Cherokee vs Gunicorn: What are the differences?
Developers describe Cherokee as "High-performance web server". Cherokee is highly efficient, extremely lightweight and provides rock solid stability. Among its many features there is one that deserves special credit: a user friendly interface called cherokee-admin that is provided for a no-hassle configuration of every single feature of the server. On the other hand, Gunicorn is detailed as "A Python WSGI HTTP Server for UNIX". Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.
Cherokee and Gunicorn can be categorized as "Web Servers" tools.
"The logo is cute" is the top reason why over 2 developers like Cherokee, while over 26 developers mention "Python" as the leading cause for choosing Gunicorn.
Gunicorn is an open source tool with 5.96K GitHub stars and 1.12K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Gunicorn's open source repository on GitHub.
What is Cherokee?
What is Gunicorn?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What are the cons of using Cherokee?
What are the cons of using Gunicorn?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Cherokee?
Gunicorn is WSGI container that we used to run our Tornado code as it supports Asynchronous operations on tornado.
Gunicorn runs as the HTTP application server. Serves the django application in WSGI mode.