Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

CQEngine

3
20
+ 1
0
Redis

58.1K
44.7K
+ 1
3.9K
Add tool

CQEngine vs Redis: What are the differences?

CQEngine vs Redis

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between CQEngine and Redis.

  1. 1. Indexing Approach: CQEngine is an in-memory collection indexing engine that supports complex queries on Java objects. It provides a runtime indexing mechanism that allows indexing of any field or attribute in the collection for efficient searching. On the other hand, Redis is an in-memory data structure store that primarily focuses on key-value storage. It offers a limited set of indexing capabilities and is optimized for high-speed data retrieval.

  2. 2. Data Persistence: CQEngine offers no built-in persistence mechanism as it relies on the Java collections framework. Therefore, the data stored in CQEngine is not durable and will be lost upon application restart. In contrast, Redis provides built-in persistence options, allowing data to be stored on disk and surviving application restarts. Redis also supports data replication and clustering for high availability and fault tolerance.

  3. 3. Querying Language: CQEngine uses the Java programming language for querying. It provides an expressive API that allows users to write complex queries using object-oriented principles. On the other hand, Redis uses a custom querying language called RedisQL, which is based on SQL. RedisQL allows users to perform simple to moderately complex queries using a familiar SQL-like syntax.

  4. 4. Data Modeling Flexibility: CQEngine provides flexibility in data modeling as it can index any field or attribute in Java objects, including nested objects and collections. This allows for efficient querying even on complex data structures. In contrast, Redis has a more limited data modeling flexibility as it primarily focuses on key-value storage. While Redis supports various data types like strings, lists, sets, and hashes, modeling relationships between objects requires custom application-level logic.

  5. 5. Scalability and Performance: CQEngine is designed for in-memory data processing and is suitable for scenarios where data can fit in memory. It offers high-performance querying capabilities due to its efficient indexing mechanism. Redis, on the other hand, is designed to handle large datasets and can scale horizontally across multiple nodes. It provides high throughput and low latency even when working with large volumes of data.

  6. 6. Ecosystem and Use Cases: CQEngine is specifically designed for Java applications and integrates well with existing Java frameworks and libraries. It is suitable for scenarios where complex querying and in-memory data processing are required. Redis, on the other hand, has a broader ecosystem and supports multiple programming languages. It is commonly used as a caching layer, message broker, and for real-time analytics due to its fast data retrieval capabilities.

In summary, CQEngine and Redis differ in terms of their indexing approach, data persistence, querying language, data modeling flexibility, scalability and performance, and ecosystem and use cases. CQEngine is focused on Java-based in-memory collection indexing, while Redis is a more versatile in-memory data structure store with built-in persistence options and support for various data types.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of CQEngine
Pros of Redis
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 886
      Performance
    • 542
      Super fast
    • 513
      Ease of use
    • 444
      In-memory cache
    • 324
      Advanced key-value cache
    • 194
      Open source
    • 182
      Easy to deploy
    • 164
      Stable
    • 155
      Free
    • 121
      Fast
    • 42
      High-Performance
    • 40
      High Availability
    • 35
      Data Structures
    • 32
      Very Scalable
    • 24
      Replication
    • 22
      Great community
    • 22
      Pub/Sub
    • 19
      "NoSQL" key-value data store
    • 16
      Hashes
    • 13
      Sets
    • 11
      Sorted Sets
    • 10
      NoSQL
    • 10
      Lists
    • 9
      Async replication
    • 9
      BSD licensed
    • 8
      Bitmaps
    • 8
      Integrates super easy with Sidekiq for Rails background
    • 7
      Keys with a limited time-to-live
    • 7
      Open Source
    • 6
      Lua scripting
    • 6
      Strings
    • 5
      Awesomeness for Free
    • 5
      Hyperloglogs
    • 4
      Transactions
    • 4
      Outstanding performance
    • 4
      Runs server side LUA
    • 4
      LRU eviction of keys
    • 4
      Feature Rich
    • 4
      Written in ANSI C
    • 4
      Networked
    • 3
      Data structure server
    • 3
      Performance & ease of use
    • 2
      Dont save data if no subscribers are found
    • 2
      Automatic failover
    • 2
      Easy to use
    • 2
      Temporarily kept on disk
    • 2
      Scalable
    • 2
      Existing Laravel Integration
    • 2
      Channels concept
    • 2
      Object [key/value] size each 500 MB
    • 2
      Simple

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of CQEngine
    Cons of Redis
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 15
        Cannot query objects directly
      • 3
        No secondary indexes for non-numeric data types
      • 1
        No WAL

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is CQEngine?

      It is a NoSQL indexing and Query Engine, for retrieving objects matching SQL-like queries from Java collections, with ultra-low latency

      What is Redis?

      Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      Jobs that mention CQEngine and Redis as a desired skillset
      LaunchDarkly
      Oakland, California, United States
      What companies use CQEngine?
      What companies use Redis?
      See which teams inside your own company are using CQEngine or Redis.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with CQEngine?
      What tools integrate with Redis?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      Nov 20 2019 at 3:38AM

      OneSignal

      PostgreSQLRedisRuby+8
      9
      4639
      Jun 6 2019 at 5:11PM

      AppSignal

      RedisRubyKafka+9
      15
      1638
      GitHubDockerReact+17
      40
      36244
      What are some alternatives to CQEngine and Redis?
      Lucene
      Lucene Core, our flagship sub-project, provides Java-based indexing and search technology, as well as spellchecking, hit highlighting and advanced analysis/tokenization capabilities.
      Hazelcast
      With its various distributed data structures, distributed caching capabilities, elastic nature, memcache support, integration with Spring and Hibernate and more importantly with so many happy users, Hazelcast is feature-rich, enterprise-ready and developer-friendly in-memory data grid solution.
      Aerospike
      Aerospike is an open-source, modern database built from the ground up to push the limits of flash storage, processors and networks. It was designed to operate with predictable low latency at high throughput with uncompromising reliability – both high availability and ACID guarantees.
      SAP HANA
      It is an application that uses in-memory database technology that allows the processing of massive amounts of real-time data in a short time. The in-memory computing engine allows it to process data stored in RAM as opposed to reading it from a disk.
      Apache Ignite
      It is a memory-centric distributed database, caching, and processing platform for transactional, analytical, and streaming workloads delivering in-memory speeds at petabyte scale
      See all alternatives