Asciidoctor vs CUE: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown document, we will explore the key differences between Asciidoctor and CUE.

1. Syntax: Asciidoctor uses a plain text syntax for writing documents in a human-readable format, while CUE uses a domain-specific language for defining and validating data schemas.

2. Purpose: Asciidoctor is primarily used for writing technical documentation and books, while CUE is used for defining configuration files and data schemas that adhere to specific rules and constraints.

3. Output: Asciidoctor generates formatted documents such as HTML, PDF, and EPUB, while CUE outputs configuration files that enforce data validation rules and constraints.

4. Extensibility: Asciidoctor supports extensions and plugins to enhance functionality and customize document output, whereas CUE provides a built-in template system for defining reusable data schema patterns.

5. Tooling: Asciidoctor has a wide range of tooling and integrations for text editing, rendering, and publishing, while CUE focuses on providing a standalone CLI tool and a web-based tool for interacting with data schemas.

6. Community: Asciidoctor has a larger and more established community with extensive documentation and support resources, while CUE has a smaller but growing community focused on improving the CUE language and tooling.

In Summary, Asciidoctor and CUE differ in syntax, purpose, output, extensibility, tooling, and community support.