StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Templating Languages & Extensions
  4. CSS Pre Processors Extensions
  5. CSS Modules vs Emotion

CSS Modules vs Emotion

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CSS Modules
CSS Modules
Stacks132
Followers161
Votes2
Emotion
Emotion
Stacks313
Followers239
Votes3
GitHub Stars17.9K
Forks1.1K

CSS Modules vs Emotion: What are the differences?

Key differences between CSS Modules and Emotion

CSS Modules and Emotion are both popular libraries used for styling in web development. While they share some similarities, there are several key differences that set them apart.

  1. Importing Styles: When using CSS Modules, styles are imported as regular JavaScript objects. This means that styles are locally scoped to the component they are imported into, preventing class name collisions. On the other hand, Emotion uses a different approach where styles are written using tagged template literals. This allows for more flexibility in composing and reusing styles, but it also means that styles are not locally scoped by default.

  2. Style Composition: CSS Modules support the concept of composing styles by using composition syntax. This means that you can easily combine multiple styles together to create new styles. Emotion, on the other hand, has a different way of handling style composition. It provides a set of utility functions that can be used to combine styles, allowing for more fine-grained control over how styles are composed.

  3. Dynamic Styling: CSS Modules primarily focus on static styles that are defined at build time. While it is possible to add dynamic styling using JavaScript, it requires additional configuration and complexity. Emotion, on the other hand, is designed with dynamic styling in mind. It provides powerful features like styled components and CSS-in-JS syntax that make it easier to create dynamic and interactive styles.

  4. Code Size and Performance: CSS Modules generate class names at build time, which can result in larger bundle sizes if many classes are used. However, it typically offers better runtime performance since the styles are applied using regular CSS classes. Emotion, on the other hand, generates styles at runtime, which can result in smaller bundle sizes. However, this can lead to slightly slower runtime performance due to the additional overhead of generating and applying styles.

  5. Developer Experience: CSS Modules fit well with the traditional CSS workflow and can be easier to adopt for developers who are already familiar with CSS. Emotion, on the other hand, provides a more flexible and powerful API with features like theming, prop-based styling, and dynamic styles. This can make it more suitable for complex styling requirements and developers who prefer a more declarative approach.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: CSS Modules has been around for a longer time and has a larger community and ecosystem. It is well-supported by popular build tools and frameworks like webpack and React. Emotion, on the other hand, is a more recent library but has gained popularity due to its powerful features and developer-friendly APIs. It has a growing community and is actively maintained.

In Summary, CSS Modules and Emotion differ in how styles are imported, composed, and used for dynamic styling. CSS Modules offer a simpler and more traditional CSS workflow, while Emotion provides more flexible and powerful styling options. The choice between the two depends on the specific project requirements and developer preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

CSS Modules
CSS Modules
Emotion
Emotion

It is a CSS file in which all class names and animation names are scoped locally by default. The key words here are scoped locally. With this, your CSS class names become similar to local variables in JavaScript. It goes into the compiler, and CSS comes out the other side.

Emotion is a performant and flexible CSS-in-JS library. Building on many other CSS-in-JS libraries, it allows you to style apps quickly with string or object styles. It has predictable composition to avoid specificity issues with CSS. With source maps and labels, Emotion has a great developer experience and great performance with heavy caching in production.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
17.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.1K
Stacks
132
Stacks
313
Followers
161
Followers
239
Votes
2
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Static rather than compiled at runtime
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to use

What are some alternatives to CSS Modules, Emotion?

Sass

Sass

Sass is an extension of CSS3, adding nested rules, variables, mixins, selector inheritance, and more. It's translated to well-formatted, standard CSS using the command line tool or a web-framework plugin.

Less

Less

Less is a CSS pre-processor, meaning that it extends the CSS language, adding features that allow variables, mixins, functions and many other techniques that allow you to make CSS that is more maintainable, themable and extendable.

Stylus

Stylus

Stylus is a revolutionary new language, providing an efficient, dynamic, and expressive way to generate CSS. Supporting both an indented syntax and regular CSS style.

Ant Design

Ant Design

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

PostCSS

PostCSS

PostCSS is a tool for transforming CSS with JS plugins. These plugins can support variables and mixins, transpile future CSS syntax, inline images, and more.

Angular Universal

Angular Universal

It executes on the server, generating static application pages that later get bootstrapped on the client. This means that the application generally renders more quickly, giving users a chance to view the application layout before it becomes fully interactive.

Angular Material

Angular Material

Sprint from Zero to App. Hit the ground running with comprehensive, modern UI components that work across the web, mobile and desktop. It allows to create material styled angular apps fast and easy.

Bourbon

Bourbon

Bourbon is a library of pure sass mixins that are designed to be simple and easy to use. No configuration required. The mixins aim to be as vanilla as possible, meaning they should be as close to the original CSS syntax as possible.

PrimeReact

PrimeReact

PrimeReact is a rich set of open source UI Components for React.

React Router

React Router

React Router is a complete routing solution designed specifically for React.js. It painlessly synchronizes the components of your application with the URL, with first-class support for nesting, transitions, and server side rendering.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase