StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Javascript Utilities And Libraries
  5. Editor.js vs decaffeinate

Editor.js vs decaffeinate

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

decaffeinate
decaffeinate
Stacks2
Followers6
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.7K
Forks119
Editor.js
Editor.js
Stacks15
Followers17
Votes0
GitHub Stars31.1K
Forks2.2K

Editor.js vs decaffeinate: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will discuss the key differences between Editor.js and decaffeinate.

  1. Programming Language: Editor.js is a modern JavaScript library for building a WYSIWYG editor, while decaffeinate is a tool for converting CoffeeScript code to modern JavaScript. Editor.js is used for creating rich text editors, whereas decaffeinate specializes in migration of CoffeeScript codebases to JavaScript.

  2. Primary Functionality: Editor.js is primarily used for creating visual content editors, making it easier to format and style text. On the other hand, decaffeinate focuses on transforming CoffeeScript code to ES6 JavaScript code without losing the logic and functionality of the original code.

  3. Community Support: Editor.js has a strong community of developers actively contributing to its growth and improvement. It has regular updates and new features added to enhance its functionality. In contrast, decaffeinate has a smaller community due to its specific purpose of converting CoffeeScript code, leading to fewer updates and features compared to Editor.js.

  4. Usage Scope: Editor.js is widely used in web development projects that require rich text editing features, such as content management systems and blogging platforms. decaffeinate, on the other hand, is mainly used by developers who are transitioning from CoffeeScript to JavaScript in their projects.

  5. Ease of Integration: Editor.js can be easily integrated into existing web applications using its API, making it seamless to add rich text editing capabilities. decaffeinate, on the other hand, requires a separate step in the development process to convert CoffeeScript files, which may add complexity to the integration process.

  6. Compatibility: Editor.js is compatible with modern browsers and has a responsive design for different devices, ensuring a consistent user experience across platforms. decaffeinate focuses on ensuring that the converted JavaScript code retains the functionality and structure of the original CoffeeScript code, maintaining compatibility with existing systems.

In Summary, the key differences between Editor.js and decaffeinate lie in their primary functionality, community support, usage scope, ease of integration, and compatibility with modern web development practices.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

decaffeinate
decaffeinate
Editor.js
Editor.js

Convert your CoffeeScript source to modern JavaScript with decaffeinate. For real-world use cases, spend some time understanding the different options and nuances of the decaffeinate tool.

It is a block-styled editor for rich media stories. It outputs clean data in JSON instead of heavy HTML-markup. And more important thing is that Editor.js is designed to be API extendable and pluggable.

Fully automated conversion of the CoffeeScript language to modern JavaScript;Preserve whitespace, formatting, and comments as much as possible to allow a full one-time conversion of your CoffeeScript source code;Focus on correctness as the first priority, with some options to generate nicer code at the expense of 100% correctness;Provide helpful error messages when it encounters an unsupported language construct
Clean data output; API pluggable; Open source
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.7K
GitHub Stars
31.1K
GitHub Forks
119
GitHub Forks
2.2K
Stacks
2
Stacks
15
Followers
6
Followers
17
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
CoffeeScript
CoffeeScript
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to decaffeinate, Editor.js?

Underscore

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Deno

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Chart.js

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Immutable.js

Immutable.js

Immutable provides Persistent Immutable List, Stack, Map, OrderedMap, Set, OrderedSet and Record. They are highly efficient on modern JavaScript VMs by using structural sharing via hash maps tries and vector tries as popularized by Clojure and Scala, minimizing the need to copy or cache data.

Lodash

Lodash

A JavaScript utility library delivering consistency, modularity, performance, & extras. It provides utility functions for common programming tasks using the functional programming paradigm.

Ramda

Ramda

It emphasizes a purer functional style. Immutability and side-effect free functions are at the heart of its design philosophy. This can help you get the job done with simple, elegant code.

Vue CLI

Vue CLI

Vue CLI aims to be the standard tooling baseline for the Vue ecosystem. It ensures the various build tools work smoothly together with sensible defaults so you can focus on writing your app instead of spending days wrangling with config.

Luxon

Luxon

It is a library that makes it easier to work with dates and times in Javascript. If you want, add and subtract them, format and parse them, ask them hard questions, and so on, it provides a much easier and comprehensive interface than the native types it wraps.

Prepack

Prepack

Prepack is a partial evaluator for JavaScript. Prepack rewrites a JavaScript bundle, resulting in JavaScript code that executes more efficiently. For initialization-heavy code, Prepack works best in an environment where JavaScript parsing is effectively cached.

Blockly

Blockly

It is a client-side library for the programming language JavaScript for creating block-based visual programming languages and editors. It is a project of Google and is free and open-source software.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase