Amazon DynamoDB vs Google Cloud Datastore vs Orchestrate

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Amazon DynamoDB

3.7K
3.2K
+ 1
195
Google Cloud Datastore

257
357
+ 1
12
Orchestrate

5
16
+ 1
0
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Amazon DynamoDB
Pros of Google Cloud Datastore
Pros of Orchestrate
  • 62
    Predictable performance and cost
  • 56
    Scalable
  • 35
    Native JSON Support
  • 21
    AWS Free Tier
  • 7
    Fast
  • 3
    No sql
  • 3
    To store data
  • 2
    Serverless
  • 2
    No Stored procedures is GOOD
  • 1
    ORM with DynamoDBMapper
  • 1
    Elastic Scalability using on-demand mode
  • 1
    Elastic Scalability using autoscaling
  • 1
    DynamoDB Stream
  • 7
    High scalability
  • 2
    Serverless
  • 2
    Ability to query any property
  • 1
    Pay for what you use
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Amazon DynamoDB
    Cons of Google Cloud Datastore
    Cons of Orchestrate
    • 4
      Only sequential access for paginate data
    • 1
      Scaling
    • 1
      Document Limit Size
      Be the first to leave a con
        Be the first to leave a con

        Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

        What is Amazon DynamoDB?

        With it , you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available distributed database cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

        What is Google Cloud Datastore?

        Use a managed, NoSQL, schemaless database for storing non-relational data. Cloud Datastore automatically scales as you need it and supports transactions as well as robust, SQL-like queries.

        What is Orchestrate?

        Orchestrate is a managed database service that delivers a single access point to full-text search, time-ordered events, geospatial and graph queries through a REST API. It allows developers to build complete apps or add features to existing ones fast, without the operational burden of deploying and managing multiple databases themselves.

        Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

        What companies use Amazon DynamoDB?
        What companies use Google Cloud Datastore?
        What companies use Orchestrate?

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with Amazon DynamoDB?
        What tools integrate with Google Cloud Datastore?
        What tools integrate with Orchestrate?
          No integrations found

          Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

          Blog Posts

          GitHubPythonNode.js+47
          55
          73196
          GitHubGitSlack+30
          27
          19085
          GitHubDockerAmazon EC2+23
          12
          6753
          GitHubPythonSlack+25
          7
          3329
          DockerSlackAmazon EC2+17
          18
          6132
          What are some alternatives to Amazon DynamoDB, Google Cloud Datastore, and Orchestrate?
          MongoDB
          MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
          Amazon SimpleDB
          Developers simply store and query data items via web services requests and Amazon SimpleDB does the rest. Behind the scenes, Amazon SimpleDB creates and manages multiple geographically distributed replicas of your data automatically to enable high availability and data durability. Amazon SimpleDB provides a simple web services interface to create and store multiple data sets, query your data easily, and return the results. Your data is automatically indexed, making it easy to quickly find the information that you need. There is no need to pre-define a schema or change a schema if new data is added later. And scale-out is as simple as creating new domains, rather than building out new servers.
          MySQL
          The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.
          Amazon S3
          Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web
          Amazon Redshift
          It is optimized for data sets ranging from a few hundred gigabytes to a petabyte or more and costs less than $1,000 per terabyte per year, a tenth the cost of most traditional data warehousing solutions.
          See all alternatives