Amazon DynamoDB vs Google Cloud Datastore vs Orchestrate

Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB

1.4K
816
+ 1
151
Google Cloud Datastore
Google Cloud Datastore

137
93
+ 1
8
Orchestrate
Orchestrate

5
11
+ 1
0
- No public GitHub repository available -
- No public GitHub repository available -
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Amazon DynamoDB?

All data items are stored on Solid State Drives (SSDs), and are replicated across 3 Availability Zones for high availability and durability. With DynamoDB, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available distributed database cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

What is Google Cloud Datastore?

Use a managed, NoSQL, schemaless database for storing non-relational data. Cloud Datastore automatically scales as you need it and supports transactions as well as robust, SQL-like queries.

What is Orchestrate?

Orchestrate is a managed database service that delivers a single access point to full-text search, time-ordered events, geospatial and graph queries through a REST API. It allows developers to build complete apps or add features to existing ones fast, without the operational burden of deploying and managing multiple databases themselves.

Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Amazon DynamoDB?
Why do developers choose Google Cloud Datastore?
Why do developers choose Orchestrate?
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

    What are the cons of using Amazon DynamoDB?
    What are the cons of using Google Cloud Datastore?
    What are the cons of using Orchestrate?
      Be the first to leave a con
        Be the first to leave a con
          Be the first to leave a con
          What companies use Amazon DynamoDB?
          What companies use Google Cloud Datastore?
          What companies use Orchestrate?

          Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

          What tools integrate with Amazon DynamoDB?
          What tools integrate with Google Cloud Datastore?
          What tools integrate with Orchestrate?
            No integrations found
              No integrations found

              Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

              What are some alternatives to Amazon DynamoDB, Google Cloud Datastore, and Orchestrate?
              MongoDB
              MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
              Amazon SimpleDB
              Developers simply store and query data items via web services requests and Amazon SimpleDB does the rest. Behind the scenes, Amazon SimpleDB creates and manages multiple geographically distributed replicas of your data automatically to enable high availability and data durability. Amazon SimpleDB provides a simple web services interface to create and store multiple data sets, query your data easily, and return the results. Your data is automatically indexed, making it easy to quickly find the information that you need. There is no need to pre-define a schema or change a schema if new data is added later. And scale-out is as simple as creating new domains, rather than building out new servers.
              Amazon S3
              Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web
              MySQL
              The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.
              Amazon Redshift
              Redshift makes it simple and cost-effective to efficiently analyze all your data using your existing business intelligence tools. It is optimized for datasets ranging from a few hundred gigabytes to a petabyte or more and costs less than $1,000 per terabyte per year, a tenth the cost of most traditional data warehousing solutions.
              See all alternatives
              Decisions about Amazon DynamoDB, Google Cloud Datastore, and Orchestrate
              No stack decisions found
              Interest over time
              Reviews of Amazon DynamoDB, Google Cloud Datastore, and Orchestrate
              No reviews found
              How developers use Amazon DynamoDB, Google Cloud Datastore, and Orchestrate
              Avatar of Karma
              Karma uses Amazon DynamoDBAmazon DynamoDB

              For most of the stuff we use MySQL. We just use Amazon RDS. But for some stuff we use Amazon DynamoDB. We love DynamoDB. It's amazing. We store usage data in there, for example. I think we have close to seven or eight hundred million records in there and it's scaled like you don't even notice it. You never notice any performance degradation whatsoever. It's insane, and the last time I checked we were paying $150 bucks for that.

              Avatar of Volkan Özçelik
              Volkan Özçelik uses Amazon DynamoDBAmazon DynamoDB

              zerotoherojs.com ’s userbase, and course details are stored in DynamoDB tables.

              The good thing about AWS DynamoDB is: For the amount of traffic that I have, it is free. It is highly-scalable, it is managed by Amazon, and it is pretty fast.

              It is, again, one less thing to worry about (when compared to managing your own MongoDB elsewhere).

              Avatar of CloudRepo
              CloudRepo uses Amazon DynamoDBAmazon DynamoDB

              We store customer metadata in DynamoDB. We decided to use Amazon DynamoDB because it was a fully managed, highly available solution. We didn't want to operate our own SQL server and we wanted to ensure that we built CloudRepo on high availability components so that we could pass that benefit back to our customers.

              Avatar of Matt Welke
              Matt Welke uses Google Cloud DatastoreGoogle Cloud Datastore

              When creating proofs of concept or small personal projects that are hosted primarily in GCP, with non-relational data models, this is the NoSQL managed database I usually pair them with.

              Avatar of Matt Welke
              Matt Welke uses Amazon DynamoDBAmazon DynamoDB

              When creating proofs of concept or small personal projects that are hosted primarily in AWS, with non-relational data models, this is the NoSQL managed database I usually pair them with.

              Avatar of CommentBox.io
              CommentBox.io uses Google Cloud DatastoreGoogle Cloud Datastore

              This is our primary database, though most of our actual data is stored in static storage. This database houses the metadata necessary for indexing and finding static data.

              Avatar of nrise
              nrise uses Amazon DynamoDBAmazon DynamoDB

              몇몇 로그는 현재 AWS DynamoDB 에 기록되고 있습니다. 개선을 통해 mongodb 로 옮길 계획을 하고 있습니다. 아주 간단한 데이터를 쌓는 용도로는 나쁘지 않습니다. 다만, 쿼리가 아주 제한적입니다. 사용하기 전에 반드시 DynamoDB 의 스펙을 확인할 필요가 있습니다.

              Avatar of papaver
              papaver uses Google Cloud DatastoreGoogle Cloud Datastore

              worked with a client that used datastore as their backend database. helped plan out their schema and architecture. loved the speed and simplicity.

              Avatar of Giftstarter
              Giftstarter uses Google Cloud DatastoreGoogle Cloud Datastore

              We store our data in this store.

              How much does Amazon DynamoDB cost?
              How much does Google Cloud Datastore cost?
              How much does Orchestrate cost?
              Pricing unavailable
              News about Google Cloud Datastore
              More news
              News about Orchestrate
              More news