Apache HTTP Server vs Kore

Overview

Apache HTTP Server

Stacks64.5K

Followers22.8K

Votes1.4K

GitHub Stars3.8K

Forks1.2K

Kore

Stacks3

Followers11

Votes6

GitHub Stars3.8K

Forks319

Apache HTTP Server vs Kore: What are the differences?

Architecture: Apache HTTP Server follows a multi-process, multi-threaded architecture where each client request is handled by a separate process or thread. On the other hand, Kore uses an event-driven architecture with a single process handling multiple connections asynchronously, making it more efficient in terms of resource utilization.
Language Support: Apache HTTP Server is primarily designed for serving static content and running CGI scripts written in various programming languages. In contrast, Kore is specifically optimized for serving dynamic web applications written in the C programming language, making it more suitable for high-performance web applications requiring low latency.
Extensions and Modules: Apache HTTP Server has a vast ecosystem of third-party extensions and modules that can be used to enhance its functionality, such as mod_rewrite for URL rewriting. Kore, on the other hand, provides a minimalistic core that can be extended using C modules, allowing for greater control over the web server's behavior but requiring more manual effort for customization.
Configuration: Apache HTTP Server uses a configuration file (httpd.conf) that can be complex and prone to errors, especially for beginners. Kore simplifies the configuration process by using a single configuration file (kore.conf) with a clear syntax and intuitive structure, making it easier to set up and maintain the web server.
Performance: Apache HTTP Server is known for its stability and reliability but may suffer from performance issues when handling a large number of concurrent connections. Kore is designed for high-performance applications and is capable of handling a large number of connections efficiently, making it a preferred choice for applications requiring low latency and high throughput.
Community and Support: Apache HTTP Server has a large and active community with extensive documentation and support resources available online. Kore, being a relatively newer project, may have a smaller community and fewer support resources, making it less ideal for users who rely heavily on community-driven help and solutions.

In Summary, Apache HTTP Server and Kore differ in terms of architecture, language support, extensions, configuration, performance, and community support, making each suitable for specific use cases based on requirements and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Apache HTTP Server, Kore

Daniel

Co-Founder at Polpo Data Analytics & Software Development

May 25, 2021

Decided

For us, NGINX is a lite HTTP server easy to configure. On our research, we found a well-documented software we a lot of support from the community.

We have been using it alongside tools like certbot and it has been a total success.

We can easily configure our sites and have a folder for available vs enabled sites, and with the nginx -t command we can easily check everything is running fine.

289k views289k

Comments

Hari

Mar 3, 2020

Needs advice

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to

configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly.
Install apache and tomcat.
Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server.
Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports.
Create users on RHEL for application support team.
other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

419k views419k

Comments

greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache HTTP Server	Kore
The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.	Kore is an easy to use web application framework for writing scalable web APIs in C. Its main goals are security, scalability and allowing rapid development and deployment of such APIs. Because of this Kore is an ideal candidate for building robust, scalable and secure web things.
-	Supports SNI;Supports SPDY/3.1;Supports HTTP/1.1;Websocket support;Lightweight background tasks;Built-in parameter validation;Only HTTPS connections allowed;Multiple modules can be loaded at once;Built-in asynchronous PostgreSQL support;Default sane TLS ciphersuites (PFS in all major browsers);Load your web application as a precompiled dynamic library;Modules can be reloaded on-the-fly, even while serving content;Event driven (epoll/kqueue) architecture with per CPU core workers
Statistics
GitHub Stars 3.8K	GitHub Stars 3.8K
GitHub Forks 1.2K	GitHub Forks 319
Stacks 64.5K	Stacks 3
Followers 22.8K	Followers 11
Votes 1.4K	Votes 6
Pros & Cons
Pros 479 Web server 305 Most widely-used web server 217 Virtual hosting 148 Fast 138 Ssl support Cons 4 Hard to set up	Pros 2 SPDY 1 Full featured 1 Super-lightweight 1 HTTPS 1 Super-fast

What are some alternatives to Apache HTTP Server, Kore?

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Apache HTTP Server vs Kore: What are the differences?

Architecture: Apache HTTP Server follows a multi-process, multi-threaded architecture where each client request is handled by a separate process or thread. On the other hand, Kore uses an event-driven architecture with a single process handling multiple connections asynchronously, making it more efficient in terms of resource utilization.
Language Support: Apache HTTP Server is primarily designed for serving static content and running CGI scripts written in various programming languages. In contrast, Kore is specifically optimized for serving dynamic web applications written in the C programming language, making it more suitable for high-performance web applications requiring low latency.
Extensions and Modules: Apache HTTP Server has a vast ecosystem of third-party extensions and modules that can be used to enhance its functionality, such as mod_rewrite for URL rewriting. Kore, on the other hand, provides a minimalistic core that can be extended using C modules, allowing for greater control over the web server's behavior but requiring more manual effort for customization.
Configuration: Apache HTTP Server uses a configuration file (httpd.conf) that can be complex and prone to errors, especially for beginners. Kore simplifies the configuration process by using a single configuration file (kore.conf) with a clear syntax and intuitive structure, making it easier to set up and maintain the web server.
Performance: Apache HTTP Server is known for its stability and reliability but may suffer from performance issues when handling a large number of concurrent connections. Kore is designed for high-performance applications and is capable of handling a large number of connections efficiently, making it a preferred choice for applications requiring low latency and high throughput.
Community and Support: Apache HTTP Server has a large and active community with extensive documentation and support resources available online. Kore, being a relatively newer project, may have a smaller community and fewer support resources, making it less ideal for users who rely heavily on community-driven help and solutions.

Apache HTTP Server vs Kore

Overview