StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Javascript Utilities And Libraries
  5. faast.js vs lodash

faast.js vs lodash

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Lodash
Lodash
Stacks10.7K
Followers886
Votes3
GitHub Stars61.3K
Forks7.1K
faast.js
faast.js
Stacks2
Followers7
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.5K
Forks42

faast.js vs lodash: What are the differences?

What is faast.js? Serverless batch computing made simple. Simplifies serverless batch applications by automating infrastructure, code packaging, invocation, and cleanup. Combine the power of scalable serverless functions with the ease-of-use and familiarity of ordinary async functions.

What is lodash? A modern JavaScript utility library delivering modularity, performance & extras. A JavaScript utility library delivering consistency, modularity, performance, & extras.

faast.js and lodash can be primarily classified as "Javascript Utilities & Libraries" tools.

faast.js and lodash are both open source tools. lodash with 40K GitHub stars and 4.16K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than faast.js with 1.21K GitHub stars and 24 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Lodash, faast.js

Abigail
Abigail

Dec 6, 2019

Decided

Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) provides standard data objects in JSON format for the healthcare industry. Since JSON objects are hierarchical and tree-like, we had a need to defensively 'pluck' fields from our JSON objects and do lots of mapping. We tried jQuery and Underscore and a few other technologies like FHIRPath; but Lodash has been the most well supported, works in the most contexts, has the cleanest syntax, etc. We particularly like the ES6 version of Lodash, where we can import the method names directly, without resorting to * or _ syntax. We got hooked on the 'get' function to defensively pluck fields from objects without crashing our user interface, and have found countless uses for the other lodash functions throughout our apps. Lodash is great for developing and optimizing algorithms.

38.3k views38.3k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Lodash
Lodash
faast.js
faast.js

A JavaScript utility library delivering consistency, modularity, performance, & extras. It provides utility functions for common programming tasks using the functional programming paradigm.

Simplifies serverless batch applications by automating infrastructure, code packaging, invocation, and cleanup. Combine the power of scalable serverless functions with the ease-of-use and familiarity of ordinary async functions.

-
Frictionless; Scalable; Cost-effective; Ephemeral; Support for TypeScript and JavaScript; Built-in support for AWS Lambda and Google Cloud Functions
Statistics
GitHub Stars
61.3K
GitHub Stars
1.5K
GitHub Forks
7.1K
GitHub Forks
42
Stacks
10.7K
Stacks
2
Followers
886
Followers
7
Votes
3
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Better than Underscore
  • 1
    Simple
  • 0
    Better that Underscore
Cons
  • 1
    It reduce the performance
No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Google Cloud Functions
Google Cloud Functions

What are some alternatives to Lodash, faast.js?

Underscore

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Deno

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Chart.js

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Immutable.js

Immutable.js

Immutable provides Persistent Immutable List, Stack, Map, OrderedMap, Set, OrderedSet and Record. They are highly efficient on modern JavaScript VMs by using structural sharing via hash maps tries and vector tries as popularized by Clojure and Scala, minimizing the need to copy or cache data.

Ramda

Ramda

It emphasizes a purer functional style. Immutability and side-effect free functions are at the heart of its design philosophy. This can help you get the job done with simple, elegant code.

Vue CLI

Vue CLI

Vue CLI aims to be the standard tooling baseline for the Vue ecosystem. It ensures the various build tools work smoothly together with sensible defaults so you can focus on writing your app instead of spending days wrangling with config.

Luxon

Luxon

It is a library that makes it easier to work with dates and times in Javascript. If you want, add and subtract them, format and parse them, ask them hard questions, and so on, it provides a much easier and comprehensive interface than the native types it wraps.

Prepack

Prepack

Prepack is a partial evaluator for JavaScript. Prepack rewrites a JavaScript bundle, resulting in JavaScript code that executes more efficiently. For initialization-heavy code, Prepack works best in an environment where JavaScript parsing is effectively cached.

Blockly

Blockly

It is a client-side library for the programming language JavaScript for creating block-based visual programming languages and editors. It is a project of Google and is free and open-source software.

Cesium

Cesium

it is used to create the leading web-based globe and map for visualizing dynamic data. We strive for the best possible performance, precision, visual quality, ease of use, platform support, and content.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase