StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Service Discovery
  5. Archaius vs Zookeeper

Archaius vs Zookeeper

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Zookeeper
Zookeeper
Stacks889
Followers1.0K
Votes43
Archaius
Archaius
Stacks2
Followers3
Votes0

Archaius vs Zookeeper: What are the differences?

1. **Scalability**: Archaius is primarily used for configuration management within applications, providing features like dynamic property management, whereas Zookeeper is a distributed coordination service designed for managing distributed systems and ensuring synchronization among nodes in a cluster. 2. **Data Consistency**: Archaius does not provide data consistency guarantees, as it is more focused on configuration management, while Zookeeper is designed to provide strong consistency and reliable data storage for distributed systems through its distributed coordination capabilities. 3. **Fault Tolerance**: Archaius does not have built-in fault tolerance mechanisms, whereas Zookeeper is designed with fault tolerance in mind, utilizing replication across multiple nodes to ensure reliable data storage and coordination in the presence of failures. 4. **Concurrency Control**: Archaius does not offer built-in concurrency control features, whereas Zookeeper provides mechanisms for handling concurrent access to shared resources, ensuring data integrity and coherence in distributed systems. 5. **Use Cases**: Archaius is commonly used in applications for dynamic configuration management and feature toggling, while Zookeeper is more commonly used in distributed systems for coordination, configuration management, leader election, and consensus algorithms. 6. **Community Support**: Archaius has a smaller user community and may be less actively maintained compared to Zookeeper, which is a popular tool with a larger user base and active development community contributing to its ongoing support and improvements.

In Summary, Archaius and Zookeeper differ in scalability, data consistency, fault tolerance, concurrency control, use cases, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Zookeeper
Zookeeper
Archaius
Archaius

A centralized service for maintaining configuration information, naming, providing distributed synchronization, and providing group services. All of these kinds of services are used in some form or another by distributed applications.

Archaius includes a set of configuration management APIs used by Netflix. It provides the following functionality: Dynamic, Typed Properties High throughput and Thread Safe Configuration operations A polling framework that allows obtaining

Statistics
Stacks
889
Stacks
2
Followers
1.0K
Followers
3
Votes
43
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 11
    High performance ,easy to generate node specific config
  • 8
    Kafka support
  • 8
    Java
  • 5
    Spring Boot Support
  • 3
    Supports extensive distributed IPC
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Zookeeper, Archaius?

Consul

Consul

Consul is a tool for service discovery and configuration. Consul is distributed, highly available, and extremely scalable.

Eureka

Eureka

Eureka is a REST (Representational State Transfer) based service that is primarily used in the AWS cloud for locating services for the purpose of load balancing and failover of middle-tier servers.

etcd

etcd

etcd is a distributed key value store that provides a reliable way to store data across a cluster of machines. It’s open-source and available on GitHub. etcd gracefully handles master elections during network partitions and will tolerate machine failure, including the master.

Keepalived

Keepalived

The main goal of this project is to provide simple and robust facilities for loadbalancing and high-availability to Linux system and Linux based infrastructures.

SkyDNS

SkyDNS

SkyDNS is a distributed service for announcement and discovery of services. It leverages Raft for high-availability and consensus, and utilizes DNS queries to discover available services. This is done by leveraging SRV records in DNS, with special meaning given to subdomains, priorities and weights (more info here: http://blog.gopheracademy.com/skydns).

SmartStack

SmartStack

Scaling a web infrastructure requires services, and building a service-oriented infrastructure is hard. Make it EASY, with SmartStack’s automated, transparent service discovery and registration: cruise control for your distributed infrastructure.

Serf

Serf

Serf is a service discovery and orchestration tool that is decentralized, highly available, and fault tolerant. Serf runs on every major platform: Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows. It is extremely lightweight: it uses 5 to 10 MB of resident memory and primarily communicates using infrequent UDP messages.

Nacos

Nacos

It is an easy-to-use dynamic service discovery, configuration and service management platform for building cloud native applications.

Libraries.io

Libraries.io

It is an open source web service that lists software development project dependencies and alerts developers to new versions of the software libraries they are using.

ODD Platform

ODD Platform

It is a next-generation data discovery and observability tool for enterprises and startups that help to efficiently democratize data, powers collaboration of data science and data engineering teams, significantly reduces time to data discovery, cuts on data downtime and offers a modern, easy-to-use environment with quick time-to-value. It makes all your data entities reliable, observable, and easily discoverable.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot