Autoprefixer vs Bourbon

Overview

Bourbon

Stacks131

Followers115

Votes20

GitHub Stars9.0K

Forks871

Autoprefixer

Stacks3.8K

Followers55

Votes0

Autoprefixer vs Bourbon: What are the differences?

Developers describe Autoprefixer as "PostCSS plugin to parse CSS and add vendor prefixes to CSS rules". It is a CSS post processor. It combs through compiled CSS files to add or remove vendor prefixes like -webkit and -moz after checking the code. On the other hand, Bourbon is detailed as "A lightweight mixin library for Sass". Bourbon is a library of pure sass mixins that are designed to be simple and easy to use. No configuration required. The mixins aim to be as vanilla as possible, meaning they should be as close to the original CSS syntax as possible.

Autoprefixer and Bourbon can be categorized as "CSS Pre-processors / Extensions" tools.

Bourbon is an open source tool with 8.86K GitHub stars and 917 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Bourbon's open source repository on GitHub.

Helpful, Nexway, and nclud are some of the popular companies that use Bourbon, whereas Autoprefixer is used by Startae, Brigade, and Clippings. Bourbon has a broader approval, being mentioned in 31 company stacks & 84 developers stacks; compared to Autoprefixer, which is listed in 6 company stacks and 11 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Bourbon	Autoprefixer
Bourbon is a library of pure sass mixins that are designed to be simple and easy to use. No configuration required. The mixins aim to be as vanilla as possible, meaning they should be as close to the original CSS syntax as possible.	It is a CSS post processor. It combs through compiled CSS files to add or remove vendor prefixes like -webkit and -moz after checking the code.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 9.0K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 871	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 131	Stacks 3.8K
Followers 115	Followers 55
Votes 20	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 14 Simple mixins 3 Lightweight 3 No javascript	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Sass	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Bourbon, Autoprefixer?

Sass

Sass is an extension of CSS3, adding nested rules, variables, mixins, selector inheritance, and more. It's translated to well-formatted, standard CSS using the command line tool or a web-framework plugin.

Less

Less is a CSS pre-processor, meaning that it extends the CSS language, adding features that allow variables, mixins, functions and many other techniques that allow you to make CSS that is more maintainable, themable and extendable.

Stylus

Stylus is a revolutionary new language, providing an efficient, dynamic, and expressive way to generate CSS. Supporting both an indented syntax and regular CSS style.

PostCSS

PostCSS is a tool for transforming CSS with JS plugins. These plugins can support variables and mixins, transpile future CSS syntax, inline images, and more.

Compass

The compass core framework is a design-agnostic framework that provides common code that would otherwise be duplicated across other frameworks and extensions.

CSS Modules

It is a CSS file in which all class names and animation names are scoped locally by default. The key words here are scoped locally. With this, your CSS class names become similar to local variables in JavaScript. It goes into the compiler, and CSS comes out the other side.

astroturf

It lets you write CSS in your JavaScript files without adding any runtime layer, and with your existing CSS processing pipeline.

PreCSS

It combines Sass-like syntactical sugar — like variables, conditionals, and iterators — with emerging CSS features — like logical and custom properties, media query ranges, and image sets.

Animate.css

It is a bunch of cool, fun, and cross-browser animations for you to use in your projects. Great for emphasis, home pages, sliders, and general just-add-water-awesomeness.