StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. In-Memory Databases
  4. In Memory Databases
  5. Aerospike vs SAP HANA

Aerospike vs SAP HANA

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Aerospike
Aerospike
Stacks200
Followers288
Votes48
GitHub Stars1.3K
Forks196
SAP HANA
SAP HANA
Stacks169
Followers148
Votes27

Aerospike vs SAP HANA: What are the differences?

# Key Differences Between Aerospike and SAP HANA

<Write introduction here>

1. **Data Model**:
   Aerospike is a NoSQL database while SAP HANA is a relational database management system (RDBMS). Aerospike uses a key-value data model, allowing flexible schema design, whereas SAP HANA uses a relational data model with tables, rows, and columns.

2. **Use Cases**:
   Aerospike is best suited for real-time applications requiring high speed data processing and low latency, such as ad tech, fraud detection, and recommendation engines. On the other hand, SAP HANA is commonly used in enterprise applications for business intelligence, data warehousing, and analytics.

3. **Consistency vs. Speed**:
   Aerospike prioritizes speed and low latency, providing excellent performance for read and write operations. In contrast, SAP HANA focuses on data consistency and provides strong transactional capabilities along with high-speed data processing.

4. **Scalability**:
   Aerospike is highly scalable horizontally, allowing organizations to add more nodes to distribute the data and workload efficiently. While SAP HANA also supports horizontal scaling, it requires additional configuration and resources compared to Aerospike.

5. **In-Memory Processing**:
   SAP HANA is known for its in-memory computing capabilities, allowing for real-time data processing directly in memory without the need to read from disk. Aerospike also offers in-memory storage options but is not as optimized for in-memory processing as SAP HANA.

6. **Licensing and Cost**:
   Aerospike is open-source with a commercial version available for enterprise features, offering flexible pricing options. In contrast, SAP HANA is a commercial product with licensing fees based on factors such as usage, storage capacity, and additional features needed.

In Summary, Aerospike is a NoSQL database designed for high-speed data processing with a key-value data model, ideal for real-time applications, while SAP HANA is a relational database management system optimized for enterprise applications with a focus on data consistency and in-memory computing capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Aerospike
Aerospike
SAP HANA
SAP HANA

Aerospike is an open-source, modern database built from the ground up to push the limits of flash storage, processors and networks. It was designed to operate with predictable low latency at high throughput with uncompromising reliability – both high availability and ACID guarantees.

It is an application that uses in-memory database technology that allows the processing of massive amounts of real-time data in a short time. The in-memory computing engine allows it to process data stored in RAM as opposed to reading it from a disk.

99% of reads/writes complete in under 1 millisecond.;Predictable low latency at high throughput – second to none. Read the YCSB Benchmark.;The secret sauce? A thousand things done right. Server code in ‘C’ (not Java or Erlang) precisely tuned to avoid context switching and memory copies. Highly parallelized multi-threaded, multi-core, multi-cpu, multi-SSD execution.;Indexes are always stored in RAM. Pure RAM mode is backed by spinning disks. In hybrid mode, individual tables are stored in either RAM or flash.
processes transactions and analytics at the same time; built-in advanced analytics and multi-model data processing engines
Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
196
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
200
Stacks
169
Followers
288
Followers
148
Votes
48
Votes
27
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 16
    Ram and/or ssd persistence
  • 12
    Easy clustering support
  • 5
    Easy setup
  • 4
    Acid
  • 3
    Performance better than Redis
Pros
  • 5
    SQL
  • 5
    In-memory
  • 4
    Distributed
  • 4
    Performance
  • 2
    Concurrent
Integrations
No integrations available
Python
Python
Power BI
Power BI
Tableau
Tableau

What are some alternatives to Aerospike, SAP HANA?

Redis

Redis

Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.

Hazelcast

Hazelcast

With its various distributed data structures, distributed caching capabilities, elastic nature, memcache support, integration with Spring and Hibernate and more importantly with so many happy users, Hazelcast is feature-rich, enterprise-ready and developer-friendly in-memory data grid solution.

MemSQL

MemSQL

MemSQL converges transactions and analytics for sub-second data processing and reporting. Real-time businesses can build robust applications on a simple and scalable infrastructure that complements and extends existing data pipelines.

Apache Ignite

Apache Ignite

It is a memory-centric distributed database, caching, and processing platform for transactional, analytical, and streaming workloads delivering in-memory speeds at petabyte scale

VoltDB

VoltDB

VoltDB is a fundamental redesign of the RDBMS that provides unparalleled performance and scalability on bare-metal, virtualized and cloud infrastructures. VoltDB is a modern in-memory architecture that supports both SQL + Java with data durability and fault tolerance.

Tarantool

Tarantool

It is designed to give you the flexibility, scalability, and performance that you want, as well as the reliability and manageability that you need in mission-critical applications

Azure Redis Cache

Azure Redis Cache

It perfectly complements Azure database services such as Cosmos DB. It provides a cost-effective solution to scale read and write throughput of your data tier. Store and share database query results, session states, static contents, and more using a common cache-aside pattern.

KeyDB

KeyDB

KeyDB is a fully open source database that aims to make use of all hardware resources. KeyDB makes it possible to breach boundaries often dictated by price and complexity.

LokiJS

LokiJS

LokiJS is a document oriented database written in javascript, published under MIT License. Its purpose is to store javascript objects as documents in a nosql fashion and retrieve them with a similar mechanism. Runs in node (including cordova/phonegap and node-webkit), nativescript and the browser.

BuntDB

BuntDB

BuntDB is a low-level, in-memory, key/value store in pure Go. It persists to disk, is ACID compliant, and uses locking for multiple readers and a single writer. It supports custom indexes and geospatial data. It's ideal for projects that need a dependable database and favor speed over data size.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase