Home
Application and Data
Application Hosting
Web Servers

Apache HTTP Server vs JBoss

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Apache HTTP Server
64.4K
22.5K
+ 1
1.4K
JBoss
336
253
+ 1
0
Add tool

Apache HTTP Server vs JBoss: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Apache HTTP Server and JBoss

Apache HTTP Server and JBoss are both popular web server software solutions, but they have several key differences that set them apart.

  1. Architecture and Purpose:

    • Apache HTTP Server is a simple and lightweight web server designed primarily to serve static content efficiently. It follows a modular architecture and can be extended using various modules for additional functionality.
    • JBoss, on the other hand, is a full-fledged application server that provides a comprehensive platform for developing, deploying, and hosting Java-based enterprise applications. It includes support for Java EE (Enterprise Edition) standards and offers features like clustering, caching, and load balancing.

  2. Supported Technologies:

    • Apache HTTP Server supports various standard web technologies like HTTP, SSL, and CGI. It can also integrate with PHP, Perl, and other scripting languages.
    • JBoss, being an application server, supports a wide range of technologies beyond just HTTP. It provides support for Java Servlets, JavaServer Pages (JSP), Enterprise JavaBeans (EJBs), Java Message Service (JMS), and other Java EE technologies.

  3. Deployment and Maintenance:

    • Apache HTTP Server is relatively easier to deploy and maintain as compared to JBoss. Since it is a lightweight server, it requires fewer resources and has a smaller footprint. It is commonly used in scenarios where simplicity and performance are paramount.
    • JBoss, being an application server, requires more effort and resources for deployment and maintenance. It has a larger footprint and offers more complex configuration options. It is suitable for enterprise-level applications that require extensive features and scalability.

  4. Clustering and High Availability:

    • Apache HTTP Server does not natively support clustering and high availability features. However, it can be combined with other technologies like load balancers to achieve similar functionality.
    • JBoss provides built-in support for clustering and high availability. It allows multiple instances of the application server to work together, providing failover and load balancing capabilities.

  5. Community and Support:

    • Apache HTTP Server has a large and active community of developers and users who contribute to its development and provide support. It has been around for a long time and has a vast amount of documentation and resources available.
    • JBoss, being part of the Red Hat family, has its own dedicated community and support infrastructure. It is backed by a professional and commercial entity, providing enterprise-level support and additional features.

  6. Licensing:

    • Apache HTTP Server is open-source software released under the Apache License 2.0. It allows users to modify and distribute the software freely.
    • JBoss, being a Red Hat product, is released under various licenses depending on the edition. The community edition (WildFly) is open-source and free, while the Red Hat Enterprise Edition requires a commercial license.

In summary, Apache HTTP Server is a lightweight web server focused on serving static content efficiently, while JBoss is a full-fledged application server designed for enterprise-level Java applications. Apache HTTP Server is easier to deploy and maintain, while JBoss offers more extensive features and support for various Java EE technologies. JBoss also provides built-in clustering and high availability capabilities, while Apache HTTP Server requires additional technologies for similar functionality.

Advice on Apache HTTP Server and JBoss
greg00m
| 6 upvotes · 721.7K views
Needs advice
on
Apache HTTP ServerApache HTTP ServerMicrosoft IISMicrosoft IIS
and
NGINXNGINX

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities. Ready, aim fire!

See more
Replies (1)
Simon Aronsson
Developer Advocate at k6 / Load Impact · | 4 upvotes · 716.4K views
Recommends
on
NGINXNGINX

I would pick nginx over both IIS and Apace HTTP Server any day. Combine it with docker, and as you grow maybe even traefik, and you'll have a really flexible solution for serving http content where you can take sites and projects up and down without effort, easily move it between systems and dont have to handle any dependencies on your actual local machine.

See more
StackShare Editors
| 2 upvotes · 683.5K views
Needs advice
on
Apache HTTP ServerApache HTTP Server
and
NGINXNGINX

From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."

See more
Replies (3)
jlp78
| 3 upvotes · 685.2K views
Recommends
on
NGINXNGINX

I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.

See more
Leandro Barral
CIO at IkeCode · | 2 upvotes · 683.2K views
Recommends
on
NGINXNGINX

I use nginx because its more flexible and easy to configure

See more
Christian Cwienk
Software Developer at SAP · | 1 upvotes · 682.5K views
Recommends
on
Apache HTTP ServerApache HTTP Server

I use Apache HTTP Server because it's intuitive, comprehensive, well-documented, and just works

See more
Decisions about Apache HTTP Server and JBoss
Hari Kishore
| 7 upvotes · 391.5K views
Shared insights
on
AnsibleAnsibleApache HTTP ServerApache HTTP ServerRed Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)Apache TomcatApache Tomcat

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to 1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly. 2. Install apache and tomcat. 3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server. 4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports. 5. Create users on RHEL for application support team. 6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Apache HTTP Server
Pros of JBoss
  • 479
    Web server
  • 305
    Most widely-used web server
  • 217
    Virtual hosting
  • 148
    Fast
  • 138
    Ssl support
  • 44
    Since 1996
  • 28
    Asynchronous
  • 5
    Robust
  • 4
    Proven over many years
  • 2
    Mature
  • 2
    Perfomance
  • 1
    Perfect Support
  • 0
    Many available modules
  • 0
    Many available modules
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Apache HTTP Server
    Cons of JBoss
    • 4
      Hard to set up
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is Apache HTTP Server?

      The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

      What is JBoss?

      An application platform for hosting your apps that provides an innovative modular, cloud-ready architecture, powerful management and automation, and world class developer productivity.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      Jobs that mention Apache HTTP Server and JBoss as a desired skillset
      Staff Software Engineer - Site Reliability
      Pinterest
      Toronto, ON, CA
      View Job Details
      SpeedDreamLinux+20
      What companies use Apache HTTP Server?
      What companies use JBoss?
      Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
      Learn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Apache HTTP Server?
      What tools integrate with JBoss?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      What are some alternatives to Apache HTTP Server and JBoss?
      Apache Tomcat
      Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.
      NGINX
      nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.
      Jetty
      Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.
      XAMPP
      It consists mainly of the Apache HTTP Server, MariaDB database, and interpreters for scripts written in the PHP and Perl programming languages.
      Amazon EC2
      It is a web service that provides resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.
      See all alternatives

      Related Comparisons

      Apache HTTP Server vs Apache Tomcat vs NGINXApache HTTP Server vs NGINXApache HTTP Server vs Gunicorn vs NGINXApache HTTP Server vs NGINX vs lighttpdApache HTTP Server vs Jetty vs NGINX

      Trending Comparisons

      Django vs Laravel vs Node.jsBootstrap vs Foundation vs Material-UINode.js vs Spring BootFlyway vs LiquibaseAWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

      Top Comparisons

      Postman vs Swagger UIHipChat vs Mattermost vs SlackBitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLabBootstrap vs Materialize