Bluebird vs Lodash

Overview

Lodash

Stacks10.7K

Followers886

Votes3

GitHub Stars61.3K

Forks7.1K

Bluebird

Stacks319

Followers13

Votes0

GitHub Stars20.7K

Forks2.3K

Bluebird vs Lodash: What are the differences?

Introduction: Bluebird and Lodash are popular libraries used in JavaScript development, offering different functionalities to developers.

Asynchronous vs. Utility Functions: Bluebird is primarily focused on providing tools for working with asynchronous operations, such as Promises, while Lodash is a utility library that offers a wide range of functions for manipulating data structures and simplifying operations on arrays, objects, and strings.
Error Handling Capabilities: Bluebird includes advanced error handling features, such as automatic stack trace tracking and the ability to access the original error thrown in a chain of promises, making it well-suited for complex asynchronous workflows. In contrast, Lodash does not focus on error handling but provides robust utilities for data manipulation and transformation.
Size and Performance: Bluebird is a smaller library compared to Lodash, which means it can offer better performance in terms of speed and memory usage when dealing with asynchronous tasks. Lodash, on the other hand, is a larger library that provides a comprehensive set of functions, making it more versatile for a wide range of data manipulation needs.
Browser vs. Server-side Usage: Bluebird is commonly used in server-side environments, such as Node.js, to handle asynchronous tasks efficiently, thanks to its robust Promise implementation. Meanwhile, Lodash is often utilized in both server-side and client-side applications to simplify data manipulation tasks and enhance code readability.
Specificity of Features: Bluebird is specifically designed to address the challenges of working with Promises and asynchronous programming paradigms, offering targeted features and optimizations in this area. In contrast, Lodash provides a diverse set of general-purpose utilities for tasks like iterating over arrays, filtering objects, and manipulating strings, catering to a broader range of programming needs.
Community Support and Maintenance: Bluebird has a dedicated community focused on maintaining and improving its capabilities related to asynchronous programming, ensuring consistent updates and support for developers working with Promises. Lodash also has a strong community backing but is more generalist in nature, offering support for a wide array of utility functions used in JavaScript development.

In Summary, Bluebird and Lodash cater to different aspects of JavaScript development, with Bluebird specializing in asynchronous operations and Promises while Lodash provides a comprehensive set of utility functions for data manipulation and simplifying code.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Lodash, Bluebird

Abigail

Dec 6, 2019

Decided

Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) provides standard data objects in JSON format for the healthcare industry. Since JSON objects are hierarchical and tree-like, we had a need to defensively 'pluck' fields from our JSON objects and do lots of mapping. We tried jQuery and Underscore and a few other technologies like FHIRPath; but Lodash has been the most well supported, works in the most contexts, has the cleanest syntax, etc. We particularly like the ES6 version of Lodash, where we can import the method names directly, without resorting to * or _ syntax. We got hooked on the 'get' function to defensively pluck fields from objects without crashing our user interface, and have found countless uses for the other lodash functions throughout our apps. Lodash is great for developing and optimizing algorithms.

38.3k views38.3k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Lodash	Bluebird
A JavaScript utility library delivering consistency, modularity, performance, & extras. It provides utility functions for common programming tasks using the functional programming paradigm.	It is a fully-featured promise library with a focus on innovative features and performance.
-	Synchronous inspection; Concurrency coordination; Promisification; Debuggability and error handling; Resource management; Cancellation and timeouts; Scoped prototypes; Promise monitoring
Statistics
GitHub Stars 61.3K	GitHub Stars 20.7K
GitHub Forks 7.1K	GitHub Forks 2.3K
Stacks 10.7K	Stacks 319
Followers 886	Followers 13
Votes 3	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 Better than Underscore 1 Simple 0 Better that Underscore Cons 1 It reduce the performance	No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript	JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Lodash, Bluebird?

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Immutable.js

Immutable provides Persistent Immutable List, Stack, Map, OrderedMap, Set, OrderedSet and Record. They are highly efficient on modern JavaScript VMs by using structural sharing via hash maps tries and vector tries as popularized by Clojure and Scala, minimizing the need to copy or cache data.

Ramda

It emphasizes a purer functional style. Immutability and side-effect free functions are at the heart of its design philosophy. This can help you get the job done with simple, elegant code.

Vue CLI

Vue CLI aims to be the standard tooling baseline for the Vue ecosystem. It ensures the various build tools work smoothly together with sensible defaults so you can focus on writing your app instead of spending days wrangling with config.

Luxon

It is a library that makes it easier to work with dates and times in Javascript. If you want, add and subtract them, format and parse them, ask them hard questions, and so on, it provides a much easier and comprehensive interface than the native types it wraps.

Prepack

Prepack is a partial evaluator for JavaScript. Prepack rewrites a JavaScript bundle, resulting in JavaScript code that executes more efficiently. For initialization-heavy code, Prepack works best in an environment where JavaScript parsing is effectively cached.

Blockly

It is a client-side library for the programming language JavaScript for creating block-based visual programming languages and editors. It is a project of Google and is free and open-source software.

Cesium

it is used to create the leading web-based globe and map for visualizing dynamic data. We strive for the best possible performance, precision, visual quality, ease of use, platform support, and content.

Related Comparisons

Bluebird vs Lodash: What are the differences?

Introduction: Bluebird and Lodash are popular libraries used in JavaScript development, offering different functionalities to developers.

Asynchronous vs. Utility Functions: Bluebird is primarily focused on providing tools for working with asynchronous operations, such as Promises, while Lodash is a utility library that offers a wide range of functions for manipulating data structures and simplifying operations on arrays, objects, and strings.
Error Handling Capabilities: Bluebird includes advanced error handling features, such as automatic stack trace tracking and the ability to access the original error thrown in a chain of promises, making it well-suited for complex asynchronous workflows. In contrast, Lodash does not focus on error handling but provides robust utilities for data manipulation and transformation.
Size and Performance: Bluebird is a smaller library compared to Lodash, which means it can offer better performance in terms of speed and memory usage when dealing with asynchronous tasks. Lodash, on the other hand, is a larger library that provides a comprehensive set of functions, making it more versatile for a wide range of data manipulation needs.
Browser vs. Server-side Usage: Bluebird is commonly used in server-side environments, such as Node.js, to handle asynchronous tasks efficiently, thanks to its robust Promise implementation. Meanwhile, Lodash is often utilized in both server-side and client-side applications to simplify data manipulation tasks and enhance code readability.
Specificity of Features: Bluebird is specifically designed to address the challenges of working with Promises and asynchronous programming paradigms, offering targeted features and optimizations in this area. In contrast, Lodash provides a diverse set of general-purpose utilities for tasks like iterating over arrays, filtering objects, and manipulating strings, catering to a broader range of programming needs.
Community Support and Maintenance: Bluebird has a dedicated community focused on maintaining and improving its capabilities related to asynchronous programming, ensuring consistent updates and support for developers working with Promises. Lodash also has a strong community backing but is more generalist in nature, offering support for a wide array of utility functions used in JavaScript development.

Bluebird vs Lodash

Overview