational Data
          • 2
            Too many errors
          • 2
            No offline sync

          related Firebase posts

          Stephen Gheysens
          Lead Solutions Engineer at Inscribe · | 14 upvotes · 1.8M views

          Hi Otensia! I'd definitely recommend using the skills you've already got and building with JavaScript is a smart way to go these days. Most platform services have JavaScript/Node SDKs or NPM packages, many serverless platforms support Node in case you need to write any backend logic, and JavaScript is incredibly popular - meaning it will be easy to hire for, should you ever need to.

          My advice would be "don't reinvent the wheel". If you already have a skill set that will work well to solve the problem at hand, and you don't need it for any other projects, don't spend the time jumping into a new language. If you're looking for an excuse to learn something new, it would be better to invest that time in learning a new platform/tool that compliments your knowledge of JavaScript. For this project, I might recommend using Netlify, Vercel, or Google Firebase to quickly and easily deploy your web app. If you need to add user authentication, there are great examples out there for Firebase Authentication, Auth0, or even Magic (a newcomer on the Auth scene, but very user friendly). All of these services work very well with a JavaScript-based application.

          See more
          Eugene Cheah

          For inboxkitten.com, an opensource disposable email service;

          We migrated our serverless workload from Cloud Functions for Firebase to CloudFlare workers, taking advantage of the lower cost and faster-performing edge computing of Cloudflare network. Made possible due to our extremely low CPU and RAM overhead of our serverless functions.

          If I were to summarize the limitation of Cloudflare (as oppose to firebase/gcp functions), it would be ...

          1. <5ms CPU time limit
          2. Incompatible with express.js
          3. one script limitation per domain

          Limitations our workload is able to conform with (YMMV)

          For hosting of static files, we migrated from Firebase to CommonsHost

          More details on the trade-off in between both serverless providers is in the article

          See more
          Amazon Web Services (AWS) logo

          Amazon Web Services (AWS)

          29.9K
          0
          A comprehensive and broadly adopted cloud platform
          29.9K
          0
          PROS OF AMAZON WEB SERVICES (AWS)
            Be the first to leave a pro
            CONS OF AMAZON WEB SERVICES (AWS)
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Amazon Web Services (AWS) posts

              waheed khan
              Associate Java Developer at txtsol · | 11 upvotes · 62.6K views

              I want to make application like Zomato, #Foodpanda.

              Which stack is best for this? As I have expertise in Java and Angular. What is the best stack you will recommend?

              Web Micro-service / Mono? Angular / React? Amazon Web Services (AWS) / Google Cloud Platform? DB : SQL or No SQL

              Mob Cross-platform: React Native / Flutter

              Note: We are a team of 5. what languages do you recommend if I go with microservices?

              Thanks

              See more
              Santiago Velasco
              Java Software Developer at ViewNext · | 8 upvotes · 23.9K views

              Hello everyone, I would like to start using a cloud service to host my projects, which are web applications. If anyone has enough experience with Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services (AWS) or Google Cloud Platform, I would like to know which of these is most recommended to use, depending on the features they have or how used they are. Thank you so much.

              See more