StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Background Processing
  5. Aerospike vs Sidekiq

Aerospike vs Sidekiq

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Sidekiq
Sidekiq
Stacks1.2K
Followers633
Votes408
Aerospike
Aerospike
Stacks200
Followers288
Votes48
GitHub Stars1.3K
Forks196

Aerospike vs Sidekiq: What are the differences?

Developers describe Aerospike as "Flash-optimized in-memory open source NoSQL database". Aerospike is an open-source, modern database built from the ground up to push the limits of flash storage, processors and networks. It was designed to operate with predictable low latency at high throughput with uncompromising reliability – both high availability and ACID guarantees. On the other hand, Sidekiq is detailed as "Simple, efficient background processing for Ruby". Sidekiq uses threads to handle many jobs at the same time in the same process. It does not require Rails but will integrate tightly with Rails 3/4 to make background processing dead simple.

Aerospike belongs to "In-Memory Databases" category of the tech stack, while Sidekiq can be primarily classified under "Background Processing".

"Ram and/or ssd persistence " is the primary reason why developers consider Aerospike over the competitors, whereas "Simple" was stated as the key factor in picking Sidekiq.

Aerospike and Sidekiq are both open source tools. Sidekiq with 9.68K GitHub stars and 1.66K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Aerospike with 296 GitHub stars and 55 GitHub forks.

StackShare, Product Hunt, and HotelTonight are some of the popular companies that use Sidekiq, whereas Aerospike is used by JustWatch, Flyclops LLC, and StreetHawk. Sidekiq has a broader approval, being mentioned in 348 company stacks & 77 developers stacks; compared to Aerospike, which is listed in 30 company stacks and 9 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Sidekiq
Sidekiq
Aerospike
Aerospike

Sidekiq uses threads to handle many jobs at the same time in the same process. It does not require Rails but will integrate tightly with Rails 3/4 to make background processing dead simple.

Aerospike is an open-source, modern database built from the ground up to push the limits of flash storage, processors and networks. It was designed to operate with predictable low latency at high throughput with uncompromising reliability – both high availability and ACID guarantees.

-
99% of reads/writes complete in under 1 millisecond.;Predictable low latency at high throughput – second to none. Read the YCSB Benchmark.;The secret sauce? A thousand things done right. Server code in ‘C’ (not Java or Erlang) precisely tuned to avoid context switching and memory copies. Highly parallelized multi-threaded, multi-core, multi-cpu, multi-SSD execution.;Indexes are always stored in RAM. Pure RAM mode is backed by spinning disks. In hybrid mode, individual tables are stored in either RAM or flash.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
1.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
196
Stacks
1.2K
Stacks
200
Followers
633
Followers
288
Votes
408
Votes
48
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 124
    Simple
  • 99
    Efficient background processing
  • 60
    Scalability
  • 37
    Better then resque
  • 26
    Great documentation
Pros
  • 16
    Ram and/or ssd persistence
  • 12
    Easy clustering support
  • 5
    Easy setup
  • 4
    Acid
  • 3
    Scale

What are some alternatives to Sidekiq, Aerospike?

Redis

Redis

Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.

Beanstalkd

Beanstalkd

Beanstalks's interface is generic, but was originally designed for reducing the latency of page views in high-volume web applications by running time-consuming tasks asynchronously.

Hazelcast

Hazelcast

With its various distributed data structures, distributed caching capabilities, elastic nature, memcache support, integration with Spring and Hibernate and more importantly with so many happy users, Hazelcast is feature-rich, enterprise-ready and developer-friendly in-memory data grid solution.

MemSQL

MemSQL

MemSQL converges transactions and analytics for sub-second data processing and reporting. Real-time businesses can build robust applications on a simple and scalable infrastructure that complements and extends existing data pipelines.

Apache Ignite

Apache Ignite

It is a memory-centric distributed database, caching, and processing platform for transactional, analytical, and streaming workloads delivering in-memory speeds at petabyte scale

SAP HANA

SAP HANA

It is an application that uses in-memory database technology that allows the processing of massive amounts of real-time data in a short time. The in-memory computing engine allows it to process data stored in RAM as opposed to reading it from a disk.

VoltDB

VoltDB

VoltDB is a fundamental redesign of the RDBMS that provides unparalleled performance and scalability on bare-metal, virtualized and cloud infrastructures. VoltDB is a modern in-memory architecture that supports both SQL + Java with data durability and fault tolerance.

Hangfire

Hangfire

It is an open-source framework that helps you to create, process and manage your background jobs, i.e. operations you don't want to put in your request processing pipeline. It supports all kind of background tasks – short-running and long-running, CPU intensive and I/O intensive, one shot and recurrent.

Resque

Resque

Background jobs can be any Ruby class or module that responds to perform. Your existing classes can easily be converted to background jobs or you can create new classes specifically to do work. Or, you can do both.

Tarantool

Tarantool

It is designed to give you the flexibility, scalability, and performance that you want, as well as the reliability and manageability that you need in mission-critical applications

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase